Analysis of Teachers' Actions Using Feature Dense Computation and Fusion Algorithm

Xiaolong Zhang; Jianfei Liu; Luguo Hao

doi:10.3788/LOP56.161503

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 56, Issue 16, 161503(2019)

Analysis of Teachers' Actions Using Feature Dense Computation and Fusion Algorithm

Xiaolong Zhang¹, Jianfei Liu^1、*, and Luguo Hao²

Author Affiliations

¹ School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

² School of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(7)

Fig. 1. Schematic of TSDCFN structure. (a) Overall structure of TSDCFN; (b) structure of densely connected module (in which, w/o represents without)

Download full size

Fig. 2. Spatiotemporal pyramid pooling model

Download full size

Fig. 3. Scheme of spatiotemporal and non-local feature computation

Download full size

Fig. 4. Relationship between recognition accuracy and Epoch No.

Download full size

Fig. 5. Examples of recognition effects of action videos

Download full size

Table 1. Parameters of modified 3D densely connected convolutional neural network

View table

Table 1. Parameters of modified 3D densely connected convolutional neural network

Layer	Output size	3D DenseNet
3D Convolution	D×H×W	3×3×3 conv
Dense block 1	D×H×W	$\begin{matrix} [\begin{matrix} 1 \times 1 \times 1 conv \\ 3 \times 3 \times 3 conv \end{matrix}] \end{matrix}$ ×10
Transition layer 1	D×H×W	1×1×1 conv
Transition layer 1	D× $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{2} \end{matrix}$	1×2×2 max pooling
Dense block 2	D× $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{2} \end{matrix}$	$\begin{matrix} [\begin{matrix} 1 \times 1 \times 1 conv \\ 3 \times 3 \times 3 conv \end{matrix}] \end{matrix}$ ×10
Transition layer 2	D× $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{2} \end{matrix}$	1×1×1 conv
Transition layer 2	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	2×2×2 max pooling
Dense block 3	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	$\begin{matrix} [\begin{matrix} 1 \times 1 \times 1 conv \\ 3 \times 3 \times 3 conv \end{matrix}] \end{matrix}$ ×10
Transition w/opooling layer 1	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	1×1×1 conv
Dense block 4	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	$\begin{matrix} [\begin{matrix} 1 \times 1 \times 1 conv \\ 3 \times 3 \times 3 conv \end{matrix}] \end{matrix}$ ×10
Transition w/opooling layer 2	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	1×1×1 conv
Dense block 5	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	$\begin{matrix} [\begin{matrix} 1 \times 1 \times 1 conv \\ 3 \times 3 \times 3 conv \end{matrix}] \end{matrix}$ ×10
Transition w/opooling layer 3	$\begin{matrix} \frac{D}{2} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{H}{4} \end{matrix}$ × $\begin{matrix} \frac{W}{4} \end{matrix}$	1×1×1 conv
Classification layer		fully connected
Classification layer		softmax and prediction

Table 2. Test results of networks with different configuration parameters on dataset of teachers' actions (in which, Data Aug represents Data Augmentation)

View table

Table 2. Test results of networks with different configuration parameters on dataset of teachers' actions (in which, Data Aug represents Data Augmentation)

Method	d	k	θ	L	Data Aug	Accuracy /%
3D DenseNet	30	24	0.5	32	-	85.62
Modified 3D DenseNet	58	48	1.0	16	-	91.44
Modified 3D DenseNet with non-localfeature computation block	58	48	1.0	32	-	93.02
Modified 3D DenseNet with spatio-temporally pyramid pooling	58	48	1.0	-	-	93.76
TSDCFN with non-local feature computationblock and spatio temporal pyramid pooling	58	48	1.0	-	-	96.87
	58	48	1.0	-	√	98.13

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Xiaolong Zhang, Jianfei Liu, Luguo Hao. Analysis of Teachers' Actions Using Feature Dense Computation and Fusion Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(16): 161503

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Machine Vision

Received: Feb. 25, 2019

Accepted: Mar. 27, 2019

Published Online: Aug. 5, 2019

The Author Email: Liu Jianfei (jfliu@hebut.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3788/LOP56.161503

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology