Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 2, 0210001(2022)

Variational Mode Decomposition and Wavelet Threshold Function De-Noising for Second Harmonics

Ruilin Zhang and Xinghua Tu*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Electronic and Optical Engineering & College of Microelectronics, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(9)
    Second harmonic signals. (a) Original second harmonic spectrum; (b) Fourier transform frequency distribution of original second harmonic curve; (c) second harmonic spectrum with noise; (d) Fourier transform frequency distribution of noisy second harmonic curve
    Relationship between balance parameter and SNR of the first mode component of the second harmonic signal with different noise intensity. (a) SNR of noise signal is -7.6300 dB; (b) SNR of noise signal is -4.7368 dB; (c) SNR of noise signal is -2.7133 dB; (d) SNR of noise signal is -0.3417 dB; (e) SNR of noise signal is 2.6703 dB; (f) SNR of noise signal is 4.7096 dB; (g) SNR of noise signal is 7.1441 dB; (h) SNR of noise signal is 10.1235 dB
    Intrinsic mode components of noisy signals and their corresponding spectra. (a) IMF1; (b) IMF2; (c) IMF3; (d) IMF4; (e) frequency distribution of IMF1; (f) frequency distribution of IMF2; (g) frequency distribution of IMF3; (h) frequency distribution of IMF4
    Effect graph of VMD-WTFD
    Denoising effects of different algorithms. (a) EMD-WTFD; (b) EEMD-WTFD; (c) CEEMDAN-WTFD; (d) WTFD
    Relationship between second harmonic amplitude and CO concentration before denoising
    Relationship between second harmonic amplitude and CO concentration after denoising
    • Table 1. Correlation coefficients between four modal components of noise signal and original signal

      View table

      Table 1. Correlation coefficients between four modal components of noise signal and original signal

      Intrinsic mode componentIMF1IMF2IMF3IMF4
      Correlation coefficient0.97690.00030.00010
    • Table 2. Comparison of denoising performance of various methods

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of denoising performance of various methods

      IndexBefore denoisingEMD-WTFDEEMD-WTFDCEEMDAN-WTFDWTFDVMD-WTFD
      -7.425011.045311.088310.967810.655612.7601
      -2.486715.079215.658114.857915.711216.0574
      SNR /dB-0.023916.703516.709416.154618.247618.9942
      2.278218.227217.974318.406619.469321.2155
      7.456622.709823.516923.604323.921224.7941
      9.964726.086626.090426.124925.983626.9643
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ruilin Zhang, Xinghua Tu. Variational Mode Decomposition and Wavelet Threshold Function De-Noising for Second Harmonics[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(2): 0210001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Image Processing

    Received: May. 27, 2021

    Accepted: Aug. 9, 2021

    Published Online: Dec. 29, 2021

    The Author Email: Tu Xinghua (tuxh@njupt.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.0210001

    Topics