Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 56, Issue 22, 223005(2019)

Examination of Plastic Pack Belts (Ropes) via X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Combined with Multivariate Statistical Analysis

Xiao Ma1, Hong Jiang1,2、*, and Jiaqi Yang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Forensic Science, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Evidence Science(China University of Political Science and Law), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100088, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(8)
    Cluster analysis results of 32 plastic pack belt (rope) samples
    Joint distribution map based on discriminant function
    • Table 1. Optimal results of measurement time

      View table

      Table 1. Optimal results of measurement time

      Duration /sMass fraction of element /10-6
      CaFeSnZnHgCl
      50624723228629140
      60606533955958130
      70772744127946140
      80776384227646140
      9063311331773690
      100724403846044110
    • Table 2. Calculation results of relative standard deviation

      View table

      Table 2. Calculation results of relative standard deviation

      MeasurementNo.Mass fraction /%
      CaFeSnZnCl
      1625352365581532
      2620653055551297
      3636854356541455
      4680257863571506
      Averagevalue6407.25543.559.75561447.5
      Standarddeviation271.822724.44724.99171.8257105.3075
      Relativestandarddeviation /%4.244.508.353.267.28
    • Table 3. Correlation analysis results of six plastic pack belt (rope) samples

      View table

      Table 3. Correlation analysis results of six plastic pack belt (rope) samples

      Sample No.Parameter5#7#10#15#20#28#
      5#Pearson coefficient1
      Sig. (2-tailed)
      7#Pearson coefficient0.985**1
      Sig. (2-tailed)0
      10#Pearson coefficient0.892**0.878**1
      Sig. (2-tailed)00
      15#Pearson coefficient0.737**0.683*0.813**1
      Sig. (2-tailed)0.0100.0200.002
      20#Pearson coefficient0.884**0.862**0.992**0.881**1
      Sig. (2-tailed)00.00100
      28#Pearson coefficient0.891**0.872**0.998**0.851**0.998**1
      Sig. (2-tailed)0000.0010
      Note: **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed), and *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
    • Table 4. Eigenvalue table of discriminant function

      View table

      Table 4. Eigenvalue table of discriminant function

      FunctionNo.EigenvalueVariance/%Cumulation/%Canonicalcorrelation
      173.171a96.396.30.993
      22.263 a3.099.30.833
      30.544 a0.7100.00.059
      Note: a represents the first 3 canonical discriminant functions were used in the analysis.
    • Table 5. Structural matrix of discriminant function

      View table

      Table 5. Structural matrix of discriminant function

      ElementFunction 1Function 2Function 3
      Ca-0.797*-0.099-0.148
      Fe-0.092*0.054-0.089
      Cl-0.0340.359*-0.121
      Zn-0.092-0.195*-0.051
      Ti-0.038-0.240.422*
      Ba0.002-0.002-0.106*
      Sn0.039-0.004-0.052*
    • Table 6. Hierarchical clustering results of 32 plastic pack belt (rope) samples

      View table

      Table 6. Hierarchical clustering results of 32 plastic pack belt (rope) samples

      ClassificationSample No.
      1#,2#,5#,7#,8#,9#,13#,14#,17#,18#,19#,22#,24#,26#,27#,29#,31#,32#
      4#、6#、12#、15#、21#、30#
      3#、16#
      10#,11#,20#,23#,25#,28#
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiao Ma, Hong Jiang, Jiaqi Yang. Examination of Plastic Pack Belts (Ropes) via X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Combined with Multivariate Statistical Analysis[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(22): 223005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Spectroscopy

    Received: Apr. 29, 2019

    Accepted: May. 28, 2019

    Published Online: Nov. 2, 2019

    The Author Email: Jiang Hong (jiangh2001@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP56.223005

    Topics