Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 51, Issue 4, 20220194(2022)

Trajectory optimization of hypersonic glide vehicle with minimum total infrared radiation (Invited)

Hui Xu1, Guangbin Cai1, Chaoxu Mu2, Yanhong Zhang3, and Xin Li1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Missile Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an 710025, China
  • 2School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • 3Beijing Haidian Qinghe Building Ding 7, Beijing 100085, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(29)
    IWOA flow chart
    Time history of the height
    Histories of the longitude and latitude
    Time history of the velocity
    Resistance acceleration reentry corridor
    Time histories of the AOA
    Time histories of the bank angle
    Time histories of temperature on stagnation point
    Time histories of the infrared radiation
    Time histories of the altitude
    Histories of the longitude and latitude
    Time histories of the velocity
    Resistance acceleration reentry corridor
    Velocity histories of the AOA
    Velocity histories of the bank angle
    Time histories of temperature on stagnation point
    Time histories of the infrared radiation intensity
    Time histories of the velocity
    Time histories of the altitude
    Terminal errors of longitude and latitude
    Velocity histories of the bank angle
    Time histories of temperature on stagnation point
    Time histories of the infrared radiation intensity
    • Table 1. Simulation scene parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Simulation scene parameters

      StateInitial conditionTerminal constraintOther parametersValue
      $ r $/km 6025$ {\dot{Q}}_{\text{max}} $/ $ {\text{kW/}}{{\text{m}}^{-{\text{2}}}} $1200
      $ \theta $/(°) 120160$ {q}_{\text{max}} $/ ${\text{kPa} }$400
      $ \varphi $/(°) 4065$ {n}_{\text{max}} $6
      $ V $/m·s−150001200$ {V}_{1} $/m·s−1$ [4\;000,4\;800] $
      $ \gamma $/(°) −1-$ {V}_{2} $/m·s−1$ [1\;800,4\;000] $
      $ \psi $/(°) 40-$ |{\sigma _0}| $/(°) $ [0,80] $
    • Table 2. Optimization results of four algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Optimization results of four algorithms

      Variable$ {V_1}$/m·s−1$ {V}_{2} $/m·s−1$|{\sigma _0}|$/(°) $ J(u)$/kW·sr−1
      Value4000.011800.2141.4829560.64
    • Table 3. Simulation results of four algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Simulation results of four algorithms

      Algorithms$ {V_1} $/m·s−1$ {V_2} $/m·s−1$|{\sigma _0}|$/(°) $J(u)$/kW·sr−1
      IWOA4000.011800.2141.4829560.64
      WOA4063.991951.6345.4734563.88
      SSA4000.521800.8943.5431268.92
      PSO4135.481895.5247.9438287.97
    • Table 4. Comparison of optimization results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of optimization results

      Terminal errorsIWOAWOASSAPSO
      Altitude/km0.0770.841.120.74
      Velocity/m·s−10.00860.2497.5610.50
      Longitude/(°)0.300.720.861.70
      Latitude/(°)0.070.190.210.42
      Peak temperature/K1921.372061.981977.752173.41
      Peak radiation/ ${\text{kW} } \cdot {\text{s} }{ {\text{r} }^{ - 1} }$283.32368.04316.12442.79
    • Table 5. Disturbances in the Monte Carlo

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Disturbances in the Monte Carlo

      Disturbance$ 3\sigma $values
      Altitude/m200
      Longitude/(°)1
      latitude/(°)1
      Velocity/m·s−1100
      Flight path angle/(°)0.2
      Head angle/(°)0.2
    • Table 6. Simulation results of the Monte Carlo

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Simulation results of the Monte Carlo

      Terminal errorMaximum valueAverage valueStandard deviation
      Altitude/km0.990.710.21
      Velocity/m·s−199.9994.889.68
      Longitude/(°)3.711.120.42
      Latitude/(°)1.000.230.20
      Peak temerature/K2213.601962.54178.02
      Peak radiation/ ${\text{kW} } \cdot {\text{s} }{ {\text{r} }^{ - 1} }$471.73314.3452.20
      Total radiation/ ${\text{kW} } \cdot {\text{s} }{ {\text{r} }^{ - 1} }$40278.9131592.073516.83
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hui Xu, Guangbin Cai, Chaoxu Mu, Yanhong Zhang, Xin Li. Trajectory optimization of hypersonic glide vehicle with minimum total infrared radiation (Invited)[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(4): 20220194

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Special issue—Infrared detection and recognition technology under superspeed flow field

    Received: Jan. 10, 2022

    Accepted: Apr. 8, 2022

    Published Online: May. 18, 2022

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20220194

    Topics