Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 51, Issue 3, 0311003(2022)

Comparison on Performance of Deep Q Network based Single-pixel Imaging Using Different Orthogonal Transformations

Zhirun WANG1, Wenjing ZHAO1, Aiping ZHAI1, and Dong WANG1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Physics and Optoelectronics,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024,China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control Systems,Ministry of Education and Shanxi Province,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024,China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Spectrum of “Cameraman” image with the resolution of 64×64
    Flow of DQN-SPI
    The reconstructed "Cameraman" images using different down-sampling strategies at different sampling ratios
    The spectrum of the reconstructed "Cameraman" images using different down-sampling strategies at different sampling ratios
    Reconstruction at low sampling ratios
    S(k) curve of DSPI,FSPI,HSPI and KMSPI
    Schematic of the experimental setup
    The reconstructed images of "tortoise" using different down-sampling strategies at different sampling ratios
    • Table 1. PSNR and SSIM of the reconstructed “Cameraman” images using different down-sampling strategies

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. PSNR and SSIM of the reconstructed “Cameraman” images using different down-sampling strategies

      Sampling ratio
      Method5%10%20%40%
      PNSR/dBAZ-HSPI15.0415.8016.4322.06
      DQN-HSPI19.6821.2323.9127.84
      AC-FSPI17.1318.1922.6223.35
      DQN-FSPI20.5422.5625.2428.49
      AZ-DSPI14.7915.4819.2923.28
      DQN-DSPI20.5622.6325.1329.22
      AS-KMSPI11.4013.8817.5923.45
      DQN-KMSPI14.6018.2522.8126.27
      SSIM /%AZ-HSPI45.857.070.582.3
      DQN-HSPI55.565.276.688.2
      AC-FSPI54.169.281.190.2
      DQN-FSPI64.675.785.191.3
      AZ-DSPI45.258.171.881.1
      DQN-DSPI65.474.383.090.7
      AS-KMSPI22.830.044.280.0
      DQN-KMSPI47.660.078.687.0
    • Table 2. PSNR and SSIM of the reconstructed images of "tortoise" using different down-sampling strategies

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. PSNR and SSIM of the reconstructed images of "tortoise" using different down-sampling strategies

      Sampling ratio
      Method5%10%20%40%
      PNSR/dBAZ-HSPI18.0319.5621.7224.82
      DQN-HSPI19.8721.9524.2027.41
      AC-FSPI17.8520.0022.5126.40
      DQN-FSPI19.6622.0624.7629.08
      AZ-DSPI18.6519.8322.9626.36
      DQN-DSPI20.4522.5925.5330.09
      AS-KMSPI10.4615.2719.0825.13
      DQN-KMSPI15.2118.0718.6325.76
      SSIM/%AZ-HSPI52.065.778.788.6
      DQN-HSPI70.980.186.291.1
      AC-FSPI56.972.283.792.0
      DQN-FSPI73.083.490.896.3
      AZ-DSPI62.173.984.594.2
      DQN-DSPI78.585.692.296.9
      AS-KMSPI32.049.766.792.8
      DQN-KMSPI69.080.083.792.3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zhirun WANG, Wenjing ZHAO, Aiping ZHAI, Dong WANG. Comparison on Performance of Deep Q Network based Single-pixel Imaging Using Different Orthogonal Transformations[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(3): 0311003

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Jul. 28, 2021

    Accepted: Sep. 9, 2021

    Published Online: Apr. 8, 2022

    The Author Email: WANG Dong (wangdong@tyut.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/gzxb20225103.0311003

    Topics