Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 53, Issue 6, 20240084(2024)

Satellite antenna deformation reconstruction technology based on FBG sensors

Jichun ZHAO, Yuanhao LI, Yumiao SONG, Guowen AN, Pinggang JIA, and Jijun XIONG
Author Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Measurement Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(19)
    (a) Satellite dish; (b) Schematic of antenna deformation
    Schematic diagram of the structure of FBG strain sensor. (a) Front view; (b) Back view
    Schematic diagram of FBG temperature sensor structure
    Sensor encapsulation device
    Schematic diagram of wavelength division multiplexing of FBG sensing array
    Distribution map of FBG measurement points
    Normal temperature environment test platform
    Variable temperature environment test platform
    FBG strain sensor calibration curve
    FBG temperature sensor calibration curve
    FBG strain sensor thermal response calibration
    Strain sensor thermal response performance
    Comparison of forward/reverse deformation reconstruction map and actual deformation at 60 ℃
    • Table 1. Strain sensor sensitivity and linearity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Strain sensor sensitivity and linearity

      Strain sensorLoading methodSensitivity/pm·με−1R2
      FBG1Load added0.8380.997
      Load shedding0.8270.996
      FBG2Load added0.8370.999
      Load shedding0.8400.998
      FBG3Load added0.8320.998
      Load shedding0.8410.998
    • Table 2. Temperature sensor sensitivity and linearity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Temperature sensor sensitivity and linearity

      Temperature sensorLoading methodSensitivity/pm·℃−1R2
      FBG1Heating11.360.999
      Cooling11.320.998
      FBG2Heating11.290.998
      Cooling11.330.998
      FBG3Heating11.300.997
      Cooling11.250.996
    • Table 3. FBG strain sensor thermal response sensitivity and linearity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. FBG strain sensor thermal response sensitivity and linearity

      Strain sensorLoading methodSensitivity/pm·℃−1R2
      FBG1Heating35.830.992
      Cooling35.770.995
      FBG2Heating36.220.993
      Cooling36.240.998
      FBG3Heating36.010.991
      Cooling36.190.994
    • Table 4. Reconstruction error of end displacement of four FBG arrays at room temperature

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Reconstruction error of end displacement of four FBG arrays at room temperature

      Weight/kgArray 1Array 2Array 3Array 4
      $ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $
      121.522.353.95%21.722.513.72%21.822.623.76%21.522.333.86%
      242.944.954.77%43.545.494.58%43.645.554.48%43.044.994.63%
      364.768.545.93%65.769.485.75%65.769.535.83%64.868.655.94%
      −121.322.143.96%21.822.573.52%21.822.593.63%21.422.203.74%
      −242.944.934.73%43.645.514.38%43.645.404.12%42.944.934.73%
      −364.668.425.91%65.769.455.71%65.769.355.56%64.868.655.94%
    • Table 5. Reconstruction error of end displacement of four FBG arrays at −30 ℃

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Reconstruction error of end displacement of four FBG arrays at −30 ℃

      Weight/kgArray 1Array 2Array 3Array 4
      $ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $
      121.222.194.67%21.622.604.63%21.222.174.58%21.122.094.69%
      242.545.025.92%43.345.735.61%43.546.005.75%42.745.245.95%
      364.368.786.97%63.567.546.36%65.269.416.46%64.368.756.92%
      −120.321.254.68%20.821.724.42%21.322.244.41%21.122.094.60%
      −242.444.915.92%43.145.525.61%43.145.545.66%42.444.915.92%
      −364.268.676.96%65.269.356.37%65.569.736.46%64.468.866.93
    • Table 6. Reconstruction error of end displacement of four FBG arrays at 60 ℃

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Reconstruction error of end displacement of four FBG arrays at 60 ℃

      Weight/kgArray 1Array 2Array 3Array 4
      $ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $$ {Y}_{r} $$ {Y}_{t} $$ E_i $
      121.922.924.66%22.323.334.62%22.123.104.52%21.021.974.62%
      243.245.755.90%43.846.275.64%44.046.525.73%43.145.665.94%
      364.869.246.85%65.069.136.35%65.069.196.45%64.669.016.82%
      −122.023.024.63%22.223.194.46%22.123.084.42%21.822.824.68%
      −243.245.775.95%43.646.055.62%43.946.395.67%43.145.665.94%
      −364.969.356.86%65.870.006.39%65.769.936.44%64.869.226.82%
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jichun ZHAO, Yuanhao LI, Yumiao SONG, Guowen AN, Pinggang JIA, Jijun XIONG. Satellite antenna deformation reconstruction technology based on FBG sensors[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(6): 20240084

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Optical communication and sensing

    Received: Jan. 10, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jul. 31, 2024

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20240084

    Topics