Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 58, Issue 14, 1415001(2021)

Stereo Matching Method Based on Gated Recurrent Unit Networks

Hongzhi Du, Teng Zhang, Yanbiao Sun, Linghui Yang, and Jigui Zhu*
Author Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Proposed network structure
    GRU structure
    Stacked GRU structure
    Result of the disparity estimation. (a) Left images; (b) stacked GRU; (c) proposed method; (d) ground truth
    Result of the disparity estimation on KITTI2015 test dataset. (a) Left image; (b) PSMNet; (c) proposed method
    • Table 1. Parameters of recurrent aggregation module

      View table

      Table 1. Parameters of recurrent aggregation module

      OperationLayer settingOutput size
      input1/4H×1/4W×64
      GRU_1K=3×3,C=321/4H×1/4W×32
      GRU_2K=3×3,C=321/4H×1/4W×32
      Conv_1K=3×3,C=48,S=21/8H×1/8W×48
      Conv_2K=3×3,C=64,S=21/16H×1/16W×64
      GRU_3K=3×3,C=641/16H×1/16W×64
      Deconv_1K=4×4,C=48,S=21/8H×1/8W×48
      add(Conv_1)K=3×3,C=48,S=11/8H×1/8W×48
      Deconv_2K=4×4,C=32,S=21/4H×1/4W×32
      add(Conv_2)K=3×3,C=32,S=11/4H×1/4W×32
      Conv_3K=3×3,C=8,S=11/4H×1/4W×8
      Conv_4K=3×3,C=1,S=11/4H×1/4W×1
    • Table 2. Comparison of different cost aggregation modules

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of different cost aggregation modules

      ModuleEep /pixelR1 /%R3 /%
      Stacked GRU1.716.297.79
      Proposed method1.212.014.99
    • Table 3. Performance evaluation of different methods on Scene Flow test dataset

      View table

      Table 3. Performance evaluation of different methods on Scene Flow test dataset

      MethodEep /pixelMemory /GBtrun /ms
      DispNetC[3]1.681.6218.7
      PSMNet[7]1.094.65399.3
      GANet[8]0.846.652251.1
      Proposed method1.222.57326.8
    • Table 4. Evaluation of different method on KITTI2015 test dataset

      View table

      Table 4. Evaluation of different method on KITTI2015 test dataset

      MethodAllNoc
      ED1-bg /%ED1-fg /%ED1-all /%ED1-bg /%ED1-fg /%ED1-all /%
      DispNetC[3]4.324.414.344.113.724.05
      MADNet[18]3.759.204.663.458.414.27
      CRL[4]2.483.592.672.323.122.45
      FADNet[5]2.683.502.822.493.072.59
      GC-Net[6]2.216.162.872.025.582.61
      PSMNet[7]1.864.622.321.714.312.14
      Proposed method2.204.852.641.824.092.20
    • Table 5. Evaluation of different methods on KITTI2012 test dataset unit: %

      View table

      Table 5. Evaluation of different methods on KITTI2012 test dataset unit: %

      Method>2 pixel>3 pixel>4 pixel>5 pixelAvg.error
      NocAllNocAllNocAllNocAllNocAll
      DispNetC7.388.114.114.652.773.202.052.390.91.0
      FADNet3.984.632.422.861.732.061.341.620.60.7
      GC-Net2.713.461.772.301.361.771.121.460.60.7
      PSMNet2.443.011.491.891.121.420.901.150.50.6
      GANet1.892.501.191.600.911.230.761.020.40.5
      Proposed method2.393.031.481.911.101.430.871.140.50.5
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hongzhi Du, Teng Zhang, Yanbiao Sun, Linghui Yang, Jigui Zhu. Stereo Matching Method Based on Gated Recurrent Unit Networks[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1415001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: Sep. 21, 2020

    Accepted: Nov. 14, 2020

    Published Online: Jul. 8, 2021

    The Author Email: Zhu Jigui (jiguizhu@tju.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP202158.1415001

    Topics