Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 56, Issue 18, 181006(2019)
No-Reference Stereo Image Quality Assessment of Cyclopean Images Optimized Using Quaternion Wavelet Transform
Figures & Tables(12)
Fig. 2. Cyclopean images produced by proposed method. (a) Left view; (b) right view; (c) cyclopean image
Table 1. Comparison of PLCC on LIVE3D Phase I
View tableTable 1. Comparison of PLCC on LIVE3D Phase I
Method WN JP2K JPEG Blur FF All Method in Ref. [3] 0.942 0.912 0.603 0.942 0.776 0.917 Method in Ref. [4] 0.917 0.907 0.695 0.917 0.735 0.895 Method in Ref. [6] 0.961 0.917 0.746 0.953 0.721 0.922 Method in Ref. [8] 0.923 0.898 0.632 0.928 0.845 0.926 Method in Ref. [9] 0.925 0.848 0.626 0.899 0.707 0.887 Method in Ref. [7] 0.919 0.938 0.806 0.881 0.758 0.917 Proposed method 0.963 0.935 0.682 0.958 0.877 0.947
Table 2. Comparison of SROCC on LIVE3D Phase I
View tableTable 2. Comparison of SROCC on LIVE3D Phase I
Method WN JP2K JPEG Blur FF All Method in Ref. [3] 0.948 0.888 0.530 0.925 0.707 0.916 Method in Ref. [4] 0.919 0.863 0.617 0.878 0.652 0.891 Method in Ref. [6] 0.906 0.838 0.603 0.791 0.679 0.903 Method in Ref. [8] 0.909 0.889 0.613 0.877 0.758 0.925 Method in Ref. [9] 0.931 0.837 0.638 0.833 0.649 0.892 Method in Ref. [7] 0.910 0.917 0.782 0.865 0.666 0.911 Proposed method 0.945 0.892 0.667 0.927 0.829 0.928
Table 3. Comparison of RMSE on LIVE3D Phase I
View tableTable 3. Comparison of RMSE on LIVE3D Phase I
Method WN JP2K JPEG Blur FF All Method in Ref. [3] 5.581 5.320 5.216 4.822 7.837 6.533 Method in Ref. [4] 6.433 5.402 4.523 5.898 8.322 7.247 Method in Ref. [6] 3.931 4.873 3.959 4.326 8.613 6.258 Method in Ref. [8] 6.107 6.000 5.926 6.839 6.135 6.148 Method in Ref. [7] 6.664 4.943 4.391 6.938 9.317 6.598 Proposed method 3.506 3.645 3.308 3.081 4.993 5.032
Table 4. Comparison of PLCC on LIVE3D Phase II
View tableTable 4. Comparison of PLCC on LIVE3D Phase II
Method WN JP2K JPEG Blur FF All Method in Ref. [3] 0.957 0.834 0.862 0.963 0.901 0.900 Method in Ref. [4] 0.947 0.899 0.901 0.941 0.932 0.895 Method in Ref. [6] 0.953 0.847 0.888 0.968 0.944 0.913 Method in Ref. [9] 0.904 0.634 0.647 0.967 0.851 0.818 Method in Ref. [7] 0.920 0.867 0.829 0.878 0.836 0.845 Proposed method 0.976 0.922 0.853 0.969 0.946 0.919
Table 5. Comparison of SROCC on LIVE3D Phase II
View tableTable 5. Comparison of SROCC on LIVE3D Phase II
Method WN JP2K JPEG Blur FF All Method in Ref. [3] 0.940 0.814 0.843 0.908 0.884 0.889 Method in Ref. [4] 0.950 0.867 0.867 0.900 0.933 0.880 Method in Ref. [6] 0.946 0.845 0.818 0.903 0.899 0.905 Method in Ref. [9] 0.893 0.553 0.593 0.869 0.828 0.825 Method in Ref. [7] 0.932 0.864 0.839 0.846 0.860 0.888 Proposed method 0.960 0.903 0.832 0.927 0.945 0.917
Table 6. Comparison of RMSE on LIVE3D Phase II
View tableTable 6. Comparison of RMSE on LIVE3D Phase II
Method WN JP2K JPEG Blur FF All Method in Ref. [3] 3.368 5.562 3.865 3.747 4.966 4.987 Method in Ref. [4] 3.513 4.298 3.342 4.725 4.180 5.102 Method in Ref. [6] 3.547 5.482 4.169 4.453 4.199 4.657 Method in Ref. [7] 4.325 5.087 4.756 6.662 6.519 7.279 Proposed method 2.011 3.192 2.547 2.376 3.521 4.085
Table 7. Running time of different algorithms
View tableTable 7. Running time of different algorithms
Method Time /s Method in Ref. [3] 23.110 Method in Ref. [4] 11.667 Method in Ref. [6] 170.396 Proposed method 1.692
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yifan Li, Chaofeng Li, Qingbing Sang. No-Reference Stereo Image Quality Assessment of Cyclopean Images Optimized Using Quaternion Wavelet Transform[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(18): 181006
Paper Information
Category: Image Processing
Received: Feb. 27, 2019
Accepted: Apr. 9, 2019
Published Online: Sep. 9, 2019
The Author Email: Li Chaofeng (wxlichaofeng@126.com), Sang Qingbing (sangqb@163.com)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20