Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications, Volume. 19, Issue 1, 2023010(2023)

Sorting microplastics from other materials in water samples by ultra-high-definition imaging

Kai-Erik Peiponen1, Boniphace Kanyathare1, Blaž Hrovat2, Nikolaos Papamatthaiakis3, Joni Hattuniemi4, Benjamin Asamoah1, Antti Haapala3,5, Arto Koistinen2, and Matthieu Roussey1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics and Mathematics, Center for Photonics Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland
  • 2Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • 3School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland
  • 4Valmet Automation Inc., Kehräämöntie 3, 87400 Kajaani, Finland
  • 5FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, 85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(7)
    Images acquired with Valmet FS5 UHD device for different samples in water including (a) PA particles, (b) PP particles, and (c) LDPE particles. (d) Zoomed-in and enhanced image of a microplastic particle from (c) (red contour). Red arrows in (d) highlight bright “lensing” areas in the microplastic particle. Black arrows in (d) highlights a hole in the MP. (e) Air bubbles on a PET MP. (f) Procedure to image and recognize MPs in a water sample.
    Processed images in order to highlight the different plastic microparticles (a) PS and (b) UPVC plastic particles. Highlight on UPVC particle: (c) original cropped image and (d) contoured image showing an irregular-cut pyramid due to the grinding.
    Isolating MP from the acquired images and extracting an estimation of the projected surface area of the particle. (a) Original image, (b) cropped image, (c) isolated MP, and (d) projected image of the MP in black and white allowing an estimation of the size.
    Image of MP extracted from Figure 2c (LDPE samples) showing opening, facets, or “lenses” in the particles.
    Example of a 1 – M map obtained from one snapshot captured by UHD FS5 device. It shows a human hair, a kinked soft wood fiber, a PP microplastic and an air bubble. Each particle is further analyzed in Figure 6.
    Intensity distribution analysis through 1 – M values for (a) a human hair, (b) a soft wood fiber, (c) a microplastic, and (d) an air bubble. Left: 1 – M maps. Middle and right: cross-section along the colored arrows or dashed lines shown on the 1 – M maps. Insets in (c) and (d) are zoom-in curves on the central part of the 1 – M cross-sections.
    • Table 1. Selected MP extracted from Figure 1 to estimate the surface area: Plastic types and corresponding figures from which the MP images have been extracted; isolated MPs without background; projected images for pixels counting; surface area of the MP.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Selected MP extracted from Figure 1 to estimate the surface area: Plastic types and corresponding figures from which the MP images have been extracted; isolated MPs without background; projected images for pixels counting; surface area of the MP.

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kai-Erik Peiponen, Boniphace Kanyathare, Blaž Hrovat, Nikolaos Papamatthaiakis, Joni Hattuniemi, Benjamin Asamoah, Antti Haapala, Arto Koistinen, Matthieu Roussey. Sorting microplastics from other materials in water samples by ultra-high-definition imaging[J]. Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications, 2023, 19(1): 2023010

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Nov. 22, 2022

    Accepted: Mar. 10, 2023

    Published Online: Aug. 29, 2023

    The Author Email: Roussey Matthieu (matthieu.roussey@uef.fi)

    DOI:10.1051/jeos/2023010

    Topics