Geographical Research, Volume. 39, Issue 8, 1822(2020)

“Wheel hub” model: The tourism space structure of urban self-driving tourists: Taking Beijing, Xi'an and Wuhan cities as examples

Tiange ZHANG1... Jinfeng WU1,2,*, Xiaoteng SHI1, Baoqing WU1, Chunchun DENG1 and Shanshan WU1 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China
  • 2Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Tourism Information Science, Xi'an 710119, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(8)
    Self-driving visiting rates to target scenic spots and the fitting curve of three cities
    Spatial distribution pattern of self-driving visiting rates of three cities
    Distribution of accumulative self-driving visiting rates and slope value curve
    Spatial distribution of time consumed driving from three cities to target scenic spots
    “Wheel hub” model of self-driving tourism space
    • Table 1. [in Chinese]

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. [in Chinese]

      调查项目北京西安武汉调查项目北京西安武汉
      性别39.7240.5239.94职业事业单位人员11.4110.728.47
      53.1551.0250.82教师4.727.563.08
      未填写7.138.469.24学生19.6424.6028.39
      婚姻未婚44.8743.5657.84公务员1.932.261.64
      已婚38.1842.4424.74企业人员26.8221.6723.67
      未填写16.9514.0017.42私企老板2.651.580.96
      年龄≤ 17岁5.193.392.60服务业人员4.486.214.62
      18~27岁47.1443.5762.46自由职业者12.579.7112.03
      28~37岁30.8132.7322.44退休1.492.261.83
      38~47岁10.5410.276.35其他11.9810.1611.65
      48~57岁2.995.642.21未填写2.313.273.66
      58~67岁1.401.811.06每月收入≤ 1500元4.098.696.06
      ≥ 68岁0.530.561.151500~4500元13.2429.9128.10
      未填写1.402.031.734500~9000元33.8030.0226.28
      教育程度初中及以下3.665.302.609000~35000元24.6010.056.83
      高中8.679.149.8235000~55000元1.650.230.87
      大专16.1321.7822.9155000~80000元0.910.220.48
      本科52.1940.4150.53≥ 80000元0.630.230.67
      研究生16.4220.3210.68无收入14.6814.6720.12
      未填写2.933.053.46未填写6.405.9810.59
    • Table 2. The list of target scenic spots

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The list of target scenic spots

      目标景区北京西安武汉
      非共同景区安庆天柱山、安新白洋淀、大理崇圣寺三塔、济南天下第一泉、天津古文化街、武隆喀斯特、西安兵马俑、西安钟楼、忻州雁门关、尧山-中原大佛安庆天柱山、池州九华山、衡山、商洛金丝峡、嵩山少林寺、武隆喀斯特、榆林红碱淖鄂州莲花山、池州九华山、衡山、咸宁赤壁古战场、天津古文化街、商洛金丝峡、嵩山少林寺、榆林红碱淖
      共同景区阿坝九寨沟、阿勒泰喀纳斯、安顺黄果树、八达岭长城、巴丹吉林沙漠、巴州博斯腾湖、包头敕勒川、宝鸡法门寺、北京故宫、成都青城山、承德避暑山庄、大连金石滩、大同云冈石窟、大足石刻、迪庆香格里拉、东方明珠、敦煌鸣沙山、鄂尔多斯成吉思汗陵、甘南草原、广州白云山、贵阳多彩贵州城、桂林漓江、哈尔滨太阳岛、哈密巴里坤古城景区、海北州青海湖、汉中武侯祠、杭州西湖、洪桐大槐树、黄山、吉安井冈山、焦作云台山、九江庐山、喀什噶尔老城、拉萨布达拉宫、乐山峨眉山、洛阳龙门石窟、满洲里中俄边境、漠河北极村、南昌滕王阁、南京中山陵、南宁青秀山、平遥古城、秦皇岛北戴河、青岛崂山、曲阜三孔、三亚天涯海角、厦门鼓浪屿、韶山、深圳华侨城、神农架、沈阳故宫、十堰武当山、石家庄西柏坡、苏州园林、太行大峡谷、太原晋祠、泰安泰山、天水麦积山石窟、吐鲁番葡萄沟、渭南华山、乌鲁木齐天山天池景区、武汉黄鹤楼、武夷山、西宁塔尔寺、西双版纳、忻州五台山、烟台蓬莱阁、延安宝塔山、伊春汤旺河、银川沙湖、张家界、张掖丹霞景区、长春净月潭、舟山普陀山、遵义会议会址
    • Table 3. Threshold time value between comfort and fatigue of self-driving tourism

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Threshold time value between comfort and fatigue of self-driving tourism

      舒适时间(h)比例(%)疲惫时间(h)比例(%)
      <334.3>317.2
      <421.4>415.3
      <516.9>516.3
      <614.9>619.6
      <71.9>78.4
      <85.8>812.5
      <90.5>92.1
      <104.4>108.5
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tiange ZHANG, Jinfeng WU, Xiaoteng SHI, Baoqing WU, Chunchun DENG, Shanshan WU. “Wheel hub” model: The tourism space structure of urban self-driving tourists: Taking Beijing, Xi'an and Wuhan cities as examples[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(8): 1822

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Aug. 15, 2019

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Apr. 23, 2021

    The Author Email: WU Jinfeng (jfwu@snnu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.11821/dlyj020190697

    Topics