Photonics Research, Volume. 9, Issue 5, 792(2021)
1.3 GHz E-O bandwidth GaN-based micro-LED for multi-gigabit visible light communication EIC Choice Award , Editors' Pick
Fig. 1. E-O bandwidths versus current densities for the non-polar LED, semi-polar LED, and polar LED comparison between different reports.
Fig. 2. (a) Schematic of the epitaxial structure of the wetting layer LED. (b) A 10 μm × 10 μm AFM image of the bare wetting layer sample. (c) A 1.5 μm × 1.5 μm AFM image of the nano-structured wetting layer. (d) A high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscope (HAADF STEM) image of the LED sample. (e) A magnified bright-field (BF) STEM image of the wetting layer region.
Fig. 3. (a) 3D view of the designed cross-sectional structure for the micro-LED. (b) The image of the top view of the mesa/anode (75 μm/100 μm in diameter) for the micro-LED observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7000F).
Fig. 4. (a) Light-current density-voltage (
Fig. 5. Schematic of the micro-LED-based VLC system in a typical indoor environment over 3-m link.
Fig. 6. (a) Photograph of the micro-LED-based VLC system in a typical indoor environment. (b) Wetting layer micro-LED-based transmitter and (c) APD module-based receiver.
Fig. 7. (a) TDPL spectra of the sample. The inset is a photograph of the sample excited by the laser. (b) The temperature dependence of peak wavelength and FWHM. (c) TRPL measurement. (d) Calculated
Fig. 8. (a) E-O bandwidth of the wetting layer micro-LED on wafer measurement for different current densities. (b) Original normalized frequency response. Inset: the device under RF GS micro-probe was observed by optical microscope.
Fig. 9. (a) Normalized frequency responses of the VLC system with various current densities. (b) The extracted 3-dB modulation bandwidth and received optical power.
Fig. 10. Comparison of optical power between the emitter side and the receiver side and the
Fig. 11. (a) Data rates versus BER for the experimentally obtained results and the eye diagrams of (b) 1.0 Gbps, (c) 1.2 Gbps, (d) 1.4 Gbps, (e) 1.6 Gbps, (f) 1.8 Gbps, and (g) 2.0 Gbps data rates at the driving current density of
Fig. 12. SNR versus data rate of the micro-LED-based VLC system using NRZ-OOK format at different current densities.
Fig. 13. (a) Data rate and related BER of QPSK-OFDM at different current densities and the constellation diagrams with the data rate change of (b) 1 Gbps, (c) 2 Gbps, (d) 3 Gbps, and (e) 4 Gbps at the current density of
Fig. 14. Corresponding frequency spectrograms with the data rate change from 1 to 4 Gbps at the current density of
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Lei Wang, Zixian Wei, Chien-Ju Chen, Lai Wang, H. Y. Fu, Li Zhang, Kai-Chia Chen, Meng-Chyi Wu, Yuhan Dong, Zhibiao Hao, Yi Luo, "1.3 GHz E-O bandwidth GaN-based micro-LED for multi-gigabit visible light communication," Photonics Res. 9, 792 (2021)
Category: Optoelectronics
Received: Oct. 5, 2020
Accepted: Feb. 2, 2021
Published Online: May. 7, 2021
The Author Email: Lai Wang (wanglai@tsinghua.edu.cn), H. Y. Fu (hyfu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn), Meng-Chyi Wu (mcwu@ee.nthu.edu.tw)