Opto-Electronic Advances, Volume. 4, Issue 11, 210048-1(2021)

Flexible SERS substrates for hazardous materials detection: recent advances

Moram Sree Satya Bharati and Venugopal Rao Soma*
Author Affiliations
  • Advanced Centre of Research in High Energy Materials (ACRHEM), University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India
  • show less

    This article reviews the most recent advances in the development of flexible substrates used as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) platforms for detecting several hazardous materials (e.g., explosives, pesticides, drugs, and dyes). Different flexible platforms such as papers/filter papers, fabrics, polymer nanofibers, and cellulose fibers have been investigated over the last few years and their SERS efficacies have been evaluated. We start with an introduction of the importance of hazardous materials trace detection followed by a summary of different SERS methodologies with particular attention on flexible substrates and their advantages over the nanostructures and nanoparticle-based solid/hybrid substrates. The potential of flexible SERS substrates, in conjunction with a simple portable Raman spectrometer, is the power to enable practical/on-field/point of interest applications primarily because of their low-cost and easy sampling.


    In the present-day scenario, human health, and environmental safety are the foremost concerns worldwide. Hazardous materials are referred to as those which have been determined to be capable of presenting an unreasonable risk to human health, safety, and property. The main characteristics of these materials are ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity. The specific categories among these materials are explosives, flammable liquids, gases, oxidizers, corrosives, flammable solids, radioactive materials, poisonous/infectious substances, and dangerous substances. We start with a short overview of various hazardous materials followed by the introduction of Raman spectroscopy and surface enhanced Rama spectroscopy/scattering (SERS) techniques. This review aims to report on the detection of hazardous materials such as explosives, pesticides, and simulants of chemical warfare agents using flexible SERS substrates.

    Hazardous materials

    Explosives/high energy materials (HEMs) are those materials that contain nitro groups (which are energetic) and release an enormous amount of energy in the form of light and heat when they are subjected to an external stimulus such as (a) spark (b) shock or even (c) friction. Explosives are commonly categorized as primary and secondary depending on their detonation (velocity, pressure etc.) and sensitivity parameters. Primary explosives are extremely sensitive and release enormous energy even with a small perturbation such as shock/collision. Therefore, the difficulty is generally high while handling the primary explosives. They act as boosters or initiators for detonating secondary explosives. Lead azide and mercury fulminate are a few examples of primary explosives, while 1,3,5,7-Tetranitro-1,3,5,7- tetrazocane (HMX), 1,3,5-Trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), trinitrotoluene (TNT), etc. are representative of secondary explosives secondary explosives secondary explosives seconda. Interestingly, there are few home-prepared explosives utilized in the preparation of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). These are now easily synthesized at the laboratory level from simple molecules such as ammonium nitrate (AN), dinitrotoluene (DNT), picric acid (PA), etc.. Pesticides are the chemicals used by farmers/transporters to protect the crops/vegetables/fruits from insects/pests/rodents. The overused pesticides will remain as residues in the food, which may cause risk to human health (cancer/allergies/intoxications) and the ecosystem (surface water/soil)2. Malathion, Carbofuran, methyl parathion, Carbaryl, etc., are a few examples of various pesticides available in the market. For example, thiram is the most used pesticide, which averts fungal diseases, but it causes damage to the skin and is very harmful to the health. Chemical warfare agents (CWAs)3, 4 are the chemical weapons used in a terrorist attacks, which are an intensified threat to the environment and civilian population. The principal compounds are mustard, lewisite, G-series nerve agents [Tabun (GA); Sarin (GB); Soman (GD)], and V-series nerve agents [O-ethyl S-(2-diisopropylaminoethyl) methylphosphonothioate (VX)]. Sarin was used as a chemical weapon by terrorists in the 1995 exposure incident in the Tokyo subway system wherein more than 1000 people were affected. At room temperature, these are volatile liquids that cause a serious risk (paralysis, loss of consciousness, depression of the central respiratory drive) from exposure (dermal contact with a liquid nerve agent). Inhalation of the low vapor nerve agent even for a few minutes (for e.g., ~10 min) causes the contraction of the pupils of the eye, tightness of the chest, headache, rhinorrhea, etc3. These are extremely toxic, and their usage is restricted in non-surety laboratories because of the risk in exposure assessments. Chemical warfare agent simulants are recently developed, and they mimic the actual CWAs carrying all the relevant chemical and physical properties without accompanying their toxicological properties. Vinod Kumar et al5. reported the development of CWAs, their toxicity, and first usage as weapons worldwide. He discussed the different principles and chemical sensing methods of CWAs and developments in chromo-fluorogenic sensing techniques. Most of the CWA simulants are odorless, colorless, and tasteless. Distilled mustard (HD- C4H8Cl2S), methyl salicylate (MS- C8H8O3), 2-Chloroethyl methyl sulphide (CEMS- C3H7ClS), etc. are the surrogate simulants of mustard CWA. Dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP), di-ethyl methylphosphonate (DEMP), di-ethyl ethylphosphonate (DEEP), Diisopropyl methylphosphonate (DIMP), etc. are the simulants of G-Agent. [G-Agent named because these are first secretly synthesized by the German Ministry of Defense before and during World War II-1936] Amiton (VG), S-diethyl phenylphosphonothioate (DEPP), Malathion, parathion, etc. are simulants of VX agent.

    Therefore, rapid and reliable detection of these hazardous molecules is the primary concern of both governmental agencies and research community to reduce the risk to society. Razdan and co-workers6 have recently provided a comprehensive review on the laser based standoff detection of CWA. In this review, they clearly tabulated the classification, toxicity (lethal dose), and other important properties of the CWA. The significant global research progress in the laser-based sensors such as Raman sensors and DIAL [differential absorption LIDAR (light detection and ranging)] sensors in the detection of CWA. There exists a variety of analytical methods (reported in the literature) for the detection of such hazardous materials either in residue/bulk form or in concealed places. Some of the tested and mature techniques include ion-mobility spectroscopy (IMS), terahertz (THz) spectroscopy, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), Raman spectroscopy and variants, photo-acoustic, and gas chromatography, etc7-14. Some of these techniques either cause partial sample destruction or require isolation of sample, which is very difficult in the case of traces. Additionally, a few of these techniques do not favor the usage of low quantity samples and require a skilled person for instrument calibration and measurements. Furthermore, high water absorption, poor specificity, and difficulty in instrumentation limit the usage of these techniques for on-field explosive detection15, 16.

    Raman spectroscopy and variants

    Raman spectroscopy is a simple, rapid, and a non-destructive spectroscopic technique based on molecular vibrations as signatures in the spectra. The Raman spectrum of any analyte molecule provides specific information and conveys chemical/structural information. This is important in the case of explosives (in pure form or even in the mixture form) irrespective of solid, liquid, powder, or gas state17-22. However, Raman scattering is a very weak process and, consequently, requires either large quantities of the analyte or high input laser powers to obtain the molecular signatures. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering is one of the advanced and developed Raman techniques for overcoming these limitations (intrinsically low Raman signal intensity for low concentration of the analyte molecules)1. This is based on the huge electric field enhancements in the vicinity of nanostructured metals resulting in a strong Raman signal.

    In the present times, flexible SERS substrates have received great interest due to them possessing the advantages of (a) easy sampling by swabbing/wrapping directly on any curved/rough surfaces (b) large scalability by printing/roll to roll manufacturing/electrospinning etc. and (c) low overall cost of the sensing system. The development of handy flexible substrates with compact Raman devices/smart-phones can possibly provide portable sensors in real-world sensing/safety applications and serve as a powerful analytical tool for on-field analysis. For example, the possibility of detection of ultralow concentrations [picomolar (10−12 M or pM) to femtomolar (10−15 M or fM)] of two nerve gases, VX and Tabun was reported recently by Hakonen et al23. using flexible Au covered Si nanopillars (SERS substrates) and, significantly, using a handheld Raman spectrometer. Furthermore, the time involved in a typical detection can be reduced to practically acceptable levels (<5 sec) using these portable and low-cost disposable SERS substrates.

    Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)

    Martin Fleischmann and co-workers had reported a fortunate discovery way back in 1974, in which they observed enhanced Raman signals of a pyridine molecule adsorbed on an electrochemically roughened silver surface24. They reported the enhancement in the Raman cross-section of pyridine vibrations by a factor of ~106. This enhancement of the Raman signal in the vicinity of the metal nanostructure was named “surface-enhanced Raman scattering.” In the year 1977, Van Duyne25 and Albrecht26 groups separately explained the mechanism of enhanced Raman signals from the metal surface. In 1985, Moskovits et al27. reported all the primary explanations for the enhancement mechanisms such as (a) electromagnetic (EM) enhancement and (b) chemical (CM) enhancement. The long-range EM enhancement is attributed to the so-called localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) in the near-field metallic surface. The interaction of the incident EM field with metal NPs possessing negative real and small positive imaginary (absorption) dielectric constant induces a collective and coherent electron oscillations, called plasmons, in the vicinity of the NP or nanostructure (NS). The interaction of electromagnetic (EM) fields with the NPs affect their optical properties which are prevailed by the material’s dielectric constant at the excitation wavelength and also the surrounding media. The plasmonic noble-metal materials (mainly Au and Ag) exhibits high SERS activity because of their LSPR in the visible region, and the materials such as aluminum (Al), gallium (Ga), platinum (Pt) palladium (Pd), titanium (Ti), bismuth (Bi), indium (In), rhodium (Rh), and ruthenium (Ru), etc. exhibit the plasmonic resonance in the deep ultraviolet (UV) region28. Several review articles presented throughout this review discussed the significance of various optical materials used in SERS studies. The short-range CM enhancement is due to the charge transfer mechanism between the analyte molecule and the substrate29. Noble-metal-free SERS materials, for example semiconductors (Si, GaAs and etc.) and two-dimensional (2D) layered materials30, 31 (MoS2, graphene, HBN and etc.) exhibit the CM enhancement. Usually, Raman signals of the molecules can be enhanced by 104 to 1010 times because of the large EM enhancements supported and provided by the plasmonic nanostructures in close proximity (~1 nm). The CM enhancement is at least 2-3 orders of magnitude less than that of EM enhancement. During the last two decades, several scientists have extensively studied the effective parameters influencing the enhancement of the SERS signal32, 33. Enhancements in the Raman signal is a result of several contributions and it is virtually difficult to separate them into distinct components. Several factors including the platform, SERS active material, analyte properties, excitation laser mainly affect the enhancement of the Raman signals and are illustrated and explained as a schematic in Fig. 1.

    A schematic depicting the various parameters influencing the SERS signal.

    Figure 1.A schematic depicting the various parameters influencing the SERS signal.

    Reviews on different SERS studies

    A variety of review reports on SERS have been published over the last decades addressing the issues concerned with fabrication techniques, applications, and their developments. For example, Fan et al34. reviewed the various fabrication studies of SERS substrates such as electron-beam lithography, focused ion beam (FIB) milling, and also template-based techniques. The advantage of these nanostructured substrates is the fine control over the nanostructured geometries, which provide high reproducibility in the intensity of SERS signals. They discussed the application of those solid SERS substrates in biosensing, environmental, and optical fiber sensing. Mahadeva et al.35, in the year 2015, reviewed the applications of paper as sensors in different fields like electronic devices, biosensors, strain sensors, gas sensors, and piezoelectric devices. Further, their limitations in the commercialization of these devices were also discussed. Muehlethaler et al20. summarized (in the year 2016) the forensic applications of SERS in the detection of explosive vapors, CWA simulant, fire accelerants, gunshot residues, etc. Mosier-Boss et al18. reviewed the properties of metallic SERS substrates and their usage towards the detection of various molecules such as drugs, pesticides, explosives, BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes), dyes, cations, and anions. Furthermore, they addressed the usage of commercially available SERS substrates. Restaino et al36. (2018) reviewed the point of interest sample detection using flexible and porous SERS substrates. They described the various fabrication techniques with different sample collection methods and highlighted the unprecedented ease of use of the paper sensors. Senthamizhan et al37. reviewed the developments of the different electrospun nanofibers (metal oxide nanofiber, composite fibers) and their use as glucose sensors in the year 2016. Hakonen et al38. reviewed (in the year 2015) the trends and perspectives of the SERS substrates in the detection of explosives and chemical warfare agents. Ogundare et al39. reviewed extensively the cellulose-based SERS platforms including their fundamentals, fabrication approaches, and application in the detection of various probe molecules. Recently, Maddipatla et al40. reviewed the recent approaches and the future opportunities in the development of flexible sensors in the food, environmental, and defense fields. Sun et al19. reviewed the on-site application of SERS by the combined portable Raman spectrometer and SERS substrates (the year 2020). The choice of an appropriate substrate is extremely essential in the SERS measurements. The requirements of an ideal SERS substrate for practical applications are a) sensitivity (able to detect very low concentrations of analyte molecules), b) uniformity (similar SERS signal strength over the entire substrate), c) reproducibility (similar data should be obtained from measurements spanning different batches, time periods etc.), d) recyclability (should be able to detect different analyte molecules with a single substrates by simple cleaning and to reduce the cost of SERS substrates), e) stability (SERS signal should not fall drastically over a period of few weeks, at least), f) flexibility (should be able to collect samples from uneven surfaces), as well as g) low fabrication cost (ideally SERS substrates should cost less since the Raman spectrometer cost is very high). A schematic of key points of SERS substrates requirements is illustrated clearly in the Fig. 2. Each of these factors and their significance are discussed in detail in the next section.

    The ideal requirements of SERS substrates are summarized in this schematic.

    Figure 2.The ideal requirements of SERS substrates are summarized in this schematic.

    Sensitivity is the biggest virtue of a good SERS substrate is the detection of molecules at very low concentrations [traces meaning parts per billion (ppb) or parts per trillion (ppt) or parts per quadrillion (ppq)]. The sensitivity is generally expressed in terms of the lowest quantity of probe molecule detection possible with a given SERS substrate. The Raman signal disappears when the molecule concentrations reach a limit value. The sensitivity of the SERS substrate varies from molecule to molecule. The sensitivity of the SERS substrate is typically represented by the enhancement factor (limit of detection for a particular vibration mode of the probe molecule). Therefore, one should be judicious with the SERS substrate and select one with a higher enhancement factor or a lower limit of detection (LOD) over a wide range of analytes. Reproducibility is related to the variation of SERS intensity of the probe molecule over the NS surface. The smaller the variation in the signal, the higher the reproducibility and it is generally reported in terms of RSD (relative standard deviation) of the SERS signal. This depends mainly on the distribution of hotspots on the substrate. Low reproducibility of any SERS substrate affects the potential usage in practical applications. It is highly challenging to produce a highly reproducible SERS platform along with a homogeneous distribution of hotspots. The fluctuations of the SERS signals are calculated statistically with RSD of the particular mode intensity in the SERS spectrum. The magnitude of %RSD, indicative of the coefficient of variation, provides uncertainty in the measurement. Lower RSD values indicate a superior substrate in terms of reproducibility. Recyclability is another essential factor to test the usage of the same SERS substrate after detecting one/two molecules followed by proper cleaning procedures41. Xu et al42. developed recyclable hedgehog-shaped CuO NWs/Cu2O hetero NSs (with Ag coating) as SERS substrates. These hetero NS have demonstrated strong SERS activity (85% retained after 7 cycles of usage) driven by a broad band visible-light photocatalytic degradation process. Ag/CuO NWs/Cu2O composites were fabricated by ns laser ablation and subsequent thermal oxidation on the Cu sheet to develop Cu NWs on the grooved surface which was subsequently followed by Ag NPs deposition. The recyclability measurements were performed with the MG molecule by demonstrating seven-times consistent SERS performance. Stability is related to the variation of the sensitivity of SERS substrate with respect to time. This aging effect for the SERS substrates is also another important factor for storage in air/vacuum for days/months/year and their performance afterwards. Finally, the fabrication cost of the substrates is very important for the bulk production and commercialization of substrates for regular usage. Despite the long history of SERS, flexibility garnered much interest only recently because of easy sample collection from any uneven surface by simple swabbing/swiping etc. Producing uniform, stable, and highly sensitive SERS substrates has been a major obstacle for real-field applications. Therefore, the main task for the SERS community has been to develop the substrates with high sensitivity/reproducibility, long stability, low cost, and easy to handle, as well as flexible for sample collection.

    The important results from the literature survey over the last 5−10 years concerning the usage of flexible SERS substrate for various hazardous materials detection is also summarized in this article. A large number of papers have been published in this area. To demonstrate the magnitude of research, a simple search for papers published in the journals and conferences, including the title/keywords/abstract “flexible Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy” or “flexible Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering” or “flexible SERS” as indexed by the Scopus search engine, resulted in typically >100 papers in 2019, >100 papers in 2020 and >40 in the year 2021 alone. The corresponding data obtained is plotted as a bar graph and is shown inFig. 3. The identification of all the developments and practical applications of flexible SERS studies in various fields will be difficult to be presented in this review. Therefore, we have acknowledged the most important recent review articles and those are listed in the Table 1 below. The readers are suggested to select and pursue the review based on their interest(s). This review is limited to the recent studies (typically during the last 3−4 years) on flexible SERS substrates used in the detection of hazardous materials, rather than including broad discussions on solid SERS substrates (nanostructures on solid targets and metal NPs suspension on the solid platform) and their developments, which is a huge field. This review is warranted because of the extremely rapid developments in the area of different nanomaterials synthesized (for SERS studies including plasmonic and non-plasmonic), novel methodologies developed for incorporating various nanoparticles in different flexible platforms, and detection of diverse analyte molecules.

    Year wise publications on flexible SERS substrates obtained through a search in SCOPUS.

    Figure 3.Year wise publications on flexible SERS substrates obtained through a search in SCOPUS.

    • Table 1. Important review articles on various applications of SERS that have been reported in the last three-years (2019–2021).

      Table 1. Important review articles on various applications of SERS that have been reported in the last three-years (2019–2021).

      S. No.AuthorReview topicRef.
      1Zhang et al.Flexible SERS substrates and recent advances in food safety analysisref.43
      2Yin et al.Recent process of 2D materials in SERSref.30
      3Klapec et al.2016–2019 published literature on the forensic related molecules and their various detection techniques using SERSref.44
      4Li et al.Fabrication and applications of flexible, transparent SERS substratesref.45
      5Forbes et al.Developed and challenges of SERS sensor in the detection of inorganic based explosivesref.46
      6Ji Sun et al.SERS substrate developments and combination with other technologies in on-site analysis using portable Raman spectrometerref.19
      7Jingjing et al.Different dimensional (0D, 1D, 2D and 3D) SERS substrates for explosive detectionref.47
      8Shvalya et al.Plasmonic NPs and 3D plasmonic NSs sensors with biological, medical, military, and chemical applicationsref.48
      9To et al.Explosive trace detection technologies and latest advancesref.49
      10Ren et al.Qualitative and quantitative analysis; strategies of practical application of SERS substratesref.50
      11Huang et al.Paper SERS substrates in food safetyref.51
      12Chen et al.2D SERS substrates in chemical and biosensingref.52
      13Dinesh et al.Flexible sensor fabrication with various printing techniquesref.40
      14Xue et al.Flexible nanofiber-based substrates fabrication and applicationref.53
      15Ogundare et al.Cellulose-based SERS substrates: fundamentals and principlesref.39
      16Zamora Sequeira et al.Various methods for the determination of pesticidesref.2
      17Piolt et al.Key aspects of SERS and application in the biomedical fieldref.54
      18Ogundare et al.Cellulose substrate fundamental, preparation methods, and applicationsref.39
      19Lee et al.Analyte manipulation and hybrid SERS platforms for real-world applicationsref.55
      20Xu et al.Latest advances of flexible SERS substrates in point of care diagnostic in tunable, sample swapping and in-situ SERS detection highlightsref.56
      21Zhang et al.Electrospinning NPs based material and their sensing applicationref.57
      22Restaino et al.Plasmonic paper SERS substrates-preparation methods and sample collectionsref.36

    Flexible SERS substrates

    A forthright method to achieve the SERS-active substrates is to dry the colloidal NPs (preferably plasmonic) solution on any of the glass/silicon/paper/metal surfaces.1 Depending on the platform where these NPs/NSs are deposited, the SERS substrates can be classified as either rigid or flexible. Rigid SERS substrates are accomplished via deposition of colloidal solutions on the surface of the glass or silicon or metal sheet and patterned glass/silicon/metal sheets [e.g., metal-insulator-metal structures Au-SiO2-Au59]. Alternatively, flexible SERS platforms can be achieved from the usage of cellulose papers, textiles, thin films, polymers, adhesive tapes60-64, etc. Both rigid and flexible SERS substrates have their exclusive advantages and disadvantages. Solid SERS substrates usually display better recyclability, signal homogeneity, and higher enhancement factors. However, the cost and sample collection have a considerable impact on daily practical usage of any SERS substrate. Apart from the detection of molecules, flexible substrates have potential in several applications such as fabrication of electronic devices65 (diodes, transistors, energy storage devices, etc.), food safety66, cancer screening67, and pathogens multiplex detection68, uric acid in human tears69.

    The capabilities of flexible SERS substrates have gained tremendous research interest due to

    • Inexpensive fabrication procedures making it possible to prepare large area substrates.

    • Easy-to-use nature for on-site detection of a wide range of probe molecules.

    • Flexibility in sample collection, i.e., possible to collect the probe molecules/sample directly from any rough surface (e.g., suitcase, bag, table surface, fruit, etc.) with the substrate by simple swabbing/swiping.

    The merits of the SERS technique with the portable Raman spectrometer now widely used in national security, food safety, and environmental monitoring.

    Recently explosives detection was approached by fabricating various flexible SERS substrates. Liyanage et al58. synthesized flexible SERS sensors with an adhesive film (Scotch magic-tape) loaded with Au triangular nanoprisms by simple self-assembly method as shown in Fig. 4. The estimated LOD of TNT, RDX, and PETN was ~900, ~50, and ~50 ppq (parts per quadrillion), respectively. Furthermore, they have also demonstrated direct sampling detection of TNT which was collected from fingerprints by simple swabbing of samples which were prepared by placing the thumb onto a series of 10 glass slides. And they successfully proved these flexible SERS substrates have the stability with a “shelf life” of at least 5 months. Gao et al70. synthesized light trapping wrinkled nanocones (50−60 nm) flexible SERS substrates using colloidal (polystyrene microspheres-1 µm) lithography and oxygen plasma etching (5 minutes) on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film followed by 30 nm gold film by electron beam deposition. The optimized wrinkled nanocone 4-ATP labelled flexible substrate was used to detect four explosive molecules RDX, HMX, PETN, and TNT. The TNT residue collection and SERS spectra of TNT residues from the cloth bag by bended to brush collection is followed by 5 min immersion in 4-ATP-labelled AgNPs.

    Explosive trace detection using flexible SERS substrates detection of TNT, RDX, and PETN using self-assembly triangular nanoprisms on adhesive tape. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.58, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 4.Explosive trace detection using flexible SERS substrates detection of TNT, RDX, and PETN using self-assembly triangular nanoprisms on adhesive tape. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.58, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Paper-based SERS substrates

    A detailed literature survey revealed that a variety of papers were used (as a base material) for preparing the SERS substrates such as filter paper71, chromatography paper72, A4 sized paper73, tissue papers74, and different GCM grade papers75. The porosity of the paper (which is typically a few µm) will affect the retention of NPs on its surface. There are numerous approaches for the fabrication of paper-based SERS substrates reported in recent literature including physical vapor deposition76, 77, dipping method67, 71, in-situ growth of metal NPs78, 79, hydrophilic wells by wax printing followed by drop-casting of the NPs80, pen-on-paper technique73, inkjet printing72, 81, etc.. Some of these techniques of the fabrication of paper substrates, collated from a few recent research reports, is illustrated in Fig. 5. The in-situ synthesis implies soaking of a cellulose paper in metal salts such as AgNO3/HAuCl4 in conjunction with reducing agents (such as NaBH4/citric acid/Tollens agent). These methods later require additional processing such as heating/plasma treatment/rinsing/cleaning. Therefore, these synthesis procedures need multiple cycle processes82-84. Dip coating is a unpretentious method in which the NPs have to be first synthesized, then the NPs are deposited on to the paper. However, the NPs loading depends on the absorbance and soaking time of the paper (a comprehensive discussion on the above techniques is provided in ref.1). Several recent studies have demonstrated the utility of different approaches for improving the loading [e.g., prior soaking of paper in NaCl, Glycidyl-trimethyl-ammonium chloride (GTAC)]85, 86. The advantage of dip coating/immersion method is its ability to deposit NPs with different shapes, sizes, and compositions on the paper87-89. Another popular fabrication method is the inkjet/screen printing, which is a simple method of deposition of NPs on paper using a commercial desktop inkjet printer. The efficacy of the SERS substrate depends on the designing of substrate patterns, which is to preserve the viscosity and surface tension of the NPs ink, and printing cycles to upsurge the density of NPs. Inkjet printing offers easy-to-design complex geometries using a personal computer and it is feasible to print already prepared NPs (by laser-based or chemical methods) and in-situ synthesis is also possible by loading precursor agents in different color ink cartridges90. Furthermore, to improve the SERS substrate efficiency and to avoid unwanted spreading of NPs, hydrophobic modification of paper has been exploited before the printing of NPs91.

    Various fabrication techniques used for paper-based SERS substrates. (a) Vapor deposition. (b) Inkjet printing. (c) Dipping. (d) Pen-on-paper. (e) Drop-casting on hydrophilic wells. (f) Self assembling. (g) In-situ reduction. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.77, (b) ref.72, The Royal Society of Chemistry; ref.71, American Chemical Society; (d) ref.73, John Wiley and Sons; (e) ref.80, Springer Nature; (f) ref.84, (g) ref.79, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 5.Various fabrication techniques used for paper-based SERS substrates. (a) Vapor deposition. (b) Inkjet printing. (c) Dipping. (d) Pen-on-paper. (e) Drop-casting on hydrophilic wells. (f) Self assembling. (g) In-situ reduction. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.77, (b) ref.72, The Royal Society of Chemistry; ref.71, American Chemical Society; (d) ref.73, John Wiley and Sons; (e) ref.80, Springer Nature; (f) ref.84, (g) ref.79, American Chemical Society.

    Kim et al92. used a silicon rubber mask (3 mm diameter and 1 mm thickness) to construct SERS sensor arrays. Gold nanorods (AuNR, L/D: 44±2/10±1 nm) were dispersed on top of RC cellulose with vacuum-assisted filtration method on each well on RC hydrogel. The SERS activity and these AuNR array film was examined as a function of the AuNRs volume (8, 10, 12 and 14 µL) and different drying times (1,2, 3 and 24 hours), and better SERS activity is noticed for 12 µL with increasing drying time. These SERS arry demonstrated the simultaneous detection of multiple hazardous chemicals such as R6G (10 pM), RB, CV, 4-ATP, BPE, thiram (100 fM), tricyclazole, difenoconazole, and mancozeb. And the Multi-SERS spectra of thiram are recorded from each AuNR array on RC film. [i) 10 μM; ii) 1 μM; iii) 100 nM; iv) 10 nM; v) 1 nM]. And also, bending cycle tests were conducted for 500 times. These results show good sensitivity, stability and repeatability of low-cost flexible SERS substrates. Li Xian et al93. fabricated cellulose nanocrystal-Ag NPs embedded filter paper SERS substrate via in situ reduction. These CNC–Ag paper substrates were modified by soaking in dodecyl mercaptan at different concentrations ranging from 10−4 to 10−18 g/mL. The concentration was optimized as 10−12 g/mL by performing contact angle and SERS measurements. Finally, the optimized SERS substrate was used to detect phenylethanolamine A and metronidazole with a LOD of 5 nM and 200 nM. Lan et al74. reported the inkjet-printed paper-based semiconducting (MoO3−x) SERS substrates to detect CV and MG on the fish surface by swabbing. Previously, our group presented a systematic study94 on the fabrication of versatile low-cost FP flexible SERS substrates loaded with salt-induced aggregated Ag/Au NPs. The SERS substrates were subsequently prepared by soaking the FP in aggregated NPs by simple addition of different concentrations of NaCl (1 to 100 mM). The detailed SERS measurements were indicated that the Ag/Au NPs with 50 mM NaCl concentration is the optimal SERS performance. This optimized FP with aggregated Ag/Au NPs were used detect four adsorbed molecules MB-5 nM, PA-5 μM, DNT-1 μM, and NTO-10 μM using portable Raman spectrometer. The schematic of FP SERS preparation (a) the SEM image of FP (b) without and (c) with NPs and the SERS spectra of explosive molecules (right side) are shown in Fig. 6.

    Filter paper based SERS substrate by aggregated Ag/Au NPs for explosive molecule detection (Left side) (a) schematic of substrate preparation (b) and (c) FESEM images of bare filter and aggregated Ag NPs (Right side) SERS spectra of (a) PA (b) DNT (c) NTO using FP with optimized aggregated Ag NPs. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.94, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 6.Filter paper based SERS substrate by aggregated Ag/Au NPs for explosive molecule detection (Left side) (a) schematic of substrate preparation (b) and (c) FESEM images of bare filter and aggregated Ag NPs (Right side) SERS spectra of (a) PA (b) DNT (c) NTO using FP with optimized aggregated Ag NPs. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.94, American Chemical Society.

    Lin et al95. reported the PDMS assisted paper based SERS platform for the on-site monitoring of food safety. Firstly, Au@Ag nanorods (NRs) are synthesized using seed mediated growth, and are deposited on filter paper through self-assembly technique. Finally, dual functional SERS platform was made via side of the paper with the NPs affixed onto PDMS using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) tape, as the schematic shows in Fig. 7(a). The SERS platform optimized by Au@Ag NRs with 1 to 6 layers were also assembled on the filter paper, and SERS measurements (CV) demonstrated that the Raman intensity of the probe molecule gradually decreases as the number of layers increases. The optimized monolayer SERS paper-based PDMS-assisted platform was used to detect thiram (0.75 ppm) on the surface of orange by just simple wiping and the presence of PDMS enables higher performance with better sensitivity of SERS. Further, various concentrations of thiram on orange surface (from 0.5 ppm to 50 ppm) and the concentration versus intensity Langmuir adsorption for the Raman spectra are shown in Fig. 7(b).

    (a) A schematic of the synthesis of dual-functional PDMS-assisted paper-based SERS platform. (b) (i) The photograph of a sample collection from orange surface. (ii) A comparison of SERS spectra of CV with and without PDMS. (iii) SERS spectra of different concentrations of thiram (0.5−50 ppm). (iv) The peak intensity at 1380 cm−1 of thiram in orange juice as a function of the spiked sample concentration. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.95, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 7.(a) A schematic of the synthesis of dual-functional PDMS-assisted paper-based SERS platform. (b) (i) The photograph of a sample collection from orange surface. (ii) A comparison of SERS spectra of CV with and without PDMS. (iii) SERS spectra of different concentrations of thiram (0.5−50 ppm). (iv) The peak intensity at 1380 cm−1 of thiram in orange juice as a function of the spiked sample concentration. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.95, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Polymer-based SERS substrates

    Nanofiber mats

    Electrospinning is a method of translation of polymeric solution/melt (with or without additives) into solid nanofibers by applying the electric field1. The electrospun nanofiber films are identical to paper substrates in many aspects. For example, they have similar flexibility, porosity, and a high surface area. Moreover, their morphology, thickness, porosity, etc. (of the nanofiber films) can be varied by judiciously choosing the experimental parameters (i.e., solution parameters, process parameters, and ambient parameters)53, 96-98. The concentration of polymer solution being used demonstrates an essential role in the electrospun fiber fabrication. At very low concentrations of the polymer solution, electrospraying occurs instead of electrospinning. Therefore, micro/nanodroplets are deposited on the collector drum. With a slight increase in polymer solution concentration, a mixture of microbeads and fibers has been observed1. Smooth nanofibers are observed at an appropriate concentration depending on the polymer molecular weight. If the concentration is too high, nanofibers will not be formed, and only micro-ribbons will be observed1. Therefore, with an increase in the concentration of the polymer solution, the obtained fiber diameter will increase. Usually, the viscosity and surface tension of the solution can be modified by altering the concentration of the used polymer. At a very low viscosity or surface tension, continuous and smooth fibers cannot be attained. If the viscosity of the polymer solution is very high, it results in the hard ejection of polymer jet from the syringe needle. The polymer molecular weight also affects the fiber morphology as a decrease in the molecular weight tends to form more beads rather than smooth fibers. Husain et al99. analyzed the fiber morphology of PLGA [poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)] in acetone with a varying concentration between 2 and 25 wt%. At low concentration (2−4 wt%), a mixture of particles and beads-on strings are observed, and at high concentration (20−25 wt%), only fibers are obtained. The fiber morphology can be tuned with the processing parameters such as the applied voltage for the electrostatic force, flow rate, nozzle-collector distance, fiber collector humidity, and temperature, etc. Recently, Wan et al.100 reported SiO2 electrospun nanofiber loaded with Ag/Au nanoparticles SERS substrate with high sensitivity –10–11 mol/L, stability – 60 days, repeatability for various molecules (S. aureus, thiram, 4-MPh, and 4-MPA), and the schematic is illustrated in Fig. 8.

    Fabrication of flexible SERS substrates for Ag@T-A@SiO2-Au nanofibrous substrates. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.100, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Figure 8.Fabrication of flexible SERS substrates for Ag@T-A@SiO2-Au nanofibrous substrates. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.100, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    The SERS performance of nanofiber depends on the properties of

    • nanofibers (polymer nature, fiber diameter, the morphology of the nanofibers, and spinning time, etc.) and

    • nanoparticles101 (material type, size, shape, composition, and density), etc.

    • Decoration of NPs on the fiber102, 103 (within the fiber, the surface of the fiber, etc.)

    • The loading of NPs on the nanofiber mat leads to the NPs assembly with extremely small spacing providing scope for abundant hot spots. These play a crucial factor in SERS response.

    Electrospinning polymer fibers can be used as SERS substrates by loading plasmonic NPs; similar to paper substrates, several methods are reported for embedding metal NPs onto the electrospun polymer films like dispersion of metal precursor and pre-mixing of metal NPs into the polymer solution and surface medications after electrospinning. Chamuah et al104. demonstrated the Au deposition after electrospinning PVA nanofiber. Recently, Motamedi et al105. added laser-ablated Au NPs in Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) solution before electrospinning. Zhang et al106. performed different trials on the addition of Au nanorods in the PVA solution before electrospinning. Zhang et al107. have performed a detailed study on fabrication of electrospun nanofibrous surface decorated with Ag NPs. Amidoxime surface-functionalized polyacrylonitrile (ASFPAN) nanofibrous membranes surface-decorated with Ag NPs using electrospinning followed by the seed-mediated electroless plating. A series of SERS substrates were prepared by altering the reaction time (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes) and stirring conditions (stirring and non-stirring) during the electroless plating deposition of Ag NPs. The change in the size, shape, and aggregation of Ag NPs on the surface of nanofibrous membrane and their effect on SERS efficiency were evaluated. The best SERS sensitivity was noticed for ASFPAN-Ag NPs nanofibrous membrane at 3 minutes under non-stirring condition, the corresponding reflectance, SEM and TEM images shown in Fig. 9. These optimized SERS substrates detect 10 ppb R6G and 4-MBA.

    (a) Reflectance spectra of the ASFPAN nanofibrous membranes with Ag NPs; Photographs of three nanofibrous membranes (PAN, ASFPAN, and ASFPAN-Ag NPs) are shown in the inset. (b) SEM image and (c) TEM image of ASFPAN nanofibers (3 min). Inset in (c) shows the size distribution of Ag NPs.107, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 9.(a) Reflectance spectra of the ASFPAN nanofibrous membranes with Ag NPs; Photographs of three nanofibrous membranes (PAN, ASFPAN, and ASFPAN-Ag NPs) are shown in the inset. (b) SEM image and (c) TEM image of ASFPAN nanofibers (3 min). Inset in (c) shows the size distribution of Ag NPs.107, American Chemical Society.

    Recently flexible polymer-based (PDMS108, PMMA109, PET110, PVDF111, 112, etc.) SERS substrates have gained interest from various research groups. Wang et al113. have synthesized the sandwiched Au@Ag NPs [between adhesive acrylic polymer tape and polyethene terephthalate (PET)] film using the self-assembly method. Here, PET film was used to protect the Au@Ag NPs array from environment for long-term stability (60 days). While performing the SERS measurements, the protection PET film was peeled off carefully, and the T/Au@Ag substrate was utilized for sensing CV-1 nM with a LOD of ~9×10−10 M. These flexible T/Au@Ag substrates were further investigated for realistic applications like thiram residues extracted from the peel of apple, tomato, and cucumber. Zhang et al114. reported low cost large area high-throughput nanostructured polymer flexible SERS substrate, the schematic shown in Fig. 10(a). These were prepared in three steps (1) preparation of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) mold (2) formation of polymer nanostructure using roll-to-roll ultraviolet (365 nm, 40 mW/cm2) nanoimprint lithography (R2R UV-NIL) technique (3) Au coating on polymer nanostructures by ion sputtering. Here, the effect of Au coating thickness 15, 30, 45, 60 nm on SERS was investigated by varying the sputtering durations of 90, 180, 270, and 360 s, respectively. The SERS performance was assessed with probe molecule R6G and it was noticed 30 nm Au coating substrate shows the highest Raman signal with EF 1.21×107. Subsequently, the flexible effect on SERS under some mechanical deformations was investigated with different bending angles (10°, 45° and 80°) and bending cycles (0, 100 and 200). In the SERS signal intensity and peak positions plot, there was also no obvious difference with the corresponding spectra shown in Fig. 10(b) and 10(c).

    (a) Schematic diagram representing the fabrication process of Au covered polymer nanostructure arrays using roll-to-roll ultraviolet nanoimprint lithography (R2R UV-NIL) technique (b) and (c) SERS spectra of R6G from 30 nm Au coating flexible substrate at different bending angles and bending cycles, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.114, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Figure 10.(a) Schematic diagram representing the fabrication process of Au covered polymer nanostructure arrays using roll-to-roll ultraviolet nanoimprint lithography (R2R UV-NIL) technique (b) and (c) SERS spectra of R6G from 30 nm Au coating flexible substrate at different bending angles and bending cycles, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.114, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Fang et al115. recently reported polymer [polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)] based flexible SERS substrates fabricated using versatile femtosecond [290 fs, 1030 nm, 200 kHz, 1500 mW] laser direct writing technique. 3D patterned polymer micro-/nano-structures were obtained and were subsequently coated with Ag using thermal evaporation technique. These flexible SERS substrates were used to detect R6G at a concentration of 10−7 M. The advantages of the fs laser processing were its simplicity, high-speed, and possibility of preparing large area substrates, which leads to bulk sample preparation for practical applications. Over the last few years, our research group at the University of Hyderabad, India has successfully fabricated a variety of SERS substrates using fs laser ablation of bulk targets such as Au116-118, Si119, 120, and Ag121, and optimized them by varying the various laser parameters. In future, we aim to prepare low-cost flexible SERS substrates using fs laser pulses for easy sample collection and real-world applications. The nanocolloids and nanostructures obtained with fs laser ablation (in liquids) technique are ubiquitous and versatile. The recent developments in this area of research have proven that these can now be produced in large quantities.

    Textile based SERS substrates

    The textile fabrics have also been investigated as an attractive SERS substrate (akin to paper and electrospun fiber substrate) because the fabric is naturally strong, flexible, soft, and a lightweight material. In textiles, various materials are available such as cotton, wool, silk, etc.. Comparable to other flexible substrates, the loading of NPs can be done in two ways, i.e., in-situ synthesis [soaking in different metal salts] and direct deposition of NPs [anisotropic silver nano-prisms and nano-disks to wool fabric has been reported recently122]. Liu et al123. synthesized silk fabrics SERS substrate by soaking in HAuCl4 (0.1−0.6 mM, 50 mL) for 30 minutes, followed by heating and cleaning. These Au NPs loaded silk fabrics were used to detect CV, 4-MPy, and PATP. Chen et al124. fabricated Ag-based cotton fabric by soaking in AgNO3 (50−250 mM) followed by reduce-drying (30 °C for 30 min) process. The fabric soaked in 200 mM demonstrated better sensitivity (10−12 M) with 20% reproducibility and 57 days stability in the detection of p-Aminothiophenol. Furthermore, these fabric substrates are having other applications UV protection, antibacterial, and self-cleaning125, 126. Gao et al127. reported wash free metallic textile utilization as flexible SERS substrate for the detection of fungicide. They fabricated Ag-coated cotton fabric using magneton sputtering and the SERS performance was optimized with Ag film thickness as 100 nm from the series of thickness such as 50, 100, 150 and 200 nm on cotton fabric using MB as a probe molecule. The optimized 100 nm Ag-cotton fabric substrate used to detect MB at a low concentration of 10−12 M, for the real time usage they detected thiram on 10 ppb. Additionally, they have shown the reusability of these substrates by alternative usage of MB and MG, this dye droplet was removed by a simple stream of air. Lu et al128. synthesized carbon fiber cloth substrate loaded with 3D Ag nanodendrites by electrochemical deposition. SERS substrate preparation was optimized by studying the effect of deposition voltage (1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 V) and deposition time (80, 120, 160, 200, 240 s), and the optimal SERS substrate was selected by observing nanodendrites morphology and SERS efficiency as under a voltage of 1.3 V and with deposition time of 160 s, shown in Fig. 11. They reported the detection of 1 pM CV and simultaneous detection of three other molecules (4-MBA –5 ppm, DDTC –5 ppm, and thiram –5 ppm). They presented the real time detection data (SERS spectra) of thiram (5 ppm) and MG (5 ppm), respectively, on superhydrophobic AgNDs/carbon fiber cloth substrate. Further, they also demonstrated the detection of thiram and MG simultaneously in real lake water using superhydrophobic Ag NDs/carbon fiber cloth substrate. Zhang et al129. recently reported the synthesis of non-woven (NW) fabric based SERS substrate and utilized for carbaryl pesticides trace detection on fruits surfaces. NW@polydopamine (PDA) @AgNPs fabrics SERS substrates were fabricated by in-situ growth using mussel-inspired PDA molecules. The schematic of the fabrication of flexible NW@PDA@Ag NPs substrate and their utilization by simple swabbing method are illustrated in Fig. 11(a). The substrate was optimized by monitoring the immersion time of NW@PDA fabrics in the [Ag(NH3)2]+ solution. With increasing the immersion time from 4 hours to 12 hours, the amount of Ag NPs on fabric was increased, and the superior SERS signal was noticed for 12 hours. The optimized flexible NW@PDA@Ag NPs substrates were subsequently utilized to detect the sprayed diluted carbaryl on the surfaces of apples, oranges, and bananas. The collected SERS spectra of carbyl with concentrations ranging from mM to pM are shown in Fig. 11(b). This is a rapidly growing area of research and has strong potential in the preparation and utilization of flexible SERS substrates for detection of hazardous materials. Different plasmonic nanoparticles (sizes, shapes, preparation methods, concentrations etc.) need to tested and methods optimized with these textiles before we can think of any practical application.

    (a) Schematic of flexible non-woven fabric based substrate and the (b) SERS spectra of carbyl on apples, oranges, and bananas surfaces. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.129, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Figure 11.(a) Schematic of flexible non-woven fabric based substrate and the (b) SERS spectra of carbyl on apples, oranges, and bananas surfaces. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.129, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Table 2 summarizes the most important details of recently reported flexible SERS substrates including their preparation methods, materials used in those studies, and the sensitivities achieved. Such data is extremely important since the developments are occurring at a rapid pace and it is imperative to identify the strengths and weakness of each of these methodologies to come up with a viable and practical technique for making robust flexible SERS substrates. These flexible SERS substrates find niche applications in the detection of various hazardous materials in Defence, food, and environmental safety issues. Sensitivity estimations are reported in various parameters such as Molar (M), parts per billion (ppb), nanogram (ng), ng/cm2 and mg/kg. For example, in case of Thiram molecule (molecular weight of 240.44) 10 ppb is ~0.42 nM which is equivalent to ~1 pg in 10 µL; 1 ppb = 1 µg/kg; 1 ppm = 1000 ppb. Table 3 represents a summary of the commercially available SERS substrates (which is not exhaustive) and it is evident that each one of them have varied properties including the sensitivity, stability, and cost. Liu et al130. provided a comprehensive evaluation of six commercial substrates [Enspectrc-1 (Silicon based), Q-SERSTM-1 (Silicon based), Ocean optics-3 (paper based Ag, Au; glass based Ag/Au) and Hamamatsu substrate-1 (Au NS on polypropylene)] including their sensitivity and reproducibility studies using the molecules of MB, BPE, 4-MBA. The SERS spectra recorded with XploRA-Plus Raman micro-spectrometer at 532 and 785 nm excitation wavelengths. From the results the authors observed optimized signals in the case of Enspectrc SERS substrate for all the three molecules at 532 nm; Q-SERSTM substrate for 4-MBA and BPE at 785 nm; Hamamatsu substrate for MB with 785 nm excitation. Hakonen et al131. have reported the SERS-based detection of forensic substances (Cyclosarin, RDX, Amphetamine and PA) using commercially available substrates and handheld Raman spectrometers. The same could be extended to flexible substrates provided they are efficient (providing high enhancements) for field applications. Further detailed research is required in this direction.

    • Table 2. Summary of the recent flexible SERS substrates, their preparation methods, materials used, and the sensitivities achieved (2014-2021).

      Table 2. Summary of the recent flexible SERS substrates, their preparation methods, materials used, and the sensitivities achieved (2014-2021).

      Flexible substrate typeHazardous material type studiedMethod usedSERS active materialMolecules investigated - sensitivityRef.
      Paper/CelluloseExplosivesInkjet printingPABT modified-Ag NPs-A4 paperTNT- pMref.132
      In-situAg NPs in agarose film supported on filter paperTNT- 10−8 M ref.78
      ImmersionAg nano triangles-filter paperPA- 10−6 M p-ATP- 10−8 M ref.88
      SoakingAggregated Ag/Au NPs-filter paperPA- 5 µM DNT- 1 µM NTO- 10 µM ref.94
      Drop castingStar-shaped Au NPsPA-5 µMref.133
      ReductionAg Nanostructures- filter paper Whatman 42Urea nitrate- 10−6 M CV- 10−8 M ref.134
      DrugsInkjet printingAg- chromatography paperOrganophosphate malathion –413 pg, Heroin –9 ng, Cocaine –15 ng ref.135
      Plasma assisted chemical depositionAu-Whatman filter paper grade 1 Cocaine- 1 ng/mlref.136
      DyesIn-situAg NPs-polydopamine -Filter paperR6g- 10−10 M MG residue on Fish scales- 0.04635 pg/cm2, Crab shells- 0.06952 pg/cm2 and Shrimp skins- 0.09270 pg/cm2ref.137
      Inkjet-printingMoO3−x nanosheets on Chromatographic paper, printing paper, filter paper R6g- 10–7 M CV- 10–6 M and MG- 10–6 M on fish surface ref.74
      In-situAu-filter paper (Advantec #1)MG-damped fish– 10 ppbref.138
      PesticidesSilver mirror reactionAg- filter paperThiram- 10−7 M ref.139
      Pen on paperAu NPs (15–120 nm); Au NRs (50 nm long, 14 nm thick); Ag NPs (50-80 nm) –A4 paper, Filter paperThiabendazole < 20 ppbref.73
      Airbrush spray methodAg NPs -glass fibre paperEnoxacin & Enrofloxacin- 10 −5 M ref.140
      PrintingAu@Ag 30 nm Au core & 7 nm Ag shell -filter paperThiram- 10−9 M ref.141
      Screen printingAg NPs/GO- paperThiram 0.26 ng cm−2Thiabendazole 28 ng cm−2Methylparathion 7.4 ng cm−2ref.142
      Immersion followed by APTMSAg NPs-PDMS spongeTriazophos 0.79 ng Methyl Parathion 1.58 ng ref.143
      Vacuum-assisted filtrationAuNPs- cellulose nanofiberThiram- 1 pM Tricyclazole- 10 pM ref.144
      In-situAu NPs-pseudo-paperThiram- 1.1 ng/cm2ref.145
      Laser techniquesAu/Ag film-print paperFungicide mancozeb (Dithane DG) and insecticide thiamethoxam (Aktara 25 BG)ref.146
      Immerson in NaCl solution for 5 min +dip-coatingAg NPs- filter PaperMelamine- 1 ppm Thiram- 1 ppm ref.147
      ImmersionFP-Au NPsMethyl parathion- 0.011 μg/cm2ref.148
      In-situNanocellulose fibers-Ag NPsThiram- 0.05 ppm Thiabendazole- 0.09 ppm, MG 0.0014 ppm Enrofloxaci- 0.069 ppm ref.149
      Silicon rubber mask and a vacuum filtration Au NRs -cellulose hydrogelsThiram- 100 fMref.92
      Drop castingQuartz paper/Cellulose nanofiber/ mixture (Ag NPs+Au NSs)Ferbam on kale leaves (50 µg/kg)ref.150
      Vacuum filtrationCellulose nanofibers-Au NPsThiram- 10−8M ref.151
      Drop casting, inkjet printingAu NPs-Whatman 44 FPBenzenethiol chemical aerosol Pyridine ref.152
      Vacuum filtrationGlass-fiber filter paper-Ag NWs coupled with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)DNAref.153
      Electrochemical depositionMesoporous Au film@Ag NWs@cellulose nanofiber paperR6g - 100 fM Thiram - 10 fM 2-naphthalenethiol-1 ppb ref.154
      Self-assemblingCellulose nanofibers -Ag@DNA/PDA (polydopamine)Rhodamine 6G. Thiamethoxamon- 0.003 mg/kg. ref.155
      Cotton budsAntibioticsIn situ reductionAg NPs-cellulose nanocrystals-Filter paperPhenylethanolamine A-10−9 M Metronidazole- 10−7 M ref.93
      ExplosivesSelf-assembly & In situAg NPs-cotton swab2,4 DNT- 5 ngref.156
      PesticidesSoaking, freezing, and dryingAg NPs-chitosan foamTriasophols Methidathion Isocrabophos ref.157
      Dipping & dryingAg NPs-cotton swab with NaClThiabendazole (TBZ), thiram, TBZ + thiram ref.158
      3D- spongeExplosivesIn situAg NPs -polyurethane spongePerchlorates- 0.13 ng CChlorates- 0.13 ng Nitrates- 0. 11 ng ref.159
      Nanofiber matPesticidesElectrospinningAu coated PVA nanofiberDeltamethrin- 0.33 mg/kg Quinalphos- 0.28 mg/kg Thiacloprid- 0.26 mg/kg ref.104
      CWA simulantsElectrospinningAu NPs –PVA nanofiberMethyl salicylateref.160
      DyesElectrospinningAg NPs-PVA nanofiberR6G-10−5 M ref.161
      Electrospinning and in-situAg NPs-Polyimide (PI) nanofabricp-Aminothiophenol (p-ATP)- 10−14 mol/L), ref.162
      FabricPesticidesSelf-assembly/in-situAg NPs- non woven fabricIsocarbophos Sumicidin Phosgene ref.163
      Dip coatingTriangular Ag nanoplates-Cotton fabricCarbaryl- 10−5M ref.164
      In situPolydopamine mediated Ag-Au NPs – cotton fabricCarbaryl- 10−6M ref.165
      Magneton sputteringAg NPs-cotton fabricThiram - 1 ppmref.127
      Magnetron sputteringAg-polyester fabricR6G on cucumber, MG and Thiramref.166
      Photochemical deposition (254 nm)Ag NPs on TiO2 coated polyester fiber membranes Sodium saccharin in soft drinks- 0.3 mg/L, (cola and sprite)ref.167
      In-situ growthAg NPs-Cotton fabricsPATP-10−8 M ref.168
      Vacuum evaporationAg coated (10 nm) nylon fabricsPATP-10−9 M Thiram on cucumber surface-10−7 M ref.169
      DyesVacuum thermal evaporation and high-temperature annealingAg NPs-carbon fiber clothR6g- 10−14 mol·L−1ref.170
      PolymersExplosivesOriented stacking and in-situAg and Au–Ag nanoplates- PETTNT- 10 nM RDX- 10 nM ref.171
      Self-assemblingAu triangular nanoprisms on adhesive film (Scotch magic-tape)TNT- 900 ppq RDX- 50 ppq and PETN- 50 ppq ref.58
      Incubated overnight followed by thorough rinsing dryingAu NPs,Au NRs and Au NCs on elastomeric film (PDMS)TNT vaporref.172
      Gravure printingAg NPs-PETDNT vaporref.173
      Sol–gel method and magnetron sputteringAg NPs-Porous silica aerogelsNTO- 7.94×10−10 M ref.174
      UV lithography and Au deposition Ag NPs-Au coated -nanowrinkled zigzag micropattern on PDMS layerTNT- 10−13 mol·L−1TNT residue(10−9 mol·L−1) on cloth bag ref.175
      DyesElectron-beam evaporation-uniaxial stretching Stretched Ag coated poly(ε-caprolactone) film MG-green mussel surface- 0.1×10−6 M ref.176
      Pyramid Si templateMoS2/AgNPs/inverted pyramidal PMMA R6G+MGref.177
      Pyramid Si templateGO/Ag NPs/ pyramidal PMMAMG on shrimpref.178
      Ar plasma etching and Au evaporationWorm-like Au NSs – PET filmR6G-10−9 M ref.179
      Self-assembly and in situ chemical reductionRaspberry-like polyamide@Ag hybrid nanoarray filmR6g-10−14 M Adenosine- 10−9 M ref.180
      PesticidesDrop-dry methodAu NPs (25 nm) - adhesive tapeParathion-methyl- 2.60 ng/cm2Thiram 0.24 ng/cm2Chlorpyrifos 3.51 ng/cm2on apples, oranges, cucumbers, and green vegetables surfaces ref.181
      Spin coating and manual peelingAgNP@AgNW network-PDMSThiram (0.1µM) on a leaf surface and MG (0.1µM) on a living fish scale ref.182
      Paste and peeling of self-assembled NPs from SiAdhesive acrylic polymer tape and polyethene terephthalate (PET) film (T/Au@Ag/PET)Thiram on apple, tomato, and cucumber peels (5 ng/cm2) ref.113
      Seed mediatedGold nanobush+PDMSThiabendazole (TBZ) on cherry – 0.64 ng/ml Carbaryl TBZ+Carbaryl ref.183
      Femtosecond laser induced plasma assisted ablationAg NPs and Au NPs FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) Thiram on apple- 7.96 ng/cm2ref.184
      Drop castingAg NS with spikes-adhesive tapePhosmet & carbaryl on apple-surface 10 −7M ref.185
    • Table 3. A summary of the commercially available SERS substrates, their costs, sensitivities and their stability (non-exhaustive).

      Table 3. A summary of the commercially available SERS substrates, their costs, sensitivities and their stability (non-exhaustive).

      S. No.CompanySERS substrateSensitivityStabilityCostRef
      1StellarnetCellulose with Au NPs~1063 months$199 (pack of 30)ref.186
      2Horiba France SASGlass coated with Au nanorods processed by dynamic oblique vacuum evaporationref.187
      3SERSitiveElectrodeposition of silver and gold nanoparticles on an ITO glass surface~105–1064 months5 pcs Ag- €115 5 pcs Ag-Au- €138 ref.188
      4EnSpectr Inc.Si/Glass passivated with a thin transparent dielectic layer.~106Stable when unpackedref.189
      5SilmecoNanostructured Si deposited with Gold (Au), Silver (Ag)5 units €350ref.190
      6HamamatsuAu NS on polypropylene3 months when unpacked ref.191
      7Integrated OpticsAg/Au coating on silicate glass.2 monthsAg- €15 Au- €18 ref.192
      8Mesophotonics. Ltd. KlariteSi100 USD for single 2 mm × 2 mm sample.ref.193
      9Q SERS TMAu NSs on Si (5 mm × 5 mm)ppb to ppm6 months (package) 2 weeks (package opened) 2 units $50 USDref.194
      10MetrohmAg, Au based Filter paperref.195

    Conclusions and outlook

    In recent years the development and applications of flexible SERS substrate has received incredible attention towards the detection of hazardous materials. In this review, we summarized the most recent research (focusing particularly on the last 3−4 years of research) on flexible based SERS substrates, including paper/cellulose, polymer nanofibers, 3D sponges, fabrics, etc., and their potential on-site detection of explosives, pesticides, chemical warfare agents, drugs for homeland security, food safety, and medical fields. There is a tremendous scope for the flexible SERS substrates in the above-mentioned fields and many others not listed here. Particularly in the field of explosive trace detection, these substrates will be highly beneficial. For example, explosives trace swiping/swabbing from luggage surfaces, clothing, vehicle surfaces, post-blast sites will be easier with such flexible substrates. These explosive molecules are sticky and leave behind small traces while handling and transporting them (on various surfaces). Such traces can be easily detected using efficient SERS substrates. Combined with a portable or handheld Raman spectrometers enriched with database/libraries of all explosive molecules, it presents a very attractive methodology for identification and prevention of terrorist activities. Similarly, testing food materials with these substrates enables prevention of easy adulteration (e.g., drinking water, milk, edible oils). Although there are several issues (e.g., further improvements in the sensitivity, long-term stability, reducing the costs) that need to be addressed for each of these methods. But there is also a huge scope for research in these areas, and we firmly believe the developments in these research areas will lead to practical devices.

    Additionally, the recent developments in the understanding of SERS substrates (both plasmonic and non-plasmonic) and their potential have increased by leaps and bounds, the proof of which is evident from the number of review articles published in this area196-198.

    Different real-world applications that can be envisaged with these SERS substrates include

    (a) Biomedical applications, bioimaging and biosensing54, 199, 200;

    (b) Inspection in food quality and safety201;

    (c) Biochemical and medical analysis198;

    (d) Virus detection (including COVID-19)202, 203;

    (e) Plant disease diagnostics204;

    (f) Forensics205.

    Since there are numerous methods by which SERS substrates can be fabricated206, 207, it is imperative that a huge number of efforts are out to identify the niche application(s) for each one of them. For example, one may need to compromise on the cost if we need detection of femtomolar concentration of desired analyte molecule. Similarly, sensitivity is not an issue in some specific cases and cost needs to be considered. There are also tremendous advances in the preparation of nanofibrous mats208, 209 and combination of potential SERS NPs/NSs incorporation in these mats can lead to development of agile, low-cost, and versatile SERS substrates for various applications.


    [1] 1

    [2] What are the main sensor methods for quantifying pesticides in agricultural activities? a review. Molecules, 24, 2659(2019).

    [3] 3Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 3 (The National Academies Press, Washington, 2003).

    [4] A review of chemical warfare agent simulants for the study of environmental behavior. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 38, 112-136(2008).

    [5] Chromo-fluorogenic sensors for chemical warfare agents in real-time analysis: journey towards accurate detection and differentiation. Chem Commun, 57, 3430-3444(2021).

    [6] Laser based systems for standoff detection of CWA: a short review. IEEE Sens J, 21, 4085-4096(2021).

    [7] Laser-based standoff detection of explosives: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem, 395, 259-274(2009).

    [8] Sensor review for trace detection of explosives. Int J Sci Eng Res, 5, 337-350(2014).

    [9] Sensors—an effective approach for the detection of explosives. J Hazard Mater, 144, 15-28(2007).

    [10] Online remote monitoring of explosives by optical fibres. RSC Adv, 6, 103324-103327(2016).

    [11] Bulk detection of explosives and development of customized metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors for the identification of energetic materials. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 258, 1252-1266(2018).

    [12] Key challenges and prospects for optical standoff trace detection of explosives. TrAC Trends Anal Chem, 100, 136-144(2018).

    [13] Terahertz spectroscopy of explosives and drugs. Mater Today, 11, 18-26(2008).

    [14] 14Counterterrorist Detection Techniques of Explosives (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007).

    [15] Portable Raman explosives detection. Anal Bioanal Chem, 393, 1571-1578(2009).

    [16] Handheld dual-wavelength Raman instrument for the detection of chemical agents and explosives. Opt Eng, 55, 074103(2016).

    [17] 17Practical Raman Spectroscopy: An Introduction (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2013); http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119961284.

    [18] Review of SERS substrates for chemical sensing. Nanomaterials, 7, 142(2017).

    [19] Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy for on‐site analysis: a review of recent developments. Luminescence, 35, 808-820(2020).

    [20] Review of surface enhanced Raman scattering applications in forensic science. Anal Chem, 88, 152-169(2016).

    [21] Review of explosive detection methodologies and the emergence of standoff deep UV resonance Raman. J Raman Spectros, 47, 124-141(2016).

    [22] Trinitrotoluene explosive lights up ultrahigh Raman scattering of nonresonant molecule on a top-closed silver nanotube array. Anal Chem, 83, 6913-6917(2011).

    [23] Detection of nerve gases using surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates with high droplet adhesion. Nanoscale, 8, 1305-1308(2016).

    [24] Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem Phys Lett, 26, 163-166(1974).

    [25] Surface Raman spectroelectrochemistry: part I. Heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic amines adsorbed on the anodized silver electrode. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem, 84, 1-20(1977).

    [26] Anomalously intense Raman spectra of pyridine at a silver electrode. J Am Chem Soc, 99, 5215-5217(1977).

    [27] Surface roughness and the enhanced intensity of Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on metals. J Chem Phys, 69, 4159-4161(1978).

    [28] ZnO nanowire arrays decorated with titanium nitride nanoparticles as surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates. Appl Phys A, 127, 270(2021).

    [29] The origin of ultrasensitive SERS sensing beyond plasmonics. Front Phys, 16, 43300(2021).

    [30] Recent progress on two-dimensional layered materials for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and their applications. Mater Today Phys, 18, 100378(2021).

    [31] Large area few-layer hexagonal boron nitride as a Raman enhancement material. Nanomaterials, 11, 622(2021).

    [32] General surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy method for actively capturing target molecules in small gaps. J Am Chem Soc, 143, 7769-7776(2021).

    [33] Quantifying SERS enhancements. MRS Bull, 38, 631-640(2013).

    [34] A review on the fabrication of substrates for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and their applications in analytical chemistry. Anal Chim Acta, 693, 7-25(2011).

    [35] Paper as a platform for sensing applications and other devices: a review. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 7, 8345-8362(2015).

    [36] A critical review of flexible and porous SERS sensors for analytical chemistry at the point-of-sample. Anal Chim Acta, 1060, 17-29(2019).

    [37] Glucose sensors based on electrospun nanofibers: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem, 408, 1285-1306(2016).

    [38] Explosive and chemical threat detection by surface-enhanced Raman scattering: a review. Anal Chim Acta, 893, 1-13(2015).

    [39] A review of cellulose-based substrates for SERS: fundamentals, design principles, applications. Cellulose, 26, 6489-6528(2019).

    [40] Recent progress in manufacturing techniques of printed and flexible sensors: a review. Biosensors, 10, 199(2020).

    [41] Plasmonic tunable Ag-coated gold nanorod arrays as reusable SERS substrates for multiplexed antibiotics detection. J Mater Chem B, 9, 1123-1130(2021).

    [42] Hedgehog inspired CuO nanowires/Cu2O composites for broadband visible‐light‐driven recyclable surface enhanced Raman scattering. Adv Opt Mater, 6, 1701167(2018).

    [43] Advances in flexible surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates for nondestructive food detection: fundamentals and recent applications. Trends Food Sci Technol, 109, 690-701(2021).

    [44] Interpol review of detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues 2016-2019. Forensic Sci Int: Synergy, 2, 670-700(2020).

    [45] Recent developments of flexible and transparent SERS substrates. J Mater Chem C, 8, 3956-3969(2020).

    [46] Trace detection and chemical analysis of homemade fuel-oxidizer mixture explosives: emerging challenges and perspectives. TrAC Trends Anal Chem, 131, 116023(2020).

    [47] Surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate for the detection of explosives: construction strategy and dimensional effect. J Hazard Mater, 387, 121714(2020).

    [48] Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for chemical and biological sensing using nanoplasmonics: the relevance of interparticle spacing and surface morphology. Appl Phys Rev, 7, 031307(2020).

    [49] Recent developments in the field of explosive trace detection. ACS Nano, 14, 10804-10833(2020).

    [50] Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: benefits, trade-offs and future developments. Chem Sci, 11, 4563-4577(2020).

    [51] Paper-based flexible surface enhanced Raman scattering platforms and their applications to food safety. Trends Food Sci Technol, 100, 349-358(2020).

    [52] 2D materials: excellent substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) in chemical sensing and biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal Chem, 130, 115983(2020).

    [53] Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: methods, materials, and applications. Chem Rev, 119, 5298-5415(2019).

    [54] A review on surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Biosensors, 9, 57(2019).

    [55] Designing surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) platforms beyond hotspot engineering: emerging opportunities in analyte manipulations and hybrid materials. Chem Soc Rev, 48, 731-756(2019).

    [56] Toward flexible surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) sensors for point-of-care diagnostics. Adv Sci, 6, 1900925(2019).

    [57] Electrospinning nanoparticles-based materials interfaces for sensor applications. Sensors, 19, 3977(2019).

    [58] Fabrication of a self-assembled and flexible SERS nanosensor for explosive detection at parts-per-quadrillion levels from fingerprints. Analyst, 143, 2012-2022(2018).

    [59] Hybrid metal-insulator-metal structures on Si nanowires array for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Opto-Electron Eng, 44, 185-191(2017).

    [60] Highly sensitive filter paper substrate for SERS trace explosives detection. Int J Spectrosc, 2012, 716527(2012).

    [61] Flexible, transparent, and free-standing silicon nanowire SERS platform for in situ food inspection. ACS Sens, 2, 386-393(2017).

    [62] Surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of pesticide residues using transparent adhesive tapes and coated silver nanorods. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10, 9129-9135(2018).

    [63] Subnanomolar sensitivity of filter paper-based SERS sensor for pesticide detection by hydrophobicity change of paper surface. ACS Sens, 3, 151-159(2018).

    [64] Stable, flexible, and high-performance SERS chip enabled by a ternary film-packaged plasmonic nanoparticle array. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11, 29177-29186(2019).

    [65] Recent advancements in functionalized paper-based electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8, 20501-20515(2016).

    [66] Paper swab based SERS detection of non-permitted colourants from dals and vegetables using a portable spectrometer. Anal Chim Acta, 1090, 106-113(2019).

    [67] Paper-based plasmonic platform for sensitive, noninvasive, and rapid cancer screening. Biosens Bioelectron, 54, 128-134(2014).

    [68] Paper-based multiplex surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection using polymerase chain reaction probe codification. Anal Chem, 93, 3677-3685(2021).

    [69] Plasmonic schirmer strip for human tear-based gouty arthritis diagnosis using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano, 11, 438-443(2017).

    [70] Light trapping induced flexible wrinkled nanocone SERS substrate for highly sensitive explosive detection. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 314, 128081(2020).

    [71] Paper-based SERS swab for rapid trace detection on real-world surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2, 3429-3435(2010).

    [72] Chromatographic separation and detection of target analytes from complex samples using inkjet printed SERS substrates. Analyst, 138, 3679-3686(2013).

    [73] Pen on paper approach toward the design of universal surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates. Small, 10, 3065-3071(2014).

    [74] Inkjet-printed paper-based semiconducting substrates for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanotechnology, 31, 055502(2020).

    [75] SERS on paper: an extremely low cost technique to measure Raman signal. J Phys D: Appl Phys, 50, 485601(2017).

    [76] Single-shot laser treatment provides quasi-three-dimensional paper-based substrates for SERS with attomolar sensitivity. Nanoscale, 7, 1667-1677(2015).

    [77] Highly efficient SERS test strips. Chem Commun, 48, 5913-5915(2012).

    [78] In situ silver nanoparticles synthesis in agarose film supported on filter paper and its application as highly efficient SERS test stripes. Forensic Sci Int, 237, e42-e46(2014).

    [79] “Rinse, Repeat”: an efficient and reusable SERS and catalytic platform fabricated by controlled deposition of silver nanoparticles on cellulose paper. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng, 7, 14089-14101(2019).

    [80] Office paper decorated with silver nanostars - an alternative cost effective platform for trace analyte detection by SERS. Sci Rep, 7, 2480(2017).

    [81] Inkjet printed surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy array on cellulose paper. Anal Chem, 82, 9626-9630(2010).

    [82] A three dimensional silver nanoparticles decorated plasmonic paper strip for SERS detection of low-abundance molecules. Talanta, 147, 493-500(2016).

    [83] Silver‐bacterial cellulosic sponges as active SERS substrates. J Raman Spectrosc, 39, 439-443(2008).

    [84] Facile fabrication of a silver nanoparticle immersed, surface-enhanced Raman scattering imposed paper platform through successive ionic layer absorption and reaction for on-site bioassays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 7, 27910-27917(2015).

    [85] Chloride ion assisted self assembly of silver nanoparticles on filter paper as SERS substrate. Appl Phys A, 118, 799-807(2015).

    [86] Evaluation and optimization of paper-based SERS substrate for potential label-free Raman analysis of seminal plasma. J Nanomater, 2017, 4807064(2017).

    [87] Immobilised gold nanostars in a paper-based test system for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Vib Spectrosc, 68, 45-50(2013).

    [88] Silver nanotriangles-loaded filter paper for ultrasensitive SERS detection application benefited by interspacing of sharp edges. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 231, 357-364(2016).

    [89] Highly sensitive surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates based on filter paper loaded with plasmonic nanostructures. Anal Chem, 83, 8953-8958(2011).

    [90] Highly sensitive and flexible inkjet printed SERS sensors on paper. Methods, 63, 219-224(2013).

    [91] Inkjet-printed fluidic paper devices for chemical and biological analytics using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 20, 7300510(2014).

    [92] Surface enhanced Raman scattering active AuNR array cellulose films for multi hazard detection. J Hazard Mater, 402, 123505(2021).

    [93] Surface-modified paper-based SERS substrates for direct-droplet quantitative determination of trace substances. Cellulose, 27, 1483-1495(2020).

    [94] Ag/Au nanoparticle-loaded paper-based versatile surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates for multiple explosives detection. ACS Omega, 3, 8190-8201(2018).

    [95] A dual-functional PDMS-assisted paper-based SERS platform for the reliable detection of thiram residue both on fruit surfaces and in juice. Anal Methods, 12, 2571-2579(2020).

    [96] A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol, 63, 2223-2253(2003).

    [97] A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies. Nanotechnology, 17, R89-R106(2006).

    [98] 98Handbook of Synthetic Methodologies and Protocols of Nanomaterials, Liu YD, He L, Yin YD edn, 149–181 (World Scientific, 2019); http://doi.org/10.1142/9789813277847_0006.

    [99] Investigating the particle to fibre transition threshold during electrohydrodynamic atomization of a polymer solution. Mater Sci Eng: C, 65, 240-250(2016).

    [100] Loading of Au/Ag bimetallic nanoparticles within and outside of the flexible SiO2 electrospun nanofibers as highly sensitive, stable, repeatable substrates for versatile and trace SERS detection. Polymers, 12, 3008(2020).

    [101] Fabrication of silver nanoparticles embedded into polyvinyl alcohol (Ag/PVA) composite nanofibrous films through electrospinning for antibacterial and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) activities. Mater Sci Eng: C, 69, 462-469(2016).

    [102] Effective SERS detection using a flexible wiping substrate based on electrospun polystyrene nanofibers. Anal Methods, 9, 3998-4003(2017).

    [103] Fabrication and formation mechanism of Ag nanoplate‐decorated nanofiber mats and their application in SERS. Chem-Asian J, 11, 86-92(2016).

    [104] Gold-coated electrospun PVA nanofibers as SERS substrate for detection of pesticides. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 273, 710-717(2018).

    [105] Piezoelectric electrospun nanocomposite comprising Au NPs/PVDF for nerve tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 105, 1984-1993(2017).

    [106] Controlled assemblies of gold nanorods in PVA nanofiber matrix as flexible free‐standing SERS substrates by electrospinning. Small, 8, 648-653(2012).

    [107] Electrospun nanofibrous membranes surface-decorated with silver nanoparticles as flexible and active/sensitive substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Langmuir, 28, 14433-14440(2012).

    [108] Flexible and transparent Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS)-Active Ag NPs/PDMS composites for in-situ detection of food contaminants. Talanta, 201, 58-64(2019).

    [109] Reliable molecular trace-detection based on flexible SERS substrate of graphene/Ag-nanoflowers/PMMA. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 249, 439-450(2017).

    [110] Transparent, flexible surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates based on Ag coated structured PET (polyethylene terephthalate) for in-situ detection. Appl Surf Sci, 379, 66-72(2016).

    [111] Transparent polymer-based SERS substrates templated by a soda can. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 259, 64-74(2018).

    [112] Self-energized organic-inorganic hybrid composite for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Phys, 129, 193102(2021).

    [113] Polymer multilayers enabled stable and flexible Au@Ag nanoparticle array for nondestructive SERS detection of pesticide residues. Talanta, 223, 121782(2021).

    [114] Continuous fabrication of nanostructure arrays for flexible surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate. Sci Rep, 7, 39814(2017).

    [115] Femtosecond laser structuring for flexible surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates. IEEE Photonics J, 13, 6800908(2021).

    [116] SERS based detection of multiple analytes from dye/explosive mixtures using picosecond laser fabricated gold nanoparticles and nanostructures. Analyst, 144, 2327-2336(2019).

    [117] Ultra-sensitive reusable SERS sensor for multiple hazardous materials detection on single platform. J Hazard Mater, 407, 124353(2021).

    [118] Picosecond laser fabricated Ag, Au and Ag-Au nanoparticles for detecting ammonium perchlorate using a portable Raman spectrometer. AIP Conf Proc, 1942, 050028(2018).

    [119] Femtosecond laser-induced, nanoparticle-embedded periodic surface structures on crystalline silicon for reproducible and multi-utility SERS platforms. ACS Omega, 3, 18420-18432(2018).

    [120] Instantaneous trace detection of nitro-explosives and mixtures with nanotextured silicon decorated with Ag–Au alloy nanoparticles using the SERS technique. Anal Chim Acta, 1101, 157-168(2020).

    [121] Effect of oblique incidence on silver nanomaterials fabricated in water via ultrafast laser ablation for photonics and explosives detection. Appl Surf Sci, 303, 217-232(2014).

    [122] Application of anisotropic silver nanoparticles: multifunctionalization of wool fabric. J Colloid Interface Sci, 356, 513-518(2011).

    [123] Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) fabrics for trace analysis. Appl Surf Sci, 386, 296-302(2016).

    [124] Low-cost and large-scale flexible SERS-cotton fabric as a wipe substrate for surface trace analysis. Appl Surf Sci, 436, 111-116(2018).

    [125] Coating fabrics with gold nanorods for colouring, UV-protection, and antibacterial functions. Nanoscale, 5, 788-795(2013).

    [126] Advanced visible-light-driven self-cleaning cotton by Au/TiO2/SiO2 photocatalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2, 82-85(2010).

    [127] Rapid and highly sensitive SERS detection of fungicide based on flexible “wash free” metallic textile. Appl Surf Sci, 512, 144693(2020).

    [128] Flexible SERS substrate based on Ag nanodendrite–coated carbon fiber cloth: simultaneous detection for multiple pesticides in liquid droplet. Anal Bioanal Chem, 412, 1159-1167(2020).

    [129] In-situ grown silver nanoparticles on nonwoven fabrics based on mussel-inspired polydopamine for highly sensitive SERS Carbaryl pesticides detection. Nanomaterials, 9, 384(2019).

    [130] Evaluation of the reliability of six commercial SERS substrates. Plasmonics, 15, 743-752(2020).

    [131] Detecting forensic substances using commercially available SERS substrates and handheld Raman spectrometers. Talanta, 189, 649-652(2018).

    [132] Inkjet-printed silver nanoparticle paper detects airborne species from crystalline explosives and their ultratrace residues in open environment. Anal Chem, 86, 3338-3345(2014).

    [133] Gold-nanoparticle-and nanostar-loaded paper-based SERS substrates for sensing nanogram-level Picric acid with a portable Raman spectrometer. Bull Mater Sci, 43, 53(2020).

    [134] Fabrication of flexible, cost-effective, and scalable silver substrates for efficient surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy based trace detection. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 619, 126542(2021).

    [135] Inkjet-printed paper-based SERS dipsticks and swabs for trace chemical detection. Analyst, 138, 1020-1025(2013).

    [136] Application of plasma-printed paper-based SERS substrate for cocaine detection. Sensors, 21, 810(2021).

    [137] Controllable in-situ growth of silver nanoparticles on filter paper for flexible and highly sensitive SERS sensors for malachite green residue detection. Nanomaterials, 10, 826(2020).

    [138] A facile wet-chemistry approach to engineer an Au-based SERS substrate and enhance sensitivity down to ppb-level detection. Nanoscale, 13, 3991-3999(2021).

    [139] A novel paper rag as ‘D-SERS’substrate for detection of pesticide residues at various peels. Talanta, 128, 117-124(2014).

    [140] Glass fibre paper-based test strips for sensitive SERS sensing. Anal Methods, 8, 1313-1318(2016).

    [141] Highly sensitive and label-free determination of thiram residue using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) coupled with paper-based microfluidics. Anal Methods, 9, 6186-6193(2017).

    [142] Rapid and sensitive on-site detection of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables using screen-printed paper-based SERS swabs. Anal Methods, 10, 4655-4664(2018).

    [143] Dual functional PDMS sponge SERS substrate for the on-site detection of pesticides both on fruit surfaces and in juice. Analyst, 143, 2689-2695(2018).

    [144] Low-cost, high-performance plasmonic nanocomposites for hazardous chemical detection using surface enhanced Raman scattering. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 274, 30-36(2018).

    [145] In situ synthesis of gold nanoparticles on pseudo-paper films as flexible SERS substrate for sensitive detection of surface organic residues. Talanta, 197, 225-233(2019).

    [146] Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) of mancozeb and thiamethoxam assisted by gold and silver nanostructures produced by laser techniques on paper. Appl Spectros, 73, 313-319(2019).

    [147] Hydrophobic paper-based SERS platform for direct-droplet quantitative determination of melamine. Food Chem, 287, 363-368(2019).

    [148] Flexible paper-based SERS substrate strategy for rapid detection of methyl parathion on the surface of fruit. Spectrochim Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 231, 118104(2020).

    [149] Flexible Ag/nanocellulose fibers SERS substrate and its applications for in-situ hazardous residues detection on food. Appl Surf Sci, 533, 147454(2020).

    [150] Development of cellulose nanofiber-based substrates for rapid detection of ferbam in kale by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Food Chem, 347, 129023(2021).

    [151] Flexible nanocellulose-based SERS substrates for fast analysis of hazardous materials by spiral scanning. J Hazard Mater, 414, 125160(2021).

    [152] Paper-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy sensors for field applications. J Raman Spectros, 52, 563-572(2021).

    [153] PCR-coupled Paper-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of respiratory bacterial DNA. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 326, 128802(2021).

    [154] Mesoporous Au films assembled on flexible cellulose nanopaper as high-performance SERS substrates. Chem Eng J, 419, 129445(2021).

    [155] DNA-induced assembly of silver nanoparticle decorated cellulose nanofiber: a flexible surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrate for the selective charge molecular detection and wipe test of pesticide residues in fruits. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng, 9, 5217-5229(2021).

    [156] Fabrication of SERS swab for direct detection of trace explosives in fingerprints. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6, 21931-21937(2014).

    [157] Silver-nanoparticles-loaded chitosan foam as a flexible SERS substrate for active collecting analytes from both solid surface and solution. Talanta, 191, 241-247(2019).

    [158] Fabrication of sensitive silver-decorated cotton swabs for SERS quantitative detection of mixed pesticide residues in bitter gourds. New J Chem, 44, 12779-12784(2020).

    [159] Mussel-inspired immobilization of silver nanoparticles toward sponge for rapid swabbing extraction and SERS detection of trace inorganic explosives. Talanta, 204, 189-197(2019).

    [160] Gold nanoparticle nanofibres as SERS substrate for detection of methylene blue and a chemical warfare simulant (methyl salicylate). Bull Mater Sci, 14, 103(2021).

    [161] Synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol/Ag electrospun nanofibers as highly efficient flexible SERS substrates. Vib Spectrosc, 114, 103246(2021).

    [162] Highly enhanced Raman scattering with good reproducibility observed on a flexible PI nanofabric substrate decorated by silver nanoparticles with controlled size. Appl Surf Sci, 511, 145443(2020).

    [163] Fabrication of non-woven fabric-based SERS substrate for direct detection of pesticide residues in fruits. J Anal Test, 1, 322-329(2017).

    [164] Depositing a flexible substrate of triangular silver nanoplates onto cotton fabrics for sensitive SERS detection. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 270, 508-517(2018).

    [165] Polydopamine-assisted immobilization of Ag@AuNPs on cotton fabrics for sensitive and responsive SERS detection. Cellulose, 26, 4191-4204(2019).

    [166] Flexible Ag SERS substrate for non-destructive and rapid detection of toxic materials on irregular surface. Surf Interfaces, 23, 100995(2021).

    [167] In situ photochemical deposition of Ag nanoparticles on polyester fiber membranes as flexible SERS substrates for sensitive detection of sodium saccharin in soft drinks. Microchem J, 164, 106003(2021).

    [168] Fabrication of plasmonic cotton gauze-Ag composite as versatile SERS substrate for detection of pesticides residue. Spectrochim Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 257, 119766(2021).

    [169] Ag-coated nylon fabrics as flexible substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering swabbing applications. J Mater Res, 35, 1271-1278(2020).

    [170] Flexible carbon fiber cloth decorated by Ag nanoparticles for high Raman enhancement. Opt Mater Express, 11, 1321-1333(2021).

    [171] A flexible conductive film prepared by the oriented stacking of Ag and Au/Ag alloy nanoplates and its chemically roughened surface for explosive SERS detection and cell adhesion. RSC Adv, 7, 7073-7078(2017).

    [172] On-demand electromagnetic hotspot generation in surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates via “add-on” plasmonic patch. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11, 37939-37946(2019).

    [173] Gravure printed flexible surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrate for detection of 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) vapor. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 217, 129-135(2015).

    [174] Flexible porous aerogels decorated with Ag nanoparticles as an effective SERS substrate for label-free trace explosives detection. Anal Methods, 12, 4123-4129(2020).

    [175] A SERS stamp: multiscale coupling effect of silver nanoparticles and highly ordered nano-micro hierarchical substrates for ultrasensitive explosive detection. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 321, 128543(2020).

    [176] Uniaxially stretched flexible surface plasmon resonance film for versatile surface enhanced Raman scattering diagnostics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9, 26341-26349(2017).

    [177] 3D hybrid MoS2/AgNPs/inverted pyramid PMMA resonant cavity system for the excellent flexible surface enhanced Raman scattering sensor. Sens Actuators B: Chem, 274, 152-162(2018).

    [178] High-performance 3D flexible SERS substrate based on graphene oxide/silver nanoparticles/pyramid PMMA. Opt Mater Express, 8, 844-857(2018).

    [179] Facile fabrication of Au nanoworms covered polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film: towards flexible SERS substrates. Mater Lett, 294, 129643(2021).

    [180] Raspberry like polyamide@ Ag hybrid nanoarrays with flexible cores and SERS signal enhancement strategy for adenosine detection. Chem Eng J, 422, 129983(2021).

    [181] Flexible and adhesive surface enhance Raman scattering active tape for rapid detection of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Anal Chem, 88, 2149-2155(2016).

    [182] Improving SERS hot spots for on-site pesticide detection by combining silver nanoparticles with nanowires. J Mater Chem C, 6, 8793-8803(2018).

    [183] Contrastive study of in situ sensing and swabbing detection based on SERS-active gold nanobush–PDMS hybrid film. J Agric Food Chem, 69, 1975-1983(2021).

    [184] One-step fabrication of metal nanoparticles on polymer film by femtosecond LIPAA method for SERS detection. Talanta, 228, 122204(2021).

    [185] Ag nanostructures with spikes on adhesive tape as a flexible sers-active substrate for in situ trace detection of pesticides on fruit skin. Nanomaterials, 9, 1750(2019).

    [186] 186https://www.stellarnet.us/spectrometers-accessories/sers-substrates/.

    [187] 187https://www.horiba.com/en_en/products/detail/action/show/Product/sers-substrates-1635/.

    [188] 188https://www.sersitive.eu/.

    [189] 189http://enspectr.com/applications/sers-analysis/.

    [190] 190https://www.silmeco.com/products/sers-substrate-serstrate/.

    [191] 191https://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/product/optical-components/sers-substrate/index.html.

    [192] 192https://integratedoptics.com/products/sers-substrates.

    [193] 193https://www.trademed.com/products/6451/SERS-Substrates.html.

    [194] 194http://www.madatec.com/RAMAN_files/Q-SERS%20G1_data%20sheet-Madatec.pdf.

    [195] 195https://www.metrohm.com/en/products/607506170.

    [196] Present and future of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano, 14, 28-117(2020).

    [197] Recent developments in quantitative SERS: Moving towards absolutequantification. Trends Anal Chem, 102, 359-368(2018).

    [198] Applications of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering in Biochemical and Medical Analysis. Front Chem, 9, 664134(2021).

    [199] Plasmonic nanoplatforms: from surface‐enhanced Raman scattering sensing to biomedical applications. J Raman Spectros, 52, 541-553(2021).

    [200] Surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanotags for bioimaging. J Appl Phys, 129, 191101(2021).

    [201] Evolving trends in SERS-based techniques for food quality and safety: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol, 112, 225-240(2021).

    [202] SERS based lateral flow immunoassay for point-of-care detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 4, 2974-2995(2021).

    [203] Sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 using a SERS-based aptasensor. ACS Sens, 6, 2378-2385(2021).

    [204] Advanced application of Raman spectroscopy and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in plant disease diagnostics: a review. J Agric Food Chem, 69, 2950-2964(2021).

    [205] Trends in vibrational spectroscopy offingermarks for forensicpurposes. Trends Anal Chem, 143, 116341(2021).

    [206] Simple SERS substrates: powerful, portable, and full of potential. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 16, 2224-2239(2014).

    [207] Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: concepts and chemical applications. Angew Chem Int Ed, 53, 4756-4795(2014).

    [208] The current state of the art of plasmonic nanofibrous mats as SERS substrates: design, fabrication and sensor applications. J Mater Chem B, 9, 267-282(2021).

    [209] Gold Nanoparticle Nanofibers as SERS Substrate for Detection of Methylene Blue and a Chemical Warfare Simulant (Methyl Salicylate). Bull Mater Sci, 44, 103(2021).


    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Moram Sree Satya Bharati, Venugopal Rao Soma. Flexible SERS substrates for hazardous materials detection: recent advances[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2021, 4(11): 210048-1

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Review

    Received: Apr. 10, 2021

    Accepted: Jul. 18, 2021

    Published Online: Mar. 16, 2022

    The Author Email: Soma Venugopal Rao (soma_venu@uohyd.ac.in)



    Please enter the answer below before you can view the full text.