Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 6, 0618022(2024)

Multifocus Microscopic Image Fusion Algorithm

Hongyu Fu1,2, Yan Gong1,2、*, Luhan Wang2, Yanwei Zhang2, Song Lang2, Zhi Zhang2, and Hanqing Zheng2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering (Suzhou), University of Science and Technology of China, Suzhou 215163, Jiangsu , China
  • 2Medical Optical Research Laboratory, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215163, Jiangsu , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Flowchart of the proposed algorithm
    Photograph of wide-field-of-view high-resolution microscope system[19]
    Multifocus microscopic image sequence of ant. (a)‒(j) The 1st to the 10th ant-mounted microscopic images
    Multifocus microscopic image sequence of pogonatum. (a)‒(j) The 1st to the 10th pogonatum-mounted microscopic images
    Multifocus microscopic image sequence of charophyte. (a)‒(m) The 1st to the 13th charophyte-mounted microscopic images
    Comparison of fusion results among different methods. (a) Ant fusion results; (b) pogonatum fusion results; (c) charophyte fusion results
    Comparison of local magnification results among different methods. (a) Local magnification results of ant; (b) local magnification results of pogonatum; (c) local magnification results of charophyte
    • Table 1. Comparison of evaluation indexes of different methods for ant

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of evaluation indexes of different methods for ant

      MethodSTDPSNRSSIMMIQG
      RP35.676077.39790.88833.76100.1849
      DWT35.845277.21620.89013.60810.1858
      NSCT35.787177.37610.92303.82440.2069
      MWGF36.080676.85920.87203.78150.1528
      DCT-SVD35.495177.56620.92303.93520.1470
      Proposed method38.383679.76960.94404.35800.1878
    • Table 2. Comparison of evaluation indexes of different methods for pogonatum

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of evaluation indexes of different methods for pogonatum

      MethodSTDPSNRSSIMMIQG
      RP37.034675.28090.88302.60740.1812
      DWT37.144975.14730.88392.43310.1837
      NSCT37.104075.23810.88192.66390.2054
      MWGF39.068376.61510.90512.77430.1577
      DCT-SVD36.158175.50400.90642.73310.1491
      Proposed method41.519377.99230.94032.87200.1774
    • Table 3. Comparison of evaluation indexes of different methods for charophyte

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of evaluation indexes of different methods for charophyte

      MethodSTDPSNRSSIMMIQG
      RP24.023781.30830.89383.59640.2059
      DWT24.188581.02450.89403.45690.2013
      NSCT24.210481.12300.89123.61810.2305
      MWGF24.762583.61190.94243.96240.1757
      DCT-SVD24.851682.77930.93463.91380.1786
      Proposed method25.217784.47940.94984.16920.2206
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hongyu Fu, Yan Gong, Luhan Wang, Yanwei Zhang, Song Lang, Zhi Zhang, Hanqing Zheng. Multifocus Microscopic Image Fusion Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(6): 0618022

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Microscopy

    Received: Aug. 31, 2023

    Accepted: Oct. 13, 2023

    Published Online: Mar. 29, 2024

    The Author Email: Gong Yan (gongy@sibet.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP232015

    Topics