Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 50, Issue 4, 46(2021)

Comparative Analysis of Metastable Helium Resonance Fluorescence Lidar Systems

Jiaxin LAN1...2, Ruocan ZHAO1,2, Tingyu PAN1,2, Xianghui XUE1,2, Tingdi CHEN1,2, Dongsong SUN1,2, and Zimu LI12 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science of Technology of China, Hefei230026, China
  • 2Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, Hefei3006, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(19)
    Effective backscatter cross section for the 1083 nm lines
    Saturation absorption spectrum of metastable Helium
    Density distribution model of metastable Helium
    Pulsed lidar system schematic
    Telescope beam path
    Combined transmission curve of FPI filter and interference filter
    Simulated receiving signal of pulsed lidar
    Simulated SNR of pulsed lidar
    Bistatic schematic of continuous lidar
    Continuous lidar system schematic
    FADOF schematic
    Combined transmission curve of FADOF and interference filter
    Simulated receiving signal of continuous lidar
    Simulated SNR of continuous lidar
    Simulated SNR of continuous lidar (range resolution is 50 km)
    Comparison of SNR between pulsed lidar and continuous lidar(W and S stand for winter and summer respectively, P and C stand for pulsed lidar and continuous lidar respectively)
    • Table 1. Parameters of pulsed lidar simulation

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Parameters of pulsed lidar simulation

      ParametersValue
      Laser power/W25
      Laser repetition/Hz20
      Telescope area/m24.712
      FP FWHM/GHz8.05
      Optical efficiency/%4
      Detector dark counts/(e-٠pixel-1٠s-1)0.001 5
      Integral time/h1
      Range resolution/km50
    • Table 2. Parameters of continuous lidar simulation

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Parameters of continuous lidar simulation

      ParametersValue
      Laser power/W25
      Laser divergence angle/mrad0.05
      Laser tilt angle/mrad4.8
      Telescope area/m24.712
      Field of view/mrad6.401
      FADOF FWHM/GHz8.05
      Optical efficiency/%6
      Detector dark counts/(e-·pixel-1·s-1)0.001 5
      Detector pixel array1 340×100
      Integral time/h1
    • Table 3. Comparison of parameters between pulsed lidar and continuous lidar

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of parameters between pulsed lidar and continuous lidar

      ParametersPulsed lidar systemContinuous lidar system
      Laser power/W2520
      Field of view/mrad0.16.401
      Filter FWHM/GHz8.052.3
      Filter peak transmittance0.60.9
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jiaxin LAN, Ruocan ZHAO, Tingyu PAN, Xianghui XUE, Tingdi CHEN, Dongsong SUN, Zimu LI. Comparative Analysis of Metastable Helium Resonance Fluorescence Lidar Systems[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(4): 46

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

    Received: Oct. 13, 2020

    Accepted: Dec. 21, 2020

    Published Online: May. 11, 2021

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/gzxb20215004.0401001

    Topics