[1] [1] E. Bullmore, O. Sporns. The economy of brain network organization. 10.1038/nrn3214

[2] [2] D.D. Cox, T. Dean. Neural networks and neuroscience-inspired computer vision. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.026

[3] [3] C.E. Leiserson, et al.. There’s plenty of room at the top: what will drive computer performance after Moore’s law?. 10.1126/science.aam9744

[4] [4] M.Z. Alom, et al.. A state-of-the-art survey on deep learning theory and architectures. 10.3390/electronics8030292

[5] [5] Y. LeCun, et al.. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541

[6] [6] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G.E. Hinton. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. 10.1145/3065386

[7] [7] Mahardi, I.-H. Wang, K.-C. Lee, S.-L. Chang. Images classification of dogs and cats using fine-tuned VGG models. 10.1109/ECICE50847.2020.9301918

[8] [8] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

[9] [9] Y. Goldberg. 10.1007/978-3-031-02165-7

[10] [10] B. Hu, Z. Lu, H. Li, Q. Chen. Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. (2015).10.48550/arXiv.1503.03244

[11] [11] G. Hinton, et al.. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: the shared views of four research groups. 10.1109/msp.2012.2205597

[12] [12] T. Wu, et al.. A brief overview of ChatGPT: the history, status quo and potential future development. 10.1109/jas.2023.123618

[14] [14] D. Patterson, et al.. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. (2021).10.48550/arXiv.2104.10350

[15] [15] M. Horowitz. 1.1 Computing's energy problem (and what we can do about it). 10.1109/ISSCC.2014.6757323

[16] [16] Z. Yan, J. Zhou, W.-F. Wong. Energy efficient ECG classification with spiking neural network. 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102170

[17] [17] E. Sadovsky, R. Jarina, R. Orjesek. Image recognition using spiking neural networks. 10.1109/RADIOELEKTRONIKA52220.2021.9420192

[18] [18] F. Martinelli, G. Dellaferrera, P. Mainar, M. Cernak. Spiking neural networks trained with backpropagation for low power neuromorphic implementation of voice activity detection. 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053412

[19] [19] G. Foderaro, C. Henriquez, S. Ferrari. Indirect training of a spiking neural network for flight control via spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. 10.1109/CDC.2010.5717260

[20] [20] V. Vanhoucke, A. Senior, M.Z. Mao. Improving the speed of neural networks on CPUs. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning Workshop (NIPS), (MIT Press (2011), pp. 1-8.

[21] [21] L. Wang, et al.. Superneurons: dynamic GPU memory management for training deep neural networks. 10.1145/3200691.3178491

[22] [22] S. Mittal. A survey of FPGA-based accelerators for convolutional neural networks. 10.1007/s00521-018-3761-1

[23] [23] E. Nurvitadhi, et al.. Accelerating recurrent neural networks in analytics servers: comparison of FPGA, CPU, GPU, and ASIC. 10.1109/FPL.2016.7577314

[24] [24] X. Ju, B. Fang, R. Yan, X. Xu, H. Tang. An FPGA implementation of deep spiking neural networks for low-power and fast classification. 10.1162/neco_a_01245

[25] [25] L.P. Maguire, et al.. Challenges for large-scale implementations of spiking neural networks on FPGAs. 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.11.029

[26] [26] P.A. Merolla, et al.. A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface. 10.1126/science.1254642

[27] [27] B. Govoreanu, et al.. 10×10 nm2 Hf/HfOx crossbar resistive RAM with excellent performance, reliability and low-energy operation. 10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131652

[28] [28] B.J. Choi, et al.. High-speed and low-energy nitride memristors. Adv. Funct. Mater., 26 (2016), pp. 5290-5296.10.1002/adfm.201600680

[29] [29] J. Zhou, et al.. Very low-programming-current RRAM with self-rectifying characteristics. 10.1109/led.2016.2530942

[30] [30] M.-J. Lee, et al.. A fast, high-endurance and scalable non-volatile memory device made from asymmetric Ta2O(5-x)/TaO(2-x) bilayer structures. 10.1038/nmat3070

[31] [31] J.R. Brink, C.R. Haden. The computer and the brain. 10.1109/mahc.1989.10032

[32] [32] W. Jeon, et al.. Chapter Six - Deep Learning with GPUs. 10.1016/bs.adcom.2020.11.003

[33] [33] M. Capra, et al.. Hardware and software optimizations for accelerating deep neural networks: survey of current trends, challenges, and the road ahead. 10.1109/access.2020.3039858

[34] [34] A. Sebastian, M. Le Gallo, R. Khaddam-Aljameh, E. Eleftheriou. Memory devices and applications for in-memory computing. 10.1038/s41565-020-0655-z

[35] [35] J. Ahn, S. Yoo, O. Mutlu, K. Choi. PIM-enabled instructions: a low-overhead, locality-aware processing-in-memory architecture. 10.1145/2872887.2750385

[36] [36] M. Prezioso, et al.. Training and operation of an integrated neuromorphic network based on metal-oxide memristors. 10.1038/nature14441

[37] [37] G.W. Burr, et al.. Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory. 10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585

[38] [38] X. Zhu, W.D. Lu. Optogenetics-inspired tunable synaptic functions in memristors. 10.1021/acsnano.7b07317

[39] [39] O. Krestinskaya, A.P. James, L.O. Chua. Neuromemristive circuits for edge computing: a review. 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2899262

[40] [40] W. Maass. Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models. 10.1016/s0893-6080(97)00011-7

[41] [41] W.S. McCulloch, W. Pitts. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. 10.1007/bf02478259

[42] [42] V. Nair, G.E. Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10),, Omnipress (2010), pp. 807-814.

[43] [43] D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, R.J. Williams. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. 10.1038/323533a0

[44] [44] K. Roy, A. Jaiswal, P. Panda. Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuromorphic computing. 10.1038/s41586-019-1677-2

[45] [45] A. Taherkhani, et al.. A review of learning in biologically plausible spiking neural networks. 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.036

[46] [46] Y. Cao, Y. Chen, D. Khosla. Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition. 10.1007/s11263-014-0788-3

[47] [47] P.U. Diehl, et al.. Fast-classifying, high-accuracy spiking deep networks through weight and threshold balancing. 10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280696

[48] [48] A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764

[49] [49] W. Gerstner, W.M. Kistler. 10.1017/CBO9780511815706

[50] [50] E.M. Izhikevich. Simple model of spiking neurons. 10.1109/tnn.2003.820440

[51] [51] B. Segee. Methods in neuronal modeling: from ions to networks, 2nd Edition. 10.1109/mcise.1999.743629

[52] [52] W. Fang, et al.. Incorporating learnable membrane time constant to enhance learning of spiking neural networks. 10.1109/Iccv48922.2021.00266

[53] [53] Q. Duan, et al.. Spiking neurons with spatiotemporal dynamics and gain modulation for monolithically integrated memristive neural networks. 10.1038/s41467-020-17215-3

[54] [54] R. Yang, H.-M. Huang, X. Guo. Memristive synapses and neurons for bioinspired computing. 10.1002/aelm.201900287

[55] [55] M. Xu, et al.. Recent advances on neuromorphic devices based on chalcogenide phase-change materials. 10.1002/adfm.202003419

[56] [56] J.-N. Huang, T. Wang, H.-M. Huang, X. Guo. Adaptive SRM neuron based on NbO memristive device for neuromorphic computing. 10.1016/j.chip.2022.100015

[57] [57] A. Shaban, S.S. Bezugam, M. Suri. An adaptive threshold neuron for recurrent spiking neural networks with nanodevice hardware implementation. 10.1038/s41467-021-24427-8

[58] [58] S. Hochreiter, J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

[59] [59] J. Tang, et al.. Bridging biological and artificial neural networks with emerging neuromorphic devices: fundamentals, progress, and challenges. 10.1002/adma.201902761

[60] [60] T. Masquelier, R. Guyonneau, S.J. Thorpe. Competitive STDP-based spike pattern learning. 10.1162/neco.2008.06-08-804

[61] [61] S.R. Kheradpisheh, M. Ganjtabesh, S.J. Thorpe, T. Masquelier. TDP-based spiking deep convolutional neural networks for object recognition. 10.1016/j.neunet.2017.12.005

[62] [62] M. Mozafari, S.R. Kheradpisheh, T. Masquelier, A. Nowzari-Dalini, M. Ganjtabesh. First-spike-based visual categorization using reward-modulated STDP. 10.1109/tnnls.2018.2826721

[63] [63] M. Mozafari, M. Ganjtabesh, A. Nowzari-Dalini, S.J. Thorpe, T. Masquelier. Bio-inspired digit recognition using reward-modulated spike-timing-dependent plasticity in deep convolutional networks. 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.05.015

[64] [64] P.U. Diehl, M. Cook. Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity. 10.3389/fncom.2015.00099

[65] [65] A. Tavanaei, A. Maida. BP-STDP: approximating backpropagation using spike timing dependent plasticity. 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.11.014

[66] [66] H. Zheng, Y. Wu, L. Deng, Y. Hu, G. Li. Going deeper with directly-trained larger spiking neural networks. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 11062–11070 (AAAI, 2021), IEEE (2021), pp. 230-233.10.1609/aaai.v35i12.17320

[67] [67] Y. Wu, et al.. Direct training for spiking neural networks: faster, larger, better. 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011311

[68] [68] P. Gu, R. Xiao, G. Pan, H. Tang. STCA: spatio-temporal credit assignment with delayed feedback in deep spiking neural networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19),, Morgan Kaufmann (2019), pp. 1366-1372.

[69] [69] Y. Yan, et al.. Graph-based spatio-temporal backpropagation for training spiking neural networks. 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS), IEEE (2021), pp. 1-4.10.1109/AICAS51828.2021.9458461

[70] [70] L. Liang, et al.. H2Learn: high-efficiency learning accelerator for high-accuracy spiking neural networks. 10.1109/tcad.2021.3138347

[71] [71] J. Han, Z. Wang, J. Shen, H. Tang. Symmetric-threshold ReLU for fast and nearly lossless ANN-SNN conversion. 10.1007/s11633-022-1388-2

[72] [72] J. Ding, Z. Yu, Y. Tian, T. Huang. Optimal ANN-SNN conversion for fast and accurate inference in deep spiking neural networks. Preprint at. 10.48550/arXiv.2105.11654

[73] [73] W. Fang, et al.. SpikingJelly: an open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence. 10.1126/sciadv.adi1480

[74] [74] J.K. Eshraghian, et al.. Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning. 10.1109/jproc.2023.3308088

[75] [75] M. Stimberg, R. Brette, D.F. Goodman. Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator. 10.7554/eLife.47314

[76] [76] D.B. Strukov, G.S. Snider, D.R. Stewart, R.S. Williams. The missing memristor found. 10.1038/nature06932

[77] [77] Y.-T. Su, et al.. A method to reduce forming voltage without degrading device performance in hafnium oxide-based 1T1R resistive random access memory. 10.1109/jeds.2018.2805285

[78] [78] S.-X. Chen, S.-P. Chang, S.-J. Chang, W.-K. Hsieh, C.-H. Lin. Highly stable ultrathin TiO2 based resistive random access memory with low operation voltage. 10.1149/2.0281807jss

[79] [79] A. Prakash, D. Deleruyelle, J. Song, M. Bocquet, H. Hwang. Resistance controllability and variability improvement in a TaOx-based resistive memory for multilevel storage application. 10.1063/1.4922446

[80] [80] F.M. Simanjuntak, D. Panda, K.-H. Wei, T.-Y. Tseng. Status and prospects of ZnO-based resistive switching memory devices. 10.1186/s11671-016-1570-y

[81] [81] W. Banerjee, et al.. Occurrence of resistive switching and threshold switching in atomic layer deposited ultrathin (2 nm) aluminium oxide crossbar resistive random access memory. 10.1109/led.2015.2407361

[82] [82] Y. Li, et al.. Ultrafast synaptic events in a chalcogenide memristor. 10.1038/srep01619

[83] [83] Y. Li, et al.. Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity of a chalcogenide electronic synapse for neuromorphic systems. 10.1038/srep04906

[84] [84] X. Xia, et al.. 2D-Material-Based volatile and nonvolatile memristive devices for neuromorphic computing. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c01026

[85] [85] G. Cao, et al.. 2D material based synaptic devices for neuromorphic computing. 10.1002/adfm.202005443

[86] [86] Y. van de Burgt, A. Melianas, S.T. Keene, G. Malliaras, A. Salleo. Organic electronics for neuromorphic computing. 10.1038/s41928-018-0103-3

[87] [87] L. Yuan, S. Liu, W. Chen, F. Fan, G. Liu. Organic memory and memristors: from mechanisms, materials to devices. 10.1002/aelm.202100432

[88] [88] R. Waser, R. Dittmann, G. Staikov, K. Szot. Redox-based resistive switching memories – nanoionic mechanisms, prospects, and challenges. 10.1002/adma.200900375

[89] [89] F. Zahoor, T.Z. Azni Zulkifli, F.A. Khanday. Resistive random access memory (RRAM): an overview of materials, switching mechanism, performance, multilevel cell (mlc) storage, modeling, and applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett., 15 (2020), p. 90.10.1186/s11671-020-03299-9

[90] [90] M.A. Zidan, J.P. Strachan, W.D. Lu. The future of electronics based on memristive systems. 10.1038/s41928-017-0006-8

[91] [91] R. Schmitt, et al.. Accelerated ionic motion in amorphous memristor oxides for nonvolatile memories and neuromorphic computing. 10.1002/adfm.201804782

[92] [92] D.-H. Kwon, et al.. Atomic structure of conducting nanofilaments in TiO2 resistive switching memory. 10.1038/nnano.2009.456

[93] [93] I. Valov, R. Waser, J.R. Jameson, M.N. Kozicki. Electrochemical metallization memories—fundamentals, applications, prospects. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254003

[94] [94] F. Qin, Y. Zhang, H.W. Song, S. Lee. Enhancing memristor fundamentals through instrumental characterization and understanding reliability issues. 10.1039/d3ma00069a

[95] [95] I. Chakraborty, A. Jaiswal, A.K. Saha, S.K. Gupta, K. Roy. Pathways to efficient neuromorphic computing with non-volatile memory technologies. 10.1063/1.5113536

[96] [96] A.R. Patil, T.D. Dongale, R.K. Kamat, K.Y. Rajpure. Binary metal oxide-based resistive switching memory devices: a status review. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105356

[97] [97] Z. Wang, et al.. Engineering incremental resistive switching in TaOx based memristors for brain-inspired computing. 10.1039/c6nr00476h

[98] [98] L. Wu, H. Liu, J. Li, S. Wang, X. Wang. A multi-level memristor based on Al-doped HfO2 thin film. 10.1186/s11671-019-3015-x

[99] [99] W.S. Choi, et al.. Influence of Al2O3 layer on InGaZnO memristor crossbar array for neuromorphic applications. 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111813

[100] [100] Y. Xiao, et al.. Improved artificial synapse performance of Pt/HfO2/BiFeO3/HfO2/TiN memristor through N2 annealing. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.045

[101] [101] Y.-L. Zhu, et al.. Uniform and robust TiN/HfO2/Pt memristor through interfacial Al-doping engineering. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149274

[102] [102] C. Li, et al.. Large memristor crossbars for analog computing. 10.1109/ISCAS.2018.8351877

[103] [103] C. Li, et al.. Analogue signal and image processing with large memristor crossbars. 10.1038/s41928-017-0002-z

[104] [104] M. Hu, et al.. Memristor-based analog computation and neural network classification with a dot product engine. 10.1002/adma.201705914

[105] [105] C. Li, et al.. Efficient and self-adaptive in-situ learning in multilayer memristor neural networks. 10.1038/s41467-018-04484-2

[106] [106] Q. Liu, et al.. 33.2 A fully integrated analog ReRAM based 78.4 TOPS/W compute-in-memory chip with fully parallel MAC computing. 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), 500–502 (IEEE, 2020), IEEE (2020), pp. 500-502.10.1109/ISSCC19947.2020.9062953

[107] [107] P. Yao, et al.. Fully hardware-implemented memristor convolutional neural network. 10.1038/s41586-020-1942-4

[108] [108] K. Jeon, et al.. Purely self-rectifying memristor-based passive crossbar array for artificial neural network accelerators. 10.1038/s41467-023-44620-1

[109] [109] S. Ambrogio, et al.. Equivalent-accuracy accelerated neural-network training using analogue memory. 10.1038/s41586-018-0180-5

[110] [110] F.M. Bayat, et al.. Implementation of multilayer perceptron network with highly uniform passive memristive crossbar circuits. 10.1038/s41467-018-04482-4

[111] [111] R. Wang, et al.. Implementing in-situ self-organizing maps with memristor crossbar arrays for data mining and optimization. 10.1038/s41467-022-29411-4

[112] [112] H. Zhao, et al.. Energy-efficient high-fidelity image reconstruction with memristor arrays for medical diagnosis. 10.1038/s41467-023-38021-7

[113] [113] F. Ye, F. Kiani, Y. Huang, Q. Xia. Diffusive memristors with uniform and tunable relaxation time for spike generation in event-based pattern recognition. 10.1002/adma.202204778

[114] [114] S. Kumar, R.S. Williams, Z. Wang. Third-order nanocircuit elements for neuromorphic engineering. 10.1038/s41586-020-2735-5

[115] [115] Z. Wang, et al.. Fully memristive neural networks for pattern classification with unsupervised learning. 10.1038/s41928-018-0023-2

[116] [116] Z. Wu, et al.. A habituation sensory nervous system with memristors. 10.1002/adma.202004398

[117] [117] R. Yuan, et al.. A neuromorphic physiological signal processing system based on VO2 memristor for next-generation human-machine interface. 10.1038/s41467-023-39430-4

[118] [118] H. Wang, Y. Xu, R. Yang, X. Miao. A LIF neuron with adaptive firing frequency based on the GaSe memristor. 10.1109/ted.2023.3288508

[119] [119] J. Zhao, et al.. Memristors based on NdNiO3 nanocrystals film as sensory neurons for neuromorphic computing. 10.1039/d3mh00835e

[120] [120] M. Song, et al.. Self-compliant threshold switching devices with high on/off ratio by control of quantized conductance in Ag filaments. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00327

[121] [121] Q. Hua, H. Wu, B. Gao, H. Qian. Enhanced performance of Ag-filament threshold switching selector by rapid thermal processing. 10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2018.8403855

[122] [122] S. Agarwal, et al.. Resistive memory device requirements for a neural algorithm accelerator. 10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727298

[123] [123] T. Kim, et al.. Spiking neural network (SNN) with memristor synapses having non-linear weight update. 10.3389/fncom.2021.646125

[124] [124] M. Rao, et al.. Thousands of conductance levels in memristors integrated on CMOS. 10.1038/s41586-023-05759-5

[125] [125] N. Rathi, P. Panda, K. Roy. STDP-based pruning of connections and weight quantization in spiking neural networks for energy-efficient recognition. 10.1109/tcad.2018.2819366

[126] [126] W.C. Shen, et al.. High-K metal gate contact RRAM (CRRAM) in pure 28 nm CMOS logic process. 10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479146

[127] [127] R. Zhao, et al.. Accelerating binarized convolutional neural networks with software-programmable FPGAs. 2017 International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA), ACM (2017), pp. 15-24.10.1145/3020078.3021741

[128] [128] I. Hubara, M. Courbariaux, D. Soudry, R. El-Yaniv, Y. Bengio. Binarized neural networks. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), MIP Press (2016), pp. 4114-4122.

[129] [129] E. Nurvitadhi, et al.. Accelerating binarized neural networks: comparison of FPGA, CPU, GPU, and ASIC. In 2016 International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology (FPT), 77–84. 10.1109/FPT.2016.7929192

[130] [130] S. Liang, S. Yin, L. Liu, W. Luk, S. Wei. FP-BNN: binarized neural network on FPGA. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.046

[131] [131] X. Sun, et al.. XNOR-RRAM: a scalable and parallel resistive synaptic architecture for binary neural networks. 10.23919/DATE.2018.8342235

[132] [132] T. Simons, D.-J. Lee. A review of binarized neural networks. 10.3390/electronics8060661

[133] [133] G.C. Qiao, et al.. Direct training of hardware-friendly weight binarized spiking neural network with surrogate gradient learning towards spatio-temporal event-based dynamic data recognition. 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.06.070

[134] [134] V.-T. Nguyen, Q.-K. T, R. Zhang, Y. Nakashima. XNOR-BSNN: in-memory computing model for deep binarized spiking neural network. 2021 International Conference on High Performance Big Data and Intelligent Systems (HPBD&IS), 17–21 (IEEE, 2021), IEEE (2021), pp. 17-21.10.1109/HPBDIS53214.2021.9658467

[135] [135] M. Abu Lebdeh, H. Abunahla, B. Mohammad, M. Al-Qutayri. An efficient heterogeneous memristive xnor for in-memory computing. 10.1109/tcsi.2017.2706299

[136] [136] X.-Y. Wang, et al.. High-density memristor-CMOS ternary logic family. 10.1109/tcsi.2020.3027693

[137] [137] W. Zhang, et al.. Edge learning using a fully integrated neuro-inspired memristor chip. 10.1126/science.ade3483

[138] [138] A. Balaji, et al.. Mapping spiking neural networks to neuromorphic hardware. 10.1109/tvlsi.2019.2951493

[139] [139] A. Ankit, A. Sengupta, P. Panda, K. Roy. RESPARC: a reconfigurable and energy-efficient architecture with memristive crossbars for deep spiking neural networks. 2017 Design Automation Conference (DAC), 1–6 (ACM, 2017), ACM (2017), pp. 1-6.10.1145/3061639.3062311

[140] [140] G. Boquet, et al.. Offline training for memristor-based neural networks. 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 1547–1551 (IEEE, 2021), , 1547-1551 (IEEE, 2021). (2021), pp. 1547-1551.10.23919/Eusipco47968.2020.9287574

[141] [141] P. Wijesinghe, A. Ankit, A. Sengupta, K. Roy. An all-memristor deep spiking neural computing system: a step toward realizing the low-power stochastic brain. 10.1109/tetci.2018.2829924

[142] [142] W. Maass. Lower bounds for the computational power of networks of spiking neurons. 10.1162/neco.1996.8.1.1

[143] [143] M. Beyeler, N.D. Dutt, J.L. Krichmar. Categorization and decision-making in a neurobiologically plausible spiking network using a STDP-like learning rule. 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.07.012

[144] [144] A. Tavanaei, T. Masquelier, A.S. Maida. Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity. 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 307–314 (IEEE, 2016), IEEE (2016), pp. 307-314.10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727213

[145] [145] A. Tavanaei, M. Ghodrati, S.R. Kheradpisheh, T. Masquelier, A. Maida. Deep learning in spiking neural networks. 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.12.002

[146] [146] L. Deng, et al.. Rethinking the performance comparison between SNNS and ANNS. 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.005

[147] [147] G. Gallego, et al.. Event-based vision: a survey. 10.1109/tpami.2020.3008413

[148] [148] M. Abadi, et al.. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. Preprint at. 10.48550/arXiv.1603.04467

[149] [149] A. Paszke, et al.. Automatic Differentiation in PyTorch. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 1–4 (MIT Press, 2017), MIT Press (2017).

[150] [150] M. Sivan, et al.. All WSe2 1T1R resistive RAM cell for future monolithic 3D embedded memory integration. 10.1038/s41467-019-13176-4

[151] [151] E.J. Merced-Grafals, N. Dávila, N. Ge, R.S. Williams, J.P. Strachan. Repeatable, accurate, and high speed multi-level programming of memristor 1T1R arrays for power efficient analog computing applications. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/36/365202

[152] [152] J. Song, J. Woo, A. Prakash, D. Lee, H. Hwang. Threshold selector with high selectivity and steep slope for cross-point memory array. 10.1109/led.2015.2430332

[153] [153] Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, H. Li, L. Shi. Realizing bidirectional threshold switching in Ag/Ta2O5/Pt diffusive devices for selector applications. 10.1007/s11664-018-6730-7

[154] [154] K.M. Kim, et al.. self-rectifying, and forming-free memristor with an asymmetric programing voltage for a high-density crossbar application. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01781

[155] [155] J.J. Yang, D.B. Strukov, D.R. Stewart. Memristive devices for computing. 10.1038/nnano.2012.240

[156] [156] A. Grossi, et al.. Fundamental variability limits of filament-based RRAM. 10.1109/IEDM.2016.7838348

[157] [157] A. Chen. Utilizing the variability of resistive random access memory to implement reconfigurable physical unclonable functions. 10.1109/led.2014.2385870

[158] [158] F. Pan, S. Gao, C. Chen, C. Song, F. Zeng. Recent progress in resistive random access memories: materials, switching mechanisms, and performance. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.06.002