Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 57, Issue 16, 162801(2020)

Classification of Small-Sized Sample Hyperspectral Images Based on Multi-Scale Residual Network

Xiangdong Zhang*, Tengjun Wang, and Yun Yang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Residual learning block
    Multi-scale spectral feature extraction block
    Multi-scale spatial feature extraction block
    Multi-scale residual network
    Overall accuracy of models with different number of kernels
    Comparison of classification accuracy of inputs with different spatial dimensions. (a) IN; (b) UP
    Classification maps of IN dataset
    Partial enlargement comparison of classification maps of IN dataset
    Classification maps of UP dataset
    Partial enlargement comparison of classification maps of UP dataset
    • Table 1. Sample number distribution of IN dataset

      View table

      Table 1. Sample number distribution of IN dataset

      Sample No.ClassTrainValidationTest
      1Alfalfa5437
      2Corn-notill1421431143
      3Corn-mintill8383664
      4Corn2324190
      5Grass-pasture4848387
      6Grass-trees7373584
      7Grass-pasture-mowed3322
      8Hay-windrow4847383
      9Oats2216
      10Soybean-nottill9797778
      11Soybean-mintill2452461964
      12Soybean-clean5959475
      13Wheat2020165
      14Woods1271261012
      15Building-Grass-Trees3938309
      16Stone-Steel-Towers9975
      Total102310228204
    • Table 2. Sample number distribution of UP dataset

      View table

      Table 2. Sample number distribution of UP dataset

      Sample No.ClassTrainValidationTest
      1Asphalt3313325968
      2Meadows93293316784
      3Gravels1051051889
      4Trees1531532758
      5Painted-Metal-Sheets67671211
      6Bare-Soil2512524526
      7Bitumen66671197
      8Self-Blocking-Bricks1851833314
      9Shadows4847852
      Total2138213938499
    • Table 3. Comparison of classification accuracy of different methods%

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of classification accuracy of different methods%

      MethodINUP
      OAAAKOAAAK
      SVM78.8274.6676.4386.2285.6585.76
      CNN91.4589.8790.3696.6996.2095.98
      Res-3D-CNN95.6391.0292.3597.6597.2496.85
      SSRN97.8494.2896.8299.1799.0999.11
      ResDenNet97.9896.4896.8999.3399.1499.21
      MSRN99.0798.8798.9099.9699.9499.93
    • Table 4. Comparison of training time and test time of different algorithmss

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of training time and test time of different algorithmss

      DatasetTimeCNNRes-3D-CNNSSRNResDenNetMSRN
      INTraining time509.50596.40628.60256.52229.61
      Test time6.426.897.975.427.46
      UPTraining time1321.601256.201034.40203.47192.96
      Test time8.7318.6916.5417.8522.57
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiangdong Zhang, Tengjun Wang, Yun Yang. Classification of Small-Sized Sample Hyperspectral Images Based on Multi-Scale Residual Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(16): 162801

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Nov. 21, 2019

    Accepted: Dec. 31, 2019

    Published Online: Aug. 5, 2020

    The Author Email: Zhang Xiangdong (xiangdong2018@chd.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP57.162801

    Topics