Fig. 1. Simulation results of FPM reconstruction with several systematic errors added in

Fig. 2. Simulation results of systematic error correction with multiple algorithms

Fig. 3. Diagram of sub-region translation FPM for pupil reconstruction

Fig. 4. Comparison of grid noise removal from sigma star transparent sample

Fig. 5. Comparison of focusing from U2OS sample

Fig. 6. Comparison of image contrast improvement after deconvolution using reconstructed pupil functions

Fig. 7. Simulation results of the influence of spatial sampling rate and spectral overlapping rate on CTF reconstruction

Fig. 8. Simulation results of the influence of captured image number and iteration number on CTF reconstruction

Fig. 9. Experimental results of the influence of captured image number and iteration number on CTF reconstruction

Fig. 10. Pupil images reconstructed by three schemes of ST-FPM with 5%~50% pixels translation distances in simulations