Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 51, Issue 5, 20210406(2022)
Research progress of absolute distance measurement methods based on tunable laser frequency sweeping interference
Figures & Tables(16)
Fig. 1. Schematic of laser ranging of frequency sweeping interferometer
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of calculating the interference signal phase difference. (a) Ideal linear frequency sweeping; (b) Actual nonlinear frequency sweeping
Fig. 4. VCSEL frequency sweeping ranging system based on PLL control[33]
Fig. 5. Nonlinear frequency sweeping compensation system based on Hilbert transform[37]
Fig. 6. Resampling frequency sweeping interferometry ranging based on hardware[40]
Fig. 7. Compensation of non-linear frequency sweeping based on F-P cavity and M-Z interferometer[44]
Fig. 9. Frequency sweeping ranging system based on double swept and gas chamber calibration[60]
Fig. 10. Double swept interferometric ranging based on four wave mixing[63]
Fig. 11. Frequency sweeping ranging system based on Doppler velocimeter[66]
Fig. 12. FSI system for suppressing Doppler amplification dynamic error[77]
Table 1. Comparison of ranging accuracy of active frequency stabilized FSI system
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Comparison of ranging accuracy of active frequency stabilized FSI system
Author Distance/mm Standard deviation Relative error Ref. Iiyama 200 1.3 mm - [ 29 ]Kakuma 14 0.12 µm 0.9×10−5 [ 32 -33 ]Deng 40 7 µm 7.5×10−5 [ 35 ]Zhu 40 2.4 µm 9.7×10−5 [ 36 ]
Table 2. Comparison of ranging accuracy of passive compensation FSI system
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Comparison of ranging accuracy of passive compensation FSI system
Author Distance/m Standard deviation Relative error FWHM Ref. Ahn - - - 177.4 cm [ 37 ]Yuksel - - - 0.4 cm [ 38 ]Jiang 5 4.64 µm - - [ 41 ]Liu 3 2.4 µm 1.1×10-4 - [ 42 ]Meng 26 - 1.0×10-4 50 µm [ 39 ]
Table 3. Comparison of FSI system ranging accuracy for compensating vibration drift
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Comparison of FSI system ranging accuracy for compensating vibration drift
Author Distance/m Standard deviation/µm Relative error FWHM Ref. Yang 0.7 - - 50 nm [ 52 ]Martinez 0.4 21 - - [ 63 ]Tao 0.66 0.48 - - [ 61 -62 ]Zhang 3 11 - - [ 75 ]Prellinger 4 11 6.0×10−7 - [ 64 -65 ]Kakuma 11 4 3.6×10−4 - [ 59 ]Swinkels 15 - 1.3×10−4 - [ 53 ]Le Floch 15 - - 50 µm [ 55 -56 ]Lu 16 3.15 - 65.5 µm [ 66 ]Dale 20 - 0.4×10−6 40 nm [ 60 ]Pollinger 20 - 5.1×10−7 12 µm [ 57 ]
Table 4. Comparison of FSI system ranging accuracy for compensating dispersion mismatch
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Comparison of FSI system ranging accuracy for compensating dispersion mismatch
Author Distance/m Standard deviation Relative error FWHM Ref. Barber 100 - 1×10−7 - [ 80 -81 ]Xu 2.53 - 1.3×10−4 - [ 82 -83 ]Pan 8 - - 45 [ 84 ]Shi 6.7 34 - - [ 85 ]
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Luming Song, Fumin Zhang, Dong Sun, Hongyi Lin, Xiaohua Huang, Miao Yu, Qian Zhang. Research progress of absolute distance measurement methods based on tunable laser frequency sweeping interference[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(5): 20210406
Paper Information
Category: Photoelectric measurement
Received: Jun. 15, 2021
Accepted: --
Published Online: Jun. 14, 2022
The Author Email:
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20