Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 43, Issue 6, 0612005(2023)

Rapid Detection Method of Total Amount of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil Based on Fluorescence Imaging Technology

Gaoyong Shi1,2,3, Ruifang Yang2,3、*, Nanjing Zhao2,3、**, Liangchen Liu1,2,3, Jinqiang Yang1,2,3, Peng Huang2,3,4, Gaofang Yin2,3, Li Fang2,3, and Wenqing Liu2,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Environmental Science and Optoelectronic Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Optical Monitoring Technology for Environment of Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China
  • 4School of Biology, Food and Environment, Hefei University, Hefei 230601, Anhui, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Three-dimensional fluorescence spectra of oils. (a) Gasoline; (b) diesel fuel; (c) crude
    Spectral curve of 280 nm ultraviolet light source
    Spectral response range curve of CCD camera
    Transmissivity of filter
    Schematic diagram of fluorescence detection system
    Physical picture of prepared soil sheet
    Experimental system
    Fluorescence image of blank soil sample
    Fluorescence images of calibrated samples
    Calibration curve
    Fluorescence images of tested samples
    Fluorescence value curve of test samples
    • Table 1. Preparation of samples containing different mass fractions of oil

      View table

      Table 1. Preparation of samples containing different mass fractions of oil

      Mass fraction of oil in soil /%Mass of soil with 5% oil /gBlank /gMass fraction of oil in soil /%

      Mass of soil with 5%

      oil /g

      Blank /gMass fraction of oil in soil /%

      Mass of soil with 5%

      oil /g

      Blank /g
      0.10.29.81.02.08.01.93.86.2
      0.20.49.61.12.27.82.04.06.0
      0.30.69.41.22.47.62.14.25.8
      0.40.89.21.32.67.42.24.45.6
      0.51.09.01.42.87.22.34.65.4
      0.61.28.81.53.07.02.44.85.2
      0.71.48.61.63.26.82.55.05.0
      0.81.68.41.73.46.6
      0.91.88.21.83.66.4
    • Table 2. Results of 20 blank sample tests

      View table

      Table 2. Results of 20 blank sample tests

      Test No.ValueTest No.ValueTest No.ValueTest No.Value
      1100.3226100.43511100.45616100.363
      2100.3517100.38712100.48817100.419
      3100.4068100.48313100.44718100.534
      4100.3609100.41214100.52419100.439
      5100.32810100.43215100.46120100.373
    • Table 3. Mean fluorescence values of test samples

      View table

      Table 3. Mean fluorescence values of test samples

      Mass fraction /%0.200.300.400.500.700.800.901.001.101.20
      1 s103.591106.261106.766108.372111.059116.711120.969122.033126.043124.553
      2 s103.513106.032106.805107.786110.792115.417119.132121.410123.827124.182
      3 s103.555105.84106.819106.683110.701114.259119.451120.236122.073123.595
      4 s103.478105.596106.737106.449110.478113.839116.119119.765120.593122.460
      5 s103.484104.688106.837106.314110.401113.659115.624119.462120.015121.861
      Average103.524105.683106.793107.121110.686114.777118.259120.581122.510123.330
      Mass fraction /%1.301.401.601.701.802.002.102.202.302.40
      1 s132.123131.146132.636138.967139.740146.028149.549150.750153.684155.712
      2 s127.331127.694131.352136.203138.981144.371146.727149.326150.496153.831
      3 s124.318126.584130.977134.475137.335143.198144.942147.746148.372152.236
      4 s122.491124.013130.671132.904135.867141.501142.985146.318146.583150.487
      5 s120.811122.672129.552131.375134.441141.023141.295145.762144.741149.098
      Average125.415126.422131.038134.785137.273143.224145.099147.980148.775152.273
    • Table 4. Inversion mass fractions and deviations of test samples

      View table

      Table 4. Inversion mass fractions and deviations of test samples

      Mass fraction /10-6Mean fluorescenceInversion /10-6Deviation /%Mass fraction /10-6Mean fluorescenceInversion /10-6Deviation /%
      2000103.524295047.72813000125.415128301.275
      3000105.683393030.96114000126.422132905.081
      4000106.793443010.74016000131.038153703.925
      5000107.12145808.44817000134.785170600.371
      7000110.686619011.61718000137.273181901.033
      8000114.77780300.41320000143.224202304.360
      9000118.25996006.71821000145.099208703.420
      10000120.581106506.52722000147.980217204.630
      11000122.510115204.75823000148.775230201.640
      12000123.330118900.88824000152.273233803.983
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Gaoyong Shi, Ruifang Yang, Nanjing Zhao, Liangchen Liu, Jinqiang Yang, Peng Huang, Gaofang Yin, Li Fang, Wenqing Liu. Rapid Detection Method of Total Amount of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil Based on Fluorescence Imaging Technology[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 0612005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

    Received: Jul. 7, 2022

    Accepted: Aug. 9, 2022

    Published Online: Mar. 13, 2023

    The Author Email: Yang Ruifang (rfyang@aiofm.ac.cn), Zhao Nanjing (njzhao@aiofm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS221436

    Topics