Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 24, 2428005(2022)

Scene Classification of Remote Sensing Images Based on Wavelet-Spatial High-Order Feature Aggregation Network

Kang Ni1,2、*, Mingliang Zhai3, and Peng Wang4
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu , China
  • 2Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Big Data Security & Intelligent Processing, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu , China
  • 3College of Automation & College of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu , China
  • 4College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Results of feature extraction by max-pooling, average-pooling, and wavelet transform. (a) Remote sensing images; (b) max pooling; (c) average pooling; (d) wavelet transform
    Network architecture of proposed WHFA-Net
    Images of several classes from AID dataset. (a) Airport; (b) bare land; (c) bridge; (d) dense residential area; (e) farmland;(f) forest; (g) railway station; (h) square
    Images of several classes from NWPU45 dataset. (a) Airport; (b) beach; (c) church; (d) desert; (e) harbor; (f) lake; (g) mountain; (h) thermal power station
    Confusion matrix of scene classification on NWPU45 dataset under 10% training set ratio
    Confusion matrix of scene classification on NWPU45 dataset under 20% training set ratio
    Network curves on NWPU45 dataset under 10% training set ratio. (a) Loss-epoch curves; (b) Top1 error-epoch curves; (c) Top5 error-epoch curves
    Network curve on NWPU45 dataset under 20% training set ratio. (a) Loss-epoch curves; (b) Top1 error-epoch curves; (c) Top5 error-epoch curves
    Comparison of results of three branches
    • Table 1. Differences between proposed network and existing remote sensing image scene classification algorithms

      View table

      Table 1. Differences between proposed network and existing remote sensing image scene classification algorithms

      NetworkSpatial domainWavelet domianHigh-order feature extractionEnd-to-end training
      MSCP10××
      DCCNN19××
      APDC-Net13××
      Wavelet CNN20××
      SCCov14×
      WHFA-Net
    • Table 2. Comparison of scene classification accuracy of algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of scene classification accuracy of algorithms

      NetworkClassification accuracy of AIDClassification accuracy of NWPU45
      20% scence images50% scence images10% scence images20% scence images
      VGG-1686.59±0.2989.64±0.3676.47±0.1879.79±0.15
      DCCNN87.37±0.4191.49±0.2283.97±0.1985.63±0.18
      MSCP91.52±0.2194.42±0.1785.33±0.1788.93±0.14
      APDC-Net88.56±0.2992.15±0.2985.94±0.2287.84±0.26
      Wavelet CNN-96.65±0.2484.69±0.4488.84±0.38
      GBNet90.16±0.2493.72±0.34--
      LCNN-BFF91.66±0.4894.62±0.1686.53±0.1591.73±0.17
      WHFA-Net91.72±0.1996.14±0.1488.59±0.2191.84±0.13
    • Table 3. Ablation experimental results

      View table

      Table 3. Ablation experimental results

      Spatial domainWavelet domainHigher-order feature aggregationOA /%
      ××83.41
      ××83.98
      ×87.18
      ×87.61
      ×87.10
      88.59
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kang Ni, Mingliang Zhai, Peng Wang. Scene Classification of Remote Sensing Images Based on Wavelet-Spatial High-Order Feature Aggregation Network[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(24): 2428005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Apr. 26, 2022

    Accepted: Jun. 16, 2022

    Published Online: Dec. 14, 2022

    The Author Email: Ni Kang (tznikang@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.2428005

    Topics