Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 43, Issue 10, 1011001(2023)

Multi-Field-of-View Sparse Aperture Imaging Based on Double Zernike Polynomials

Junliu Fan1,2, Quanying Wu2、*, Baohua Chen2, Lei Chen1、**, Jun Wang2, Senmiao Wang2,3,4, and Xiaoyi Chen5
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China
  • 2School of Physical Science and Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China
  • 3Graduate Workstation in Soochow Mason Optics Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215028, Jiangsu, China
  • 4Graduate Workstation in Suzhou FOIF Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China
  • 5Suzhou Mason Optical Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215028, Jiangsu, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Configuration of Golay3 sparse aperture system
    Coordinates of 17 field points in the optical system
    MTFs of Golay3 optical system under different field coordinates calculated by DZP. (a) (0°, 0°); (b) (0.05°, 0°); (c) (0°, 0.05°); (d) (-0.05°, 0°); (e) (0°, -0.05°); (f) (0.1°, 0°); (g) (0°, 0.1°); (h) (-0.1°, 0°); (i) (0°, -0.1°)
    MTFs of Golay3 optical system under different field coordinates calculated by ZEMAX software. (a) (0°, 0°); (b) (0.05°, 0°); (c) (0°, 0.05°); (d) (-0.05°, 0°); (e) (0°, -0.05°); (f) (0.1°, 0°); (g) (0°, 0.1°); (h) (-0.1°, 0°); (i) (0°, -0.1°)
    Simulated imaging results under different field coordinates of sparse aperture optical system. (a) (0°, 0°); (b) (0.05°, 0°); (c) (0°, 0.05°); (d) (-0.05°, 0°); (e) (0°, -0.05°); (f) (0.1°, 0°); (g) (0°, 0.1°); (h) (-0.1°, 0°); (i) (0°, -0.1°)
    Simulated imaging results under different field coordinates of full aperture optical system. (a) (0°, 0°); (b) (0.05°, 0°); (c) (0°, 0.05°); (d) (-0.05°, 0°); (e) (0°, -0.05°); (f) (0.1°, 0°); (g) (0°, 0.1°); (h) (-0.1°, 0°); (i) (0°, -0.1°)
    Results of image restoration using Wiener filters under different field coordinates for sparse aperture optical system. (a) (0°, 0°); (b) (0.05°, 0°); (c) (0°, 0.05°); (d) (-0.05°, 0°); (e) (0°, -0.05°); (f) (0.1°, 0°); (g) (0°, 0.1°); (h) (-0.1°, 0°); (i) (0°, -0.1°)
    Results of image restoration using Wiener filters under different field coordinates for full aperture optical system. (a) (0°, 0°); (b) (0.05°, 0°); (c) (0°, 0.05°); (d) (-0.05°, 0°); (e) (0°, -0.05°); (f) (0.1°, 0°); (g) (0°, 0.1°); (h) (-0.1°, 0°); (i) (0°, -0.1°)
    Contrast curves before and after Wiener filtering under different field of view coordinates. (a) Field coordinate is (0°,0°); (b) field coordinate is (0.05°,0°); (c) field coordinate is (0°,0.05°); (d) field coordinate is (0.1°,0°)
    • Table 1. Field coordinates of Golay3 sparse aperture imaging system

      View table

      Table 1. Field coordinates of Golay3 sparse aperture imaging system

      NumberField of viewNumberField of view
      1(0°,0°)10(0.1°,0°)
      2(0.05°,0°)11(0.071°,0.071°)
      3(0.035°,0.035°)12(0°,0.1°)
      4(0°,0.05°)13(-0.071°,0.071°)
      5(-0.035°,0.035°)14(-0.1°,0°)
      6(-0.05°,0°)15(-0.071°,-0.071°)
      7(-0.035°,-0.035°)16(0°,-0.1°)
      8(0°,-0.05°)17(0.071°,-0.071°)
      9(-0.035°,0.035°)
    • Table 2. Fitting results of DZP coefficients for sub-mirror 1

      View table

      Table 2. Fitting results of DZP coefficients for sub-mirror 1

      jC1,j,1C1,j,2C1,j,3C1,j,4C1,j,5C1,j,6C1,j,7C1,j,8C1,j,9C1,j,10C1,j,11C1,j,12C1,j,13
      j=10.8530.5280.6590.6500.3470.3690.1100.4380.4060.6350.3060.4820.515
      j=20.052-10.2300.0310.0650.0110.0720.074-3.5890.009-0.005-0.0060.0030.018
      j=30.5390.003-10.8200.36620.005-0.191-3.7230.0030.0550.0000.085-0.0510.026
      j=40.1500.460-0.2590.3650.302-0.033-0.2250.3810.4150.5530.3850.3610.448
      j=50.5840.2360.7660.2420.7752.8392.2470.6430.6560.5400.3480.7740.954
      j=60.6740.9680.4630.6340.4470.9360.9660.3070.6070.5860.6210.2270.699
      j=70.017-0.0080.0110.0230.0040.0260.0260.0020.003-0.002-0.0020.0010.006
      j=80.1920.001-0.2190.1300.002-0.068-0.0450.0010.0200.0000.030-0.0180.009
      j=90.000-0.0090.0000.0000.0110.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
      j=10-0.0840.0030.110-0.0570.0010.0440.0330.000-0.0060.000-0.0080.0060.000
      j=11-0.5920.120-0.067-0.2680.079-0.009-0.0590.0990.1090.1440.1020.0950.117
      j=120.1470.0610.2080.0600.2020.6400.5900.1680.1710.1410.0910.2030.250
      j=130.1760.2530.1210.1660.0110.2450.2530.0810.1590.1530.1630.0590.183
      j=140.8840.076-1.0650.5960.120-0.458-0.3430.0050.0690.0000.088-0.0600.000
      j=150.5820.9940.6960.7550.8220.8340.5340.8150.1210.1470.2090.7380.333
    • Table 3. Fitting results of DZP coefficients for sub-mirror 2

      View table

      Table 3. Fitting results of DZP coefficients for sub-mirror 2

      jC2,j,1C2,j,2C2,j,3C2,j,4C2,j,5C2,j,6C2,j,7C2,j,8C2,j,9C2,j,10C2,j,11C2,j,12C2,j,13
      j=10.9280.2790.1330.6070.2950.3470.8170.3540.2060.2700.4750.3420.220
      j=2-0.017-10.250-0.007-0.001-0.003-0.018-0.041-3.619-0.0140.0030.0100.008-0.017
      j=30.000-0.003-10.20-0.002-0.0030.002-3.582-0.0050.0060.002-0.0020.006-0.004
      j=40.2380.9940.5360.3430.5690.4930.8720.5940.2420.2370.5340.3290.243
      j=50.7750.3640.7620.5360.5590.8550.3760.2840.6870.2070.27800.9410.328
      j=60.1631.0010.6930.5041.0180.3610.8480.8600.5870.1490.4250.4910.625
      j=7-0.002-0.0130.0000.0030.001-0.006-0.014-0.007-0.0050.0010.0040.003-0.006
      j=80.0020.0010.0020.0010.0000.0010.005-0.0010.0020.001-0.0010.002-0.001
      j=90.0000.0060.0000.016-0.004-0.006-0.005-0.0060.0000.0010.0010.000-0.009
      j=100.0000.0070.0000.0070.0010.0020.011-0.0040.0000.000-0.0010.000-0.003
      j=11-0.5690.2600.140-0.2730.1480.1280.2280.1550.0630.0620.1400.0860.063
      j=120.2030.0950.1990.1400.1460.1170.0980.0740.1800.0540.0730.2470.085
      j=130.0430.2610.1810.1310.1600.0940.2210.2250.1540.0390.1110.1290.163
      j=140.0000.1370.0020.0890.0760.0780.2690.0350.0000.0000.0520.0000.168
      j=150.7460.6560.8240.2760.9590.3520.1300.4510.8690.8530.4890.2350.184
    • Table 4. Fitting results of DZP coefficients for sub-mirror 3

      View table

      Table 4. Fitting results of DZP coefficients for sub-mirror 3

      jC3,j,1C3,j,2C3,j,3C3,j,4C3,j,5C3,j,6C3,j,7C3,j,8C3,j,9C3,j,10C3,j,11C3,j,12C3,j,13
      j=11.0550.7360.2320.6190.6080.8030.4170.3960.2520.6100.5970.5600.1882
      j=20.012-10.2100.0040.010-0.0110.0050.014-3.604-0.003-0.015-0.0010.019-0.0152
      j=3-0.0190.005-10.200-0.0380.002-0.001-3.5900.034-0.0000.0010.0030.0110.000
      j=40.350-0.1090.6220.3540.2170.8900.5240.0590.2820.5290.6400.5190.113
      j=50.3300.1160.5390.5360.8120.4230.2920.7310.3090.3480.2280.7990.151
      j=60.9850.0470.4861.0140.4030.8710.8520.6000.2430.4740.8280.4920.253
      j=70.0000.002-0.0010.001-0.0020.0010.004-0.002-0.001-0.005-0.0010.007-0.005
      j=8-0.0050.0000.002-0.012-0.0000.0000.0020.0120.0000.0000.0010.0040.000
      j=90.0210.000-0.0030.002-0.0060.0000.0210.007-0.003-0.0020.0150.0070.000
      j=100.0120.000-0.0010.0010.000-0.0010.0040.0020.0010.0010.0050.0000.000
      j=11-0.539-0.0280.162-0.2700.0570.2330.1370.0150.0740.1380.1680.1350.029
      j=120.0860.0300.1410.1400.2120.0050.0760.1910.0810.0910.0590.2090.040
      j=130.2570.0120.1270.265-0.0010.2280.2220.1570.0630.1240.2160.1290.067
      j=140.1950.0000.0650.0410.0870.0060.1720.0740.0310.0160.0850.0320.000
      j=150.6560.8240.2760.9590.3520.1300.4510.8690.7300.9040.1830.1730.106
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Junliu Fan, Quanying Wu, Baohua Chen, Lei Chen, Jun Wang, Senmiao Wang, Xiaoyi Chen. Multi-Field-of-View Sparse Aperture Imaging Based on Double Zernike Polynomials[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(10): 1011001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Imaging Systems

    Received: Oct. 21, 2022

    Accepted: Dec. 27, 2022

    Published Online: May. 9, 2023

    The Author Email: Wu Quanying (wqycyh@mail.usts.edu.cn), Chen Lei (chenlei@mail.njust.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS221860

    Topics