In the dynamic landscape of semiconductor research,germanium has captured global attention as a promising alternative to silicon in the past two decades[
Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, Volume. 43, Issue 6, 749(2024)
Ion implantation process and lattice damage mechanism of boron doped crystalline germanium
The response wavelength of the blocked-impurity-band (BIB) structured infrared detector can reach 200 μm, which is the most important very long wavelength infrared astronomical detector. The ion implantation method greatly simplifies the fabrication process of the device, but it is easy to cause lattice damage, introduce crystalline defects, and lead to the increase of the dark current of detectors. Herein, the boron-doped germanium ion implantation process was studied, and the involved lattice damage mechanism was discussed. Experimental conditions involved using 80 keV energy for boron ion implantation, with doses ranging from 1
Introduction
In the dynamic landscape of semiconductor research,germanium has captured global attention as a promising alternative to silicon in the past two decades[
Contrary to silicon,there is a scarcity of comprehensive studies on lattice damage in germanium resulting from ion implantation using boron as a dopant. Until now,very few reports have been available on the study of lattice damage in germanium by boron implantation. Suresh et al.(2001)provided noticeable insights into the diffusion behavior of boron in germanium after implantation by employing secondary ion mass spectroscopy(SIMS)[
1 Experiments
The process involved implanting Boron ions into undoped germanium wafers with a <100> orientation at room temperature. The boron ions,carrying an energy of 80 keV,were implanted at six different doses ranging from 1×1013 to 3×1015cm-2. The incident beam was inclined at an angle of 7 degrees off the surface normal. After the initial implantation of samples,X-ray diffraction(XRD)and Raman spectroscopy were employed on as implanted samples to analyze the structural alterations and lattice damage.
Furthermore,the samples underwent annealing at 450 degrees and subsequently examined through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS)and SIMS in conjunction with the previously employed XRD and Raman spectroscopy techniques for a better understanding of chemical and structural changes that happened after annealing. The results revealed that the defects induced by the implantation process were predominantly eliminated after the thermal treatment except the strain residual which still exists at high doses showcasing the irreversible damage caused by ion implantation at higher doses.
2 Results and discussions
2.1 XRD analysis
To explore and confirm the alterations in the crystal lattice resulting from boron ion implantation in germanium Ge,X-ray diffraction(XRD)was conducted along the(100)crystallographic direction. The objective was to systematically examine the diffraction patterns across a series of samples,encompassing a spectrum of boron doses ranging from 1×1013 to 3×1015 cm-2. Samples were examined after implantation and annealing,to study the comprehensive impact of ion implantation on the germanium crystal lattice.
Figure 1.XRD spectra of B implanted Ge:(a)as implanted;(b)after annealing at 450oC
However,post-annealing has mitigated some distortions in all spectra yet the widest peaks persist for the highest boron dose,even after annealing that occurs at 450 °C for 60 s.
2.2 Raman spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy was implied on the implanted germanium to further analyze the structural properties of boron implanted germanium. In
Figure 2.Raman spectra of B implanted Ge samples at different doses:(a)as implanted;(b)annealed at 450 oC
However,a significant deviation was observed at the highest dose of 3×1015 cm-2 where a major Raman shift of 132 cm-1 was observed,as shown in the
Figure 3.Spectra of germanium sample implanted at 3×
2.3 XPS analysis
To explore the influence of implantation on elemental and chemical alterations at the sample's surface after annealing,X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS)was performed on all annealed samples.
Figure 4.XPS spectra illustrating boron implantation into germanium across distinct doses:(a)Ge3d scan;(b)C1s scan
Slight differences in peak shifts across the six samples were observed,this point towards potential structural changes induced by boron incorporation. Particularly,a distinctive feature emerged with a significant decrease in peak intensity for samples exposed to doses of 3×1015 and 5×1014 cm-2. This reduction in intensity even after annealing suggests presence of strain produced into the lattice structure by boron incorporation. This result is consistent with the results of XRD and Raman analysis.
Figure 5.XPS B1s spectra illustrating boron implantation into germanium across six distinct doses
2.4 SIMS depth profiling
In order to further clarify the results obtained from XRD,Raman spectroscopy,and XPS analyses,secondary ion mass spectrometry(SIMS)was employed specifically on samples subjected to two higher doses. This additional SIMS analysis aimed to provide comprehensive insights into the elemental distribution,composition,and depth profiling,enhancing our understanding of the structural and chemical modifications induced by the implantation of elevated doses which are 5×1014cm-2 and 3×1015cm-2.
Figure 6.SIMS analysis of B implanted Ge for two high doses:(a)
|
Notably,the projected depth Rp,as revealed by the SIMS depth profile for both doses,measures approximately 0.239 μm. This uniformity in depth signifies a robust control over the implantation process,emphasizing its reproducibility. Additionally,a slight channeling tail has been observed for both doses. The observed channeling tail in this analysis aligns with the close link between the channeling effect and lattice damage in ion implantation. Channeling concentrates ion flux and induces localized strain and defects. This interplay is vital for understanding the ion penetration and distribution within the crystalline lattice,germanium's high stopping power further amplifies these effects. This observation is in agreement with the findings of a previous study conducted by R. Wittmann who studied depth profiles for boron implanted germanium for the energy range from 5 to 40 keV[
3 Conclusions
Boron ion implantation effects on the lattice structure of pure germanium crystals were investigated using 80 keV energy and fluencies spanning from 1×1013 to 3×1015cm-2. This study employed a multi-technique approach,integrating X-ray diffraction(XRD),Raman spectroscopy,X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS),and secondary ion mass spectrometry(SIMS)to comprehensively analyze the structural and chemical alterations induced by boron ion implantation at these specified doses. In all cases,minimal distortions were observed at lower doses of boron ion implantation,which went away after annealing at 450 °C for 60 s,as evidenced by the comprehensive analysis by XRD and Raman spectroscopy. However,for higher doses,the study identified presence of potential residual lattice distortion,emphasizing the challenges of mitigating irreversible distortions during implantation. Residual strain due to lattice damage at high doses was confirmed from XPS and SIMS analysis. In conclusion,this research contributes valuable insights into the lattice damage induced by boron ion implantation in germanium,emphasizing the importance of understanding and mitigating these effects for the development of high-performance semiconductor devices.
[1] R R Moskalyk. Review of germanium processing worldwide. Minerals engineering, 17, 393-402(2004).
[12] Chang-Yi PAN, Hao MOU, Xiao-Mei YAO et al. High performance Ge:B blocked impurity band detector developed using near-surface processing techniques. J. Infrared MillimWaves.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Um E HABIBA, Tian-Ye CHEN, Chi-Xian LIU, Wei DOU, Xiao-Yan LIU, Jing-Wei LING, Chang-Yi PAN, Peng WANG, Hui-Yong DENG, Hong SHEN, Ning DAI. Ion implantation process and lattice damage mechanism of boron doped crystalline germanium[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2024, 43(6): 749
Category: Infrared Physics, Materials and Devices
Received: Feb. 1, 2024
Accepted: --
Published Online: Dec. 13, 2024
The Author Email: DENG Hui-Yong (hydeng@mail.sitp.ac.cn), SHEN Hong (hongshen@mail.sitp.ac.cn), DAI Ning (ndai@mail.sitp.ac.cn)