Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 39, Issue 11, 1122002(2019)

Optimal Design of Stray Light Suppression Structure for Ultra-Light Space Camera

Mengqi Shao1,2、*, Lei Zhang1,3、**, Lei Wei3, and Xuezhi Jia3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Optical-Mechanical Structure Research Laboratory, Chang Guang Satellite Technology Co., LTD, Changchun, Jilin 130031, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Parameters pertinent to design of vanes of the primary mirror baffle
    Initial structure of primary mirror baffle
    Finite element model and structural parameters of primary mirror baffle
    Nephograms of x- and y-direction vibration modes of fundamental frequency of baffle. (a) x direction; (b) y direction
    Iteration process of object optimization. (a) Iterative curve of mass; (b) iterative curve of structural compliance
    Scene of random vibration test
    Frequency response curve of random vibration of sampling point. (a) x axis; (b) y axis; (c) z axis
    Model for tray light analysis
    PST curves of optical system in x and y directions. (a) PST curve in x direction; (b) PST curve in y direction
    • Table 1. Performance parameters of CFRP

      View table

      Table 1. Performance parameters of CFRP

      MatetialLongitudinal tensile elastic modulus /GPaLateral tensile elastic modulus /GPaLongitudinal Poisson's ratioLateral Poisson's ratioShear modulus /GPa
      CFRP230.009.300.276.656.20
    • Table 2. Designed variables and optimized results

      View table

      Table 2. Designed variables and optimized results

      VariableRange /mmInitial value /mmOptimization result /mmAmended result /mm
      Tt1[0.2,0.6]0.50.590.48
      Tt2[0.2,0.6]0.50.260.24
      Tt3[0.2,0.6]0.50.220.24
      Tt4[0.2,0.6]0.50.230.24
      Tt5[0.2,0.6]0.50.240.24
      Tt6[0.2,0.6]0.50.370.48
      Ton[0.6,1.0]1.00.670.72
      Tunder[0.6,1.0]1.00.980.98
      Trib[0.2,0.6]0.50.230.24
      Tdgh[0.2,0.6]0.50.340.24
    • Table 3. Structural performance comparisonbefore and after optimization

      View table

      Table 3. Structural performance comparisonbefore and after optimization

      Performancef1 /Hzf1 /HzCompliance /(N·mm)Mass /g
      Initial value95117.90.03397.5
      Optimization result125.2146.70.01243.8
      Improvement /%31.7924.466.638.6
    • Table 4. Test conditions of random vibration

      View table

      Table 4. Test conditions of random vibration

      Frequency /HzPower spectral density /(g2·Hz-1)Acceleration root mean square /g
      100.00003.56
      800.0100
      8000.0100
      80000.0016
    • Table 5. Comparison between test and analysis data

      View table

      Table 5. Comparison between test and analysis data

      DirectionComparison results of frequency scanning test with modal analysisComparison results of random vibration test with analysis
      Analysis value of fundamental frequency /HzTest value of fundamental frequency /HzRelative error /%Analysis value of acceleration response /gTest value of acceleration response /gRelative error /%
      x125.20125.390.1512.8411.2012.70
      y146.70128.4212.4611.208.9910.30
      z609.67635.454.2310.9010.117.80
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Mengqi Shao, Lei Zhang, Lei Wei, Xuezhi Jia. Optimal Design of Stray Light Suppression Structure for Ultra-Light Space Camera[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(11): 1122002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Optical Design and Fabrication

    Received: Jun. 12, 2019

    Accepted: Jul. 24, 2019

    Published Online: Nov. 6, 2019

    The Author Email: Shao Mengqi (18300608158@163.com), Zhang Lei (18686344285@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS201939.1122002

    Topics