Acta Physica Sinica, Volume. 69, Issue 1, 017801-1(2020)
Fig. 1. The schematic model and the reflectivity of bulk ferrite under different magnetized methods, magnetic field intensities and polarized directions: (a) The schematic model; (b) the influence of different magnetic field intensities under longitudinal magnetization; (c) different polarized directions under transversal magnetization; (d) the influence of different magnetized methods.
Fig. 2. The unit cell and the reflectivity of transversally orthogonally magnetized ferrite: (a) The unit cell(A and B present the ferrite magnetized along
Fig. 3. Reflection of ferrites array with different element sizes in different magnetized conditions: (a) The discrete array; the influence of
in (b) longitudinal magnetization; (c) transversal magnetization with TE polarization and (d) transverse magnetization with TM polarization.
Fig. 4. The schematic and the properties of elements combinations with different sizes: (a) Schematic of the array combined by different elements(The left shows the details of supercell1(2)); the combination of
and
under longitudinal magnetization (b) 200 Oe and (c) 700 Oe; (d) the combination of
and
under longitudinal magnetization 700 Oe; the combination of
and
under transversal magnetization (e) 200 Oe and (f) 700 Oe; (g) the combination of
and
under transversal magnetization 700 Oe.
Fig. 5. Distributions of electric field, magnetic field and power loss density in the and
at two absorption peaks: (a) 1.95 GHz and (b) 3.05 GHz of longitudinal magnetization 700 Oe; (c) 1.65 GHz and (d) 2.25 GHz of transversal magnetization 700 Oe.
Fig. 6. Distributions of power loss density in the
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Kang-Ping Ye, Wen-Jin Pei, Xiang Xi, Yin Pu, Rui-Xin Wu.
Category:
Received: Aug. 14, 2019
Accepted: --
Published Online: Nov. 4, 2020
The Author Email: