Matter and Radiation at Extremes, Volume. 7, Issue 2, 024401(2022)

Numerical investigation of spallation neutrons generated from petawatt-scale laser-driven proton beams

B. Martinez1...2,*, S. N. Chen3, S. Bolaños1, N. Blanchot4, G. Boutoux2, W. Cayzac2, C. Courtois2, X. Davoine2,5, A. Duval2, V. Horny1,2, I. Lantuejoul2, L. Le Deroff4, P. E. Masson-Laborde2,5, G. Sary2,5, B. Vauzour2, R. Smets6, L. Gremillet2,5 and J. Fuchs1 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1LULI-CNRS, CEA, UPMC Univ Paris 06: Sorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, F-91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France
  • 2CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France
  • 3Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest–Magurele, Romania
  • 4CEA, DAM, CESTA, F-33114 Le Barp, France
  • 5Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, LMCE, 91680 Bruyères-le-Châtel, France
  • 6LPP, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, F-91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Energy-differential cross sections of proton-induced nuclear reactions releasing different numbers of neutrons (solid curves) and of total neutron production by photonuclear reactions (black dashed curve) in Pb, as given by the ENDF/B-VIII database.34
    Number of neutrons emitted per incident proton as a function of the target material and incident proton energy, as simulated by FLUKA.
    Conceptual setup of the numerical study.
    Longitudinal (x − px) phase space of the protons from the CALDER-CIRC simulation using the LMJ-PETAL parameters.
    Proton energy spectrum from the CALDER-CIRC simulation using the LMJ-PETAL laser parameters (blue curve). An experimental proton spectrum obtained at LMJ-PETAL (see the text for details) is plotted as orange dots.
    Proton acceleration using the 0.6 PW Apollon laser parameters: x − px proton phase spaces at (a) t = −20 fs and (b) t = +4 fs (here t = 0 corresponds to the on-target laser pulse maximum). The blue line is the laser-cycle-averaged longitudinal electric field 〈Ex〉, extracted on axis (y = 0) and normalized to (a) 100E0 or (b) 50E0 for readability (E0 = 3.2 × 1012 V m−1).
    Proton acceleration using the 6 PW Apollon laser parameters: x − px proton phase spaces at (a) t = −20 fs and (b) t = +4 fs (here t = 0 corresponds to the on-target laser pulse maximum). The blue line is the laser-cycle-averaged longitudinal electric field 〈Ex〉, extracted on axis (y = 0) and normalized to (a) 100E0 or (b) 50E0 for readability (E0 = 3.2 × 1012 V m−1).
    PIC-simulated proton spectra using (a) the 0.6 PW and (b) the 6 PW Apollon laser parameters. In (a), the integrated number of protons above 10 MeV is ∼1011, corresponding to a laser-to-proton energy conversion efficiency of ∼5%. In (b), there are 5 × 1011 protons above 20 MeV, corresponding to a ∼12% conversion efficiency.
    Energy-angle spectrum of the neutrons escaping from a 0.3-mm-thick Pb converter target for (a) LMJ-PETAL, (b) 0.6 PW Apollon, and (c) 6 PW Apollon laser parameters.
    Energy fraction of the incident protons dissipated by nuclear reactions (blue) and transmitted through the target (green) as a function of the thickness l of the Pb converter target for (a) LMJ-PETAL, (b) 0.6 PW Apollon, and (c) 6 PW Apollon laser parameters.
    (a) Number (normalized to unit solid angle) and (b) maximum flux of the neutrons crossing the rear side of the Pb converter target, as a function of its thickness l. The incident proton beam is that predicted by PIC simulations in the LMJ-PETAL and 0.6–6 PW Apollon cases, as labeled.
    (a) Time-dependent neutron flux across the Pb converter backside for the LMJ-PETAL parameters. (b) Neutron energy spectra from a l = 0.3 mm Pb target in the LMJ-PETAL and 0.6–6 PW Apollon cases.
    Transverse size vs duration of the simulated neutron beam in the LMJ-PETAL, 0.6 PW Apollon, and 6 PW Apollon cases, and for various thicknesses, as indicated.
    • Table 1. Projected range λ (cm) for protons in various materials and for various energies.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Projected range λ (cm) for protons in various materials and for various energies.

      Proton energy (MeV)AlCuAgPb
      250.3150.1170.1150.135
      501.080.3910.3800.435
      1003.701.311.261.43
      25017.96.285.976.64
      50055.019.118.119.9
      100015252.949.754.2
    • Table 2. Parameters of the 2D CALDER PIC simulations performed for each considered laser system.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Parameters of the 2D CALDER PIC simulations performed for each considered laser system.

      LaserWavelength (μm)Pulse duration (fs)Pulse energy (J)Pulse intensity (W/cm2)Target size and compositionSimulation mesh size (nm)
      0.5 PW LMJ-PETAL16103208 × 10185 μm CH and Al32
      0.6 PW Apollon0.820122 × 102164 nm CH3.2
      6 PW Apollon0.820120192 nm CH3.2
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    B. Martinez, S. N. Chen, S. Bolaños, N. Blanchot, G. Boutoux, W. Cayzac, C. Courtois, X. Davoine, A. Duval, V. Horny, I. Lantuejoul, L. Le Deroff, P. E. Masson-Laborde, G. Sary, B. Vauzour, R. Smets, L. Gremillet, J. Fuchs. Numerical investigation of spallation neutrons generated from petawatt-scale laser-driven proton beams[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(2): 024401

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Fundamental Physics At Extreme Light

    Received: Jun. 20, 2021

    Accepted: Nov. 30, 2021

    Published Online: Apr. 6, 2022

    The Author Email: Martinez B. (bertrand.martinez@tecnico.ulisboa.pt)

    DOI:10.1063/5.0060582

    Topics