Study On Optical Communications, Volume. 49, Issue 3, 19(2023)

High Precision Traffic Identification Method based on GAN and XGBoost Fusion

Qi-feng GUAN*, Su ZHAO, and Xiao-rong ZHU
Author Affiliations
  • Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Wireless Communication, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Block diagram of the application identification system
    The application identification system
    The importance score of features
    The accuracy of the service identification
    The application identification time
    • Table 1. The application types

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. The application types

      应用类型类型介绍业务类别
      流媒体类视频、直播流量1
      下载类文件类业务的上传与下载2
      即时类微信等社交平台数据交互、网页浏览3
      邮件类型邮箱流量4
    • Table 2. The traffic characteristics

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The traffic characteristics

      流量特征字段描述
      dpnum数据流总报文数
      dpl_total数据流报文总长度
      dpnum_s发包率
      dpl_s流发送速率(按字节)
      duration流持续时间
      dpl_max最大报文长度
      dpl_min最小报文长度
      dpl_mean平均报文长度
      dpl_std报文长度标准差
      fpnum上行流报文总数
      fpl_total上行流报文总长度
      fpl_max上行流最大报文长度
      fpl_min上行流最小报文上行长度
      fpl_mean上行流平均报文上行长度
      fpl_std上行流报文长度标准差
      bpnum下行流包总数目
      bpl_total下行流报文总长度
      bpl_max下行流最大报文长度
      bpl_min下行流最小报文长度
      bpl_mean下行流平均报文长度
      bpl_std下行流报文长度标准差
    • Table 3. The feature number and accuracy of application identification

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. The feature number and accuracy of application identification

      特征数准确率(%)特征数准确率(%)
      1092.261294.51
      1496.151697.32
      1897.582197.72
    • Table 4. The number and accuracy of the sample sets

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. The number and accuracy of the sample sets

      业务类型样本数生成样本数总样本数准确率(%)混合样本准确率(%)
      19 9801 00010 98093.7098.85
      26 3242 5328 85690.2097.75
      33 5004 7378 23782.2597.30
      43 1504 8508 00071.5096.98
    • Table 5. Comparison of accuracy of different algorithm models

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Comparison of accuracy of different algorithm models

      算法准确率(%)
      朴素贝叶斯44.80
      随机森林80.25
      决策树85.90
      CNN85.38
      循环神经网络82.25
      本文算法97.32
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Qi-feng GUAN, Su ZHAO, Xiao-rong ZHU. High Precision Traffic Identification Method based on GAN and XGBoost Fusion[J]. Study On Optical Communications, 2023, 49(3): 19

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Jul. 28, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jun. 12, 2023

    The Author Email: Qi-feng GUAN (841822982@qq.com)

    DOI:10.13756/j.gtxyj.2023.03.004

    Topics